ASTM D7808-22
(Practice)Standard Practice for Determining the Site Precision of a Process Stream Analyzer on Process Stream Material
Standard Practice for Determining the Site Precision of a Process Stream Analyzer on Process Stream Material
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 The analyzer site precision is an estimate of the variability that can be expected in a UAR or a PPTMR produced by an analyzer when applied to the analysis of the same material over an extended time period.
4.2 For applications where the process analyzer system results are required to agree with results produced from an independent PTM, a mathematical function is derived that relates the UARs to the PPTMRs. The application of this mathematical function to an analyzer result produces a predicted PPTMR. For analyzers where the mathematical function, that is, a correlation, is developed by D7235, the analyzer site precision of the UARs is a required input to the computation.
4.3 After the correlation relationship between the analyzer results and primary test method results has been established, a probationary validation (see D3764 and D6122) is performed using an independent but limited set of materials that were not part of the correlation activity. This probationary validation is intended to demonstrate that the PPTMRs agree with the PTMRs to within user-specified requirements for the analyzer system application. The analyzer site precision is a required input to the probationary validation procedures.
4.3.1 If the process stream analyzer system and the primary test method are based on the same measurement principle(s), or, if the process stream analyzer system uses a direct and well-understood measurement principle that is similar to the measurement principle of the PTM then validation is done via D3764. Practice D3764 also applies if the process stream analyzer system uses a different measurement technology from the PTM, provided that the calibration protocol for the direct output of the analyzer does not require use of the PTM.
4.3.2 If the process stream analyzer system utilizes an indirect or mathematically modeled measurement principle such as chemometric or multivariate analysis techniques where PTMRs are required for the development of the che...
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes a procedure to quantify the site precision of a process analyzer via repetitive measurement of a single process sample over an extended time period. The procedure may be applied to multiple process samples to obtain site precision estimates at different property levels
1.1.1 The site precision is required for use of the statistical methodology of D6708 in establishing the correlation between analyzer results and primary test method results using Practice D7235.
1.1.2 The site precision is also required when employing the statistical methodology of D6708 to validate a process analyzer via Practices D3764 or D6122.
1.2 This practice is not applicable to in-line analyzers where the same quality control sample cannot be repetitively introduced.
1.3 This practice is meant to be applied to analyzers that measure physical properties or compositions.
1.4 This practice can be applied to any process analyzer system where the feed stream can be captured and stored in sufficient quantity with no stratification or stability concerns.
1.4.1 The captured stream sample introduction must be able to meet the process analyzer sample conditioning requirements, feed temperature and inlet pressure.
1.4.2 This practice is designed for use with samples that are single liquid phase, petroleum products whose vapor pressure, at sampling and sample storage conditions, is less than or equal to 110 kPa (16.0 psi) absolute and whose D86 final boiling point is less than or equal to 400 °C (752 °F).
Note 1: The general procedures described in this practice may be applicable to materials outside this range, including multiphase materials, but such application may involve special sampling and safety considerations which are outside the scope of this practice.
1.5 The values for operating conditions are stated in SI units and are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are the hi...
General Information
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: D7808 − 22
Standard Practice for
Determining the Site Precision of a Process Stream
1
Analyzer on Process Stream Material
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D7808; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
Whenaprocessstreamanalyzerisusedtomonitororcontrolaprocess,theresultsproducedbythe
analyzer are typically used as surrogates for values that would otherwise have been obtained via
analyses of process samples using a Primary Test Method (PTM). Successful application of the
analyzer requires that the Predicted Primary Test Method Result (PPTMR) produced by the analyzer
agreeswiththePrimaryTestMethodResult(PTMR)towithinsomeuserspecifiedaccuracy(biasand
precision). To achieve this goal, it is typically necessary to develop a correlation that relates raw,
UncorrectedAnalyzer Results (UARs) to PTMRs. The correlation and the analyzers performance are
then assessed during the analyzer validation to establish the expected agreement between the PPTMR
and PTMR. In establishing the correlation, and assessing the performance, it is necessary to know the
precision of both the PPTMR and the PTMR. The precision of the PTMRs is typically established
through statistical quality control procedures described in D6299. The precision of the PPTMRs is
established via procedures described herein. The techniques used to determine process analyzer site
precision can also be used for ongoing quality control of the analyzer measurement system.
