Standard Practice for Establishing Shipbuilding Quality Requirements for Hull Structure, Outfitting, and Coatings

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
To achieve success in ship construction, it is necessary for the ship owner and the ship builder to agree on the level of quality in the final product. Classification rules, regulatory requirements, and ship specifications all help to define an acceptable level of construction quality; however, this guidance alone is not sufficient. It is up to the shipbuilder, therefore, to describe the level of workmanship sufficiently that will be reflected in the delivered ship, and for the ship owner to communicate his expectations effectively for the final product.
It is the intent of this document to contribute to these objectives in the following ways:
To describe a reasonable acceptable level of workmanship for commercial vessels built in the United States.
To provide a baseline from which individual shipyards can begin to develop their own product and process standards in accordance with generally accepted practice in the commercial marine industry.
To provide a foundation for negotiations between the shipbuilder and the ship owner in reaching a common expectation of construction quality.
The acceptance criteria herein are based on currently practiced levels of quality generally achieved by leading international commercial shipbuilders. These criteria are not intended to be a hard standard with which all U.S. shipyards must comply. Rather, they are intended to provide guidance and recommendations in the key areas that play a major role in customer satisfaction and cost-effective ship construction.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice consists of three annexes: hull structure, outfitting, and coating. The subject of these annexes was selected for several reasons. Other commercial shipbuilding nations already have in place widely recognized standards of expectations in these areas. These constitute the most significant areas where workmanship is a critical factor in customer satisfaction. The cost associated with the labor involved in these three areas is a significant factor in construction man-hours and overall schedules.
1.2 The standard criteria provided in this practice are intended to apply to conventional, commercial ship construction. In many cases, specialized, nonconventional vessels using nonstandard materials or built-to-serve sole requirements may require unique acceptance criteria that are beyond those provided in this practice.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Apr-2012
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM F2016-00(2012) - Standard Practice for Establishing Shipbuilding Quality Requirements for Hull Structure, Outfitting, and Coatings
English language
73 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:F2016 −00 (Reapproved 2012) An American National Standard
Standard Practice for
Establishing Shipbuilding Quality Requirements for Hull
Structure, Outfitting, and Coatings
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F2016; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2.3 NACE Standards:
NACE No. 5 Surface Preparation and Cleaning of Steel and
1.1 This practice consists of three annexes: hull structure,
Other Hard Materials by High-and Ultrahigh-Pressure
outfitting, and coating. The subject of these annexes was
Water Jetting Prior to Re-coating (SSPC-SP 12)
selected for several reasons. Other commercial shipbuilding
NACE No. 7 Interim Guide and Visual Reference Photo-
nations already have in place widely recognized standards of
graphs for Steel Cleaned by Water Jetting (SSPC-VIS
expectations in these areas. These constitute the most signifi-
4(1))
cant areas where workmanship is a critical factor in customer
2.4 SSPC Standards:
satisfaction. The cost associated with the labor involved in
SSPC-AB 1 Mineral and Slag Abrasives
these three areas is a significant factor in construction man-
SSPC-AB 2 Specification for Cleanliness of Recycled Fer-
hours and overall schedules.
