ASTM D4086-92a(2007)
(Practice)Standard Practice for Visual Evaluation of Metamerism
Standard Practice for Visual Evaluation of Metamerism
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Metameric color matches result from the use of different colorants (pigments, dyes, and the like) in achieving the same color match. Usually, the purchaser requires that the color match be nonmetameric; this practice permits this requirement to be quickly tested in both field and laboratory. Where nonmetameric matches are not possible or practicable, for cost or other reasons, some limitation of metamerism may be required. The procedures for estimating the magnitude of metamerism described in this practice provide methods for assessing the effectiveness of such limitation.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes visual methods for detecting metamerism and for estimating the magnitude of a metameric color difference.
1.2 The practice is limited to the consideration of illuminant metamerism and observer metamerism. It is not designed to cover so-called geometric metamerism, in which members of specimen pairs change relative appearance as the angles of illumination and viewing are changed, for example, because they incorporate flake metal or pearlescent colorants.
1.3 This practice does not provide for the computation of indices of metamerism based upon instrumental measurement of spectral characteristics.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D4086 − 92a (Reapproved2007)
Standard Practice for
Visual Evaluation of Metamerism
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D4086; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
Because perceived color involves the spectral characteristics of source, object, and eye, different
combinations of spectral characteristics can evoke the same color sensation. For this reason,
metamerism has been described as “invisible spectral differences.”
Apairofspecimensissaidtobemetamericwhenthespecimensmatchunderonesetofilluminating
and viewing conditions and do not match under another set. For this condition to exist, there must be
differences in spectral character of specimens and sources or specimens and observers. There may be
more than one condition under which the specimens match, as well as more than one for which they
are a mismatch. Similarly, two specimens may be a near-match under one set of conditions, and under
another set the direction and magnitude of the color difference may change.
1. Scope D2616 Test Method for Evaluation of Visual Color Differ-
ence With a Gray Scale (Withdrawn 2012)
1.1 This practice describes visual methods for detecting
E284 Terminology of Appearance
metamerism and for estimating the magnitude of a metameric
color difference.
3. Terminology
1.2 The practice is limited to the consideration of illuminant
3.1 Definitions of appearance terms used in this practice
metamerism and observer metamerism. It is not designed to
may be found in Terminology E284.
cover so-called geometric metamerism, in which members of
3.2 Definitions:
specimen pairs change relative appearance as the angles of
3.2.1 metamerism, n—propertyoftwospecimensthatmatch
illumination and viewing are changed, for example, because
under a specified illuminator and to a specified observer and
they incorporate flake metal or pearlescent colorants.
whose spectral reflectances or transmittances differ in the
1.3 This practice does not provide for the computation of
visible wavelengths.
indices of metamerism based upon instrumental measurement
3.2.1.1 Discussion—As a consequence of the required dif-
of spectral characteristics.
ference, the two specimens may not match under a different
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
illuminator or to a different observer. Similar considerations
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
apply to two lights matching to a specified observer but not to
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
other observers. (E284)
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
3.2.2 paramerism, n—phenomenon in which specimens
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
having different spectrophotometric curves produce approxi-
mately the same color sensation under the same illuminating
2. Referenced Documents
and viewing conditions. (E284)
2.1 ASTM Standards:
4. Significance and Use
4.1 Metameric color matches result from the use of different
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E12 on Color and
colorants (pigments, dyes, and the like) in achieving the same
Appearance and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E12.11 on Visual
Methods. color match. Usually, the purchaser requires that the color
Current edition approved May 1, 2007. Published May 2007. Originally
match be nonmetameric; this practice permits this requirement
approved in 1982. Last previous edition approved in 2003 as D4086 – 92a (2003).
to be quickly tested in both field and laboratory. Where
DOI: 10.1520/D4086-92AR07.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
the ASTM website. www.astm.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D4086 − 92a (2007)
nonmetameric matches are not possible or practicable, for cost color difference of the test pair. It is assumed, as in the
or other reasons, some limitation of metamerism may be Significance and Use section in Test Method D2616, that, the
required. The procedures for estimating the magnitude of total color difference can be so evaluated in terms of an
metamerism described in this practice provide methods for equivalent lightness difference. Observers can be expected to
assessing the effectiveness of such limitation. reproducesuchevaluationswithinahalf-steponthegrayscale.
NOTE 1—Visual Evaluation of Spectral Reflectance Curves—When
5. Test Specimens
specimens that match under one set of circums
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.