ASTM D4086-92a(2012)
(Practice)Standard Practice for Visual Evaluation of Metamerism
Standard Practice for Visual Evaluation of Metamerism
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Metameric color matches result from the use of different colorants (pigments, dyes, and the like) in achieving the same color match. Usually, the purchaser requires that the color match be nonmetameric; this practice permits this requirement to be quickly tested in both field and laboratory. Where nonmetameric matches are not possible or practicable, for cost or other reasons, some limitation of metamerism may be required. The procedures for estimating the magnitude of metamerism described in this practice provide methods for assessing the effectiveness of such limitation.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes visual methods for detecting metamerism and for estimating the magnitude of a metameric color difference.
1.2 The practice is limited to the consideration of illuminant metamerism and observer metamerism. It is not designed to cover so-called geometric metamerism, in which members of specimen pairs change relative appearance as the angles of illumination and viewing are changed, for example, because they incorporate flake metal or pearlescent colorants.
1.3 This practice does not provide for the computation of indices of metamerism based upon instrumental measurement of spectral characteristics.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D4086 − 92a (Reapproved 2012)
Standard Practice for
Visual Evaluation of Metamerism
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D4086; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
Because perceived color involves the spectral characteristics of source, object, and eye, different
combinations of spectral characteristics can evoke the same color sensation. For this reason,
metamerism has been described as “invisible spectral differences.”
Apairofspecimensissaidtobemetamericwhenthespecimensmatchunderonesetofilluminating
and viewing conditions and do not match under another set. For this condition to exist, there must be
differences in spectral character of specimens and sources or specimens and observers. There may be
more than one condition under which the specimens match, as well as more than one for which they
are a mismatch. Similarly, two specimens may be a near-match under one set of conditions, and under
another set the direction and magnitude of the color difference may change.
1. Scope D2616 Test Method for Evaluation of Visual Color Differ-
ence With a Gray Scale
1.1 This practice describes visual methods for detecting
E284 Terminology of Appearance
metamerism and for estimating the magnitude of a metameric
color difference.
3. Terminology
1.2 The practice is limited to the consideration of illuminant
3.1 Definitions of appearance terms used in this practice
metamerism and observer metamerism. It is not designed to
may be found in Terminology E284.
cover so-called geometric metamerism, in which members of
specimen pairs change relative appearance as the angles of
3.2 Definitions:
illumination and viewing are changed, for example, because 3.2.1 metamerism, n—propertyoftwospecimensthatmatch
they incorporate flake metal or pearlescent colorants.
under a specified illuminator and to a specified observer and
whose spectral reflectances or transmittances differ in the
1.3 This practice does not provide for the computation of
visible wavelengths.
indices of metamerism based upon instrumental measurement
3.2.1.1 Discussion—As a consequence of the required
of spectral characteristics.
difference, the two specimens may not match under a different
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
illuminator or to a different observer. Similar considerations
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
apply to two lights matching to a specified observer but not to
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
other observers. (E284)
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
3.2.2 paramerism, n—phenomenon in which specimens
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
having different spectrophotometric curves produce approxi-
mately the same color sensation under the same illuminating
2. Referenced Documents
and viewing conditions. (E284)
2.1 ASTM Standards:
4. Significance and Use
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E12 on Color and
4.1 Metameric color matches result from the use of different
Appearance and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E12.11 on Visual
colorants (pigments, dyes, and the like) in achieving the same
Methods.
color match. Usually, the purchaser requires that the color
Current edition approved July 1, 2012. Published August 2012. Originally
match be nonmetameric; this practice permits this requirement
approved in 1982. Last previous edition approved in 2007 as D4086 – 92a (2007).
DOI: 10.1520/D4086-92AR12.
to be quickly tested in both field and laboratory. Where
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
nonmetameric matches are not possible or practicable, for cost
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
or other reasons, some limitation of metamerism may be
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website. required. The procedures for estimating the magnitude of
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D4086 − 92a (2012)
metamerism described in this practice provide methods for Significance and Use section in Test Method D2616, that, the
assessing the effectiveness of such limitation. total color difference can be so evaluated in terms of an
equivalent lightness difference. Observers can be expected to
5. Test Specimens
reproducesuchevaluationswithinahalf-steponthegrayscale.
5.1 This practice does not cover the preparation of test
NOTE 1—Visual Evaluation of Spectral Reflectance Curves—When
specimens. The method shall be agreed upon between the
specimens that match under one set of circu
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.