Standard Test Method for Hydraulic Pullout Resistance of a Geomembrane with Locking Extensions Embedded in Concrete

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Due to hydraulic pressure that may be present on some applications, engineers need to understand the capability of these products to resist this pressure. This test allows engineers to compare products and verify pullout strength.  
5.2 Hydraulic pullout resistance is a function of locking extension dimensions, locking extension geometry, locking extensions per area, locking extension polymer composition, and the properties of the concrete in which the locking extensions are embedded.  
5.3 The data from this test method provides comparative information for rating hydraulic pullout resistance of different geomembranes with locking extensions embedded in concrete. Hydraulic pullout resistance, while partly dependent on locking extension dimensions, has no simple correlation to locking extension dimensions and geometry. Hence, hydraulic pullout resistance cannot be determined with a small sample without potentially producing misleading data to the actual hydraulic pullout resistance of the material. Therefore, the hydraulic pullout resistance is expressed in kPa (lbs/ft2).  
5.4 The apparatus can be circular or square in nature must have a test area of 0.36 m2 (558 in.2).  
5.5 Fig. 1 shows an example of a circular test apparatus that can be used in the performance of this test. The apparatus requires a pressure vessel rated to a minimum 690 kPa (14 410 lbs/ft2). The vessel test diameter should be a minimum of 677.04 mm (26.655 in.) as shown in Fig. 1.FIG. 1 Picture of Circular test apparatusNote 1—Larger vessels may be used but it is up to user to establish correlation to the standard size vessel. The use of a smaller diameter vessel than denoted in standard may contribute to higher pullout resistance due to thickness or stiffness of some products.  
5.6 Test Pedestal—the base of the testing apparatus which holds the test specimen.  
5.7 Upper Flange—is the flange that is bolted down on top of specimen to create a seal.  
5.8 Form—is an aluminum ring used ...
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the hydraulic pullout resistance of a geomembrane with locking extensions embedded in concrete by determining the pressure required for locking extensions of the embedded specimen to pullout of the concrete.  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
28-Feb-2013
Technical Committee
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D7853-13 - Standard Test Method for Hydraulic Pullout Resistance of a Geomembrane with Locking Extensions Embedded in Concrete
English language
4 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D7853 − 13
Standard Test Method for
Hydraulic Pullout Resistance of a Geomembrane with
1
Locking Extensions Embedded in Concrete
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D7853; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 4. Summary of Test Method
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the hy- 4.1 Ageomembrane with locking extensions on at least one
draulic pullout resistance of a geomembrane with locking surface is embedded into concrete. The pullout resistance is
extensions embedded in concrete by determining the pressure determined by measuring the maximum pressure required to
required for locking extensions of the embedded specimen to initiate pullout of the locking extensions from the concrete.
pullout of the concrete. Alternatively, the geomembrane with locking extensions is
embeddedinconcreteandpressurizedtoaspecifiedpressureto
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
verify whether a minimum level of in-place strength has been
standard. The values given in parentheses are provided for
attained.
information only and are not considered standard.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
5. Significance and Use
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
5.1 Due to hydraulic pressure that may be present on some
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
applications, engineers need to understand the capability of
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
these products to resist this pressure.This test allows engineers
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
to compare products and verify pullout strength.
2. Referenced Documents
5.2 Hydraulic pullout resistance is a function of locking
2
extension dimensions, locking extension geometry, locking
2.1 ASTM Standards:
extensions per area, locking extension polymer composition,
A1064 Specification for Carbon-Steel Wire and Welded
and the properties of the concrete in which the locking
Wire Reinforcement, Plain and Deformed, for Concrete
extensions are embedded.
C31 Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Speci-
mens in the Field
5.3 The data from this test method provides comparative
C39 Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical
information for rating hydraulic pullout resistance of different
Concrete Specimens
geomembranes with locking extensions embedded in concrete.
C94 Specification for Ready-Mixed Concrete
Hydraulic pullout resistance, while partly dependent on lock-
D618 Practice for Conditioning Plastics for Testing
ing extension dimensions, has no simple correlation to locking
D4439 Terminology for Geosynthetics
extension dimensions and geometry. Hence, hydraulic pullout
D5947 Test Methods for Physical Dimensions of Solid
resistance cannot be determined with a small sample without
Plastics Specimens
potentially producing misleading data to the actual hydraulic
pullout resistance of the material. Therefore, the hydraulic
2
3. Terminology
pullout resistance is expressed in kPa (lbs/ft ).
3.1 Definitions of terms applying to this test method appear
5.4 The apparatus can be circular or square in nature must
2 2
in Terminology D4439.
have a test area of 0.36 m (558 in. ).
5.5 Fig. 1 shows an example of a circular test apparatus that
can be used in the performance of this test. The apparatus
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D35 on
requires a pressure vessel rated to a minimum 690 kPa (14 410
Geosynthetics and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D35.01 on Mechani-
2
lbs/ft ). The vessel test diameter should be a minimum of
cal Properties.
Current edition approved March 1, 2013. Published March 2013. DOI: 10.1520/ 677.04 mm (26.655 in.) as shown in Fig. 1.
D7853–13.
2
NOTE 1—Larger vessels may be used but it is up to user to establish
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
correlationtothestandardsizevessel.Theuseofasmallerdiametervessel
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on than denoted in standard may contribute to higher pullout resistance due
the ASTM website. to thickness or stiffness of some products.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
D7853 − 13
FIG. 1 Picture of Circular test apparatus
5.6 Test Pedestal—the base of the testing apparatus which 5.8 Form—is an aluminum rin
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.