rous Metallic Abrasives
1.2 The standard criteria provided in this practice are SSPC-PA 2 Measurement of Dry Coating Thickness With
intended to apply to conventional, commercial ship construc- Magnetic Gages
tion.Inmanycases,specialized,nonconventionalvesselsusing SSPC-SP 1 Solvent Cleaning
nonstandard materials or built-to-serve sole requirements may SSPC-SP 2 Hand Tool Cleaning
require unique acceptance criteria that are beyond those SSPC-SP 3 Power Tool Cleaning
provided in this practice. SSPC-SP 7 Brush-Off Blast Cleaning
SSPC-SP 10 Near-White Blast Cleaning
2. Referenced Documents SSPC-SP 11 Power Toll Cleaning to Bare Metal
SSPC-SP 12 Surface Preparation and Cleaning of Steel and
2.1 ASTM Standards:
Other Hard Materials by High-and Ultrahigh-Pressure
D4417 Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface
Water Jetting Prior to Re-coating (NACE No. 5)
Profile of Blast Cleaned Steel
SSPC-VIS 1-89 Visual Standard forAbrasive Blast Cleaned
E337 Test Method for Measuring Humidity with a Psy-
Steel
chrometer (the Measurement of Wet- and Dry-Bulb Tem-
SSPC-VIS 3 Visual Standard for Power- and Hand-Tool
peratures)
Cleaned Steel
2.2 ISO Standards:
SSPC-VIS 4(1) Interim Guide and Visual Reference Photo-
ISO 8502–3 Assessment of Dust on Steel Surfaces Prepared
graphs for Steel Cleaned by Water Jetting (NACE No. 7)
for Painting (Pressure-Sensitive Tape Method)
2.5 NSRP Documents:
ISO 8502–6 Extraction of Soluble Contaminants for
National Shipbuilding Research Project 6–97–1 “American
Analysis—The Bresle Method
Shipbuilding Quality Standards,” dated May 28, 1999
3. Summary of Practice
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F25 on Ships and
3.1 This practice provides workmanship criteria to be ap-
Marine Technologyand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F25.07 on
plied to commercial shipbuilding or ship repair, or both. The
General Requirements.
Current edition approved May 1, 2012. Published May 2012. Originally
approved in 2000. Last previous edition approved in 2006 as F2016 – 00 (2006).
DOI: 10.1520/F2016-00R12. Available from NACE International (NACE), 1440 South Creek Dr., Houston,
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or TX 77084-4906, http://www.nace.org.
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Available from Society for Protective Coatings (SSPC), 40 24th St., 6th Floor,
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4656, http://www.sspc.org.
the ASTM website. Available from The Librarian, Documentation Center, Marine Systems
Available fromAmerican National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St., Division, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2901 Baxter
4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org. Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48109–2150.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
F2016−00 (2012)
criteria covers three primary phases of ship construction, that 4.2.2 Toprovideabaselinefromwhichindividualshipyards
is, hull structure, outfitting, and coatings. Specific criteria to be can begin to develop their own product and process standards
selected from this standard should be as contractually agreed in accordance with generally accepted practice in the commer-
between the ship owner and shipbuilder. cial marine industry.
4.2.3 To provide a foundation for negotiations between the
4. Significance and Use
shipbuilder and the ship owner in reaching a common expec-
4.1 To achieve success in ship construction, it is necessary
tation of construction quality.
for the ship owner and the ship builder to agree on the level of
4.3 The acceptance criteria herein are based on currently
quality in the final product. Classification rules, regulatory
practiced levels of quality generally achieved by leading
requirements, and ship specifications all help to define an
international commercial shipbuilders. These criteria are not
acceptable level of construction quality; however, this guid-
intended to be a hard standard with which all U.S. shipyards
ancealoneisnotsufficient.Itisuptotheshipbuilder,therefore,
must comply. Rather, they are intended to provide guidance
to describe the level of workmanship sufficiently that will be
and recommendations in the key areas that play a major role in
reflected in the delivered ship, and for the ship owner to
customer satisfaction and cost-effective ship construction.
communicate his expectations effectively for the final product.
4.2 It is the intent of this document to contribute to these
5. Keywords
objectives in the following ways:
5.1 coatings; hull structure; outfitting; quality; shipbuilding;
4.2.1 Todescribeareasonableacceptablelevelofworkman-
ship for commercial vessels built in the United States. workmanship
ANNEXES
(Mandatory Information)
A1. HULL STRUCTURE
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.1Hull Structure
FIG. A1.2Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.3Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.4Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.5Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.6Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.7Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.8Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.9Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.10Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.11Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.12Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.13Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.14Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.15Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.16Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.17Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.18Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.19Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.20Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.21Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.22Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.23Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A1.24Hull Structure
F2016−00 (2012)
A2. OUTFITTING
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A2.1Piping
F2016−00 (2012)
FIG. A2.2Piping
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.