1. Scope* 1.4 This practice can be applied to any process analyzer
system where the feed stream can be captured and stored in
1.1 This practice describes a procedure to quantify the site
sufficient quantity with no stratification or stability concerns.
precisionofaprocessanalyzerviarepetitivemeasurementofa
1.4.1 Thecapturedstreamsampleintroductionmustbeable
single process sample over an extended time period. The
to meet the process analyzer sample conditioning
proceduremaybeappliedtomultipleprocesssamplestoobtain
requirements, feed temperature and inlet pressure.
site precision estimates at different property levels
1.4.2 This practice is designed for use with samples that are
1.1.1 The site precision is required for use of the statistical
single liquid phase, petroleum products whose vapor pressure,
methodology of D6708 in establishing the correlation between
atsamplingandsamplestorageconditions,islessthanorequal
analyzer results and primary test method results using Practice
to 110kPa (16.0psi) absolute and whose D86 final boiling
D7235.
point is less than or equal to 400°C (752°F).
1.1.2 Thesiteprecisionisalsorequiredwhenemployingthe
NOTE 1—The general procedures described in this practice may be
statisticalmethodologyofD6708tovalidateaprocessanalyzer
applicable to materials outside this range, including multiphase materials,
via Practices D3764 or D6122.
but such application may involve special sampling and safety consider-
ations which are outside the scope of this practice.
1.2 Thispracticeisnotapplicabletoin-lineanalyzerswhere
the same quality control sample cannot be repetitively intro-
1.5 ThevaluesforoperatingconditionsarestatedinSIunits
duced. and are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in
parentheses are the historical inch-pound units for information
1.3 This practice is meant to be applied to analyzers that
only.
measure physical properties or compositions.
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants and is the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee D02.25 on Performance Assessment and Validation of Process
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Stream Analyzer Systems.
1.7 This international standard was developed in accor-
Current edition approved April 1, 2022. Published June 2022. Originally
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
approved in 2012. Last previous edition approved in 2018 as D7808–18. DOI:
10.1520/D7808-22. ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO B
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: D7808 − 18 D7808 − 22
Standard Practice for
Determining the Site Precision of a Process Stream
1
Analyzer on Process Stream Material
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D7808; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
When a process stream analyzer is used to monitor or control a process, the results produced by the
analyzer are typically used as surrogates for values that would otherwise have been obtained via
analyses of process samples using a Primary Test Method (PTM). Successful application of the
analyzer requires that the Predicted Primary Test Method Result (PPTMR) produced by the analyzer
agrees with the Primary Test Method Result (PTMR) to within some user specified accuracy (bias and
precision). To achieve this goal, it is typically necessary to develop a correlation that relates raw,
Uncorrected Analyzer Results (UARs) to PTMRs. The correlation and the analyzers performance are
then assessed during the analyzer validation to establish the expected agreement between the PPTMR
and PTMR. In establishing the correlation, and assessing the performance, it is necessary to know the
precision of both the PPTMR and the PTMR. The precision of the PTMRs is typically established
through statistical quality control procedures described in D6299. The precision of the PPTMRs is
established via procedures described herein. The techniques used to determine process analyzer site
precision can also be used for ongoing quality control of the analyzer measurement system.
1. Scope*
1.1 This practice describes a procedure to quantify the site precision of a process analyzer via repetitive measurement of a single
process sample over an extended time period. The procedure may be applied to multiple process samples to obtain site precision
estimates at different property levels
1.1.1 The site precision is required for use of the statistical methodology of D6708 in establishing the correlation between analyzer
results and primary test method results using Practice D7235.
1.1.2 The site precision is also required when employing the statistical methodology of D6708 to validate a process analyzer via
Practices D3764 or D6122.
1.2 This practice is not applicable to in-line analyzers where the same quality control sample cannot be repetitively introduced.
1.3 This practice is meant to be applied to analyzers that measure physical properties or compositions.
1.4 This practice can be applied to any process analyzer system where the feed stream can be captured and stored in sufficient
quantity with no stratification or stability concerns.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
D02.25 on Performance Assessment and Validation of Process Stream Analyzer Systems.
Current edition approved July 1, 2018April 1, 2022. Published August 2018June 2022. Originally approved in 2012. Last previous edition approved in 20122018 as
D7808 – 12.D7808 – 18. DOI: 10.1520/D7808-18.10.1520/D7808-22.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
D7808 − 22
1.4.1 The captured stream sample introduction must be able to meet the process analyzer sample conditioning requirements, feed
temperature and inlet pressure.
1.4.2 This practice is designed for use with samples that are single liquid phase, petroleum products whose vapor pressure, at
sampling and sample storage conditions, is less than or equal to 110 kPa (16.0 psi) absolute and whose D86 final boiling point is
less than or equal to 400 °C (752 °F).
NOTE 1—The general procedures described in this practice may be applicable to materials outside this range, including multiphase materials, but such
application may involve special sampling and safety considerations which are outside the scope of this practice.
1.5 The values for operating conditions are stated in SI units and are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in
parentheses are the historical inch-pound units for information only.
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the saf
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.