ASTM E1961-16(2021)
(Practice)Standard Practice for Mechanized Ultrasonic Testing of Girth Welds Using Zonal Discrimination with Focused Search Units
Standard Practice for Mechanized Ultrasonic Testing of Girth Welds Using Zonal Discrimination with Focused Search Units
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This practice is intended primarily for the mechanized ultrasonic examination of pipe girth welds used in the construction of gas and oil pipelines. This practice, with appropriate modifications due to changes in weld profile, may also be used to examine repaired welds. Manual techniques such as described in Practice E164 may also be used to examine production or repaired welds. This practice, with appropriate modifications, may also be used to examine other forms of butt welds including long seams.
4.2 Techniques used are to be based on zonal discrimination whereby the weld is divided into approximately equal vertical examination sections (zones) each being assessed by a pair of ultrasonic search units. See Fig. 1 for typical zones.
FIG. 1 Schematic Representation of Weld Zones and Discontinuities
4.3 Thicknesses of material examined are normally 7 to 25 mm (0.28 to 1.00 in.) and pipe diameters 15 cm (6.0 in.) and greater but this standard may apply to other thicknesses and diameters if the techniques can be proven to provide the required zonal discrimination.
4.4 Examination zones are typically 2 to 3 mm (0.08 to 0.12 in.) in height. For most applications this will require the use of contact focused search units to avoid interfering signals originating from off-axis geometric reflectors and to avoid excessive overlap with adjacent zones.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers the requirements for mechanized ultrasonic examination of girth welds. Evaluation is based upon the results of mechanized ultrasonic examination. Acceptance criteria are based upon flaw limits defined by an Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA) or other accept/reject criteria defined by the Contracting Agency.
1.2 This practice shall be applicable to the development of an examination procedure agreed upon between the users of this practice.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The inch-pound units given in parentheses are for information only.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: E1961 − 16 (Reapproved 2021)
Standard Practice for
Mechanized Ultrasonic Testing of Girth Welds Using Zonal
Discrimination with Focused Search Units
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1961; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope* Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Testing Instruments and Systems
without the Use of Electronic Measurement Instruments
1.1 This practice covers the requirements for mechanized
E543 Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive
ultrasonic examination of girth welds. Evaluation is based
Testing
upon the results of mechanized ultrasonic examination.Accep-
E1316 Terminology for Nondestructive Examinations
tance criteria are based upon flaw limits defined by an
2.3 ASNT Standards:
Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA) or other accept/reject
ASNT Practice SNT-TC-1A Personnel Qualification and
criteria defined by the Contracting Agency.
Certification in Nondestructive Testing
1.2 This practice shall be applicable to the development of
ANSI/ASNT-CP-189 Standard for Qualification and Certifi-
an examination procedure agreed upon between the users of
cation of Nondestructive Testing Personnel
this practice.
2.4 AIA Standard:
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
NAS-410 Nondestructive Testing Personnel Qualification
standard. The inch-pound units given in parentheses are for
and Certification
information only. 5
2.5 API Standard:
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
API STD–1104 Welding of Pipeline and Related Facilities
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
2.6 CSA Standard:
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
CSA Z-662 Oil and Gas Pipelines Systems
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter- 7
2.7 ISO Standard:
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
ISO 9712 Nondestructive Testing—Qualification and Certi-
1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-
fication of NDT Personnel
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
3. Terminology
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
3.1 Definitions:
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
3.1.1 Definitions relating to ultrasonic examination, that
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
appear in Terminology E1316 shall apply to the terms used in
this practice.
2. Referenced Documents
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
2.1 The following documents form a part of this practice to
3.2.1 acceptance criteria—definition of acceptable/
the extent specified herein:
rejectable flaws as defined by an Engineering Critical Assess-
2.2 ASTM Standards:
ment (ECA), such as defined in CSA-Z662 or API 1104, or
E164 Practice for Contact Ultrasonic Testing of Weldments
workmanship criteria as defined by the contracting agency.
E317 Practice for Evaluating Performance Characteristics of
AvailablefromAmericanSocietyforNondestructiveTesting(ASNT),P.O.Box
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E07 on Nonde- 28518, 1711 Arlingate Ln., Columbus, OH 43228-0518, http://www.asnt.org.
structive Testing and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E07.06 on Available fromAerospace IndustriesAssociation ofAmerica, Inc. (AIA), 1000
Ultrasonic Method. WilsonBlvd.,Suite1700,Arlington,VA22209-3928,http://www.aia-aerospace.org.
Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2021. Published November 2021. Originally Available from American Petroleum Institute (API), 1220 L. St., NW,
approved in 1998. Last previous edition approved in 2016 as E1961 – 16. DOI: Washington, DC 20005-4070, http://www.api.org.
10.1520/E1961-16R21. Available from Canadian Standards Association (CSA), 5060 Spectrum Way,
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or Mississauga, ON L4W 5N6, Canada, http://www.csa.ca.
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Available from International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Central Secretariat, BIBC II, Chemin de Blandonnet 8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier,
the ASTM website. Geneva, Switzerland, http://www.iso.org.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E1961 − 16 (2021)
3.2.2 contract document—any document specified in the examination sections (zones) each being assessed by a pair of
contractbetweenthecontractingagencyandcontractor,includ- ultrasonic search units. See Fig. 1 for typical zones.
ing the purchase order, specification, drawings or other written
4.3 Thicknesses of material examined are normally 7 to 25
material.
mm (0.28 to 1.00 in.) and pipe diameters 15 cm (6.0 in.) and
3.2.3 contracting agency—a government agency, prime
greater but this standard may apply to other thicknesses and
contractor or subcontractor procuring ultrasonic examination
diameters if the techniques can be proven to provide the
services.
required zonal discrimination.
3.2.4 contractor—the nondestructive examination contrac-
4.4 Examination zones are typically 2 to 3 mm (0.08 to 0.12
tor engaged by the contracting agency in work covered by this
in.) in height. For most applications this will require the use of
practice.
contact focused search units to avoid interfering signals origi-
3.2.5 mapping type presentations—an ultrasonic image pre-
nating from off-axis geometric reflectors and to avoid exces-
sentation whereby the digitizedA-scan signal is represented as
sive overlap with adjacent zones.
colors or grayscale for amplitude variation along one axis
representing time of flight and the other axis is the sampling
5. Basis of Application
position, or the distance along the weld.
5.1 The following items are subject to contractual agree-
3.2.6 operator(s)—the term “operator(s)” as used in this
ment between the parties using or referencing this standard.
practice shall mean the operator(s) of ultrasonic equipment
who is (are) certified according to the requirements in 5.2 and 5.2 Personnel Qualification:
at a level deemed acceptable to the contracting agency.
5.2.1 If specified in the contractual agreement, personnel
performing examinations to this standard shall be qualified in
4. Significance and Use
accordance with a nationally or internationally recognized
NDT personnel qualification practice or standard such as
4.1 This practice is intended primarily for the mechanized
ANSI/ASNT-CP-189, SNT-TC-1A, NAS-410, ISO 9712, or a
ultrasonic examination of pipe girth welds used in the con-
similar document and certified by the employer or certifying
struction of gas and oil pipelines. This practice, with appropri-
agency, as applicable. The practice or standard used and its
ate modifications due to changes in weld profile, may also be
applicable revision shall be identified in the contractual agree-
used to examine repaired welds. Manual techniques such as
ment between the using parties.
described in Practice E164 may also be used to examine
production or repaired welds. This practice, with appropriate
5.3 Qualification of Nondestructive Agencies—If specified
modifications, may also be used to examine other forms of butt
in the contractual agreement, NDT agencies shall be qualified
welds including long seams.
and evaluated as described in Practice E543. The applicable
4.2 Techniques used are to be based on zonal discrimination edition of Practice E543 shall be specified in the contractual
whereby the weld is divided into approximately equal vertical
agreement.
FIG. 1 Schematic Representation of Weld Zones and Discontinuities
E1961 − 16 (2021)
5.4 Procedures and Techniques—The procedures and tech- simple amplitude and transit time recording and shall be from
niques to be used shall be as specified in the contractual 0 to 100 % for B-scan or “mapping” type recording of data.
agreement. Tworecordablesignaloutputspergateshallbeavailable,being
either analog or digital and representative of signal height and
5.5 Surface Preparation—The pre-examination surface
time of flight. These will be suitable for recording on a
preparation criteria shall be in accordance with 10.2, unless
multi-channel recorder or computer data acquisition software
otherwise specified.
display.
5.6 Timing of Examination—The timing of examination
7.2 Recording System:
shall be in accordance with 10.3, unless otherwise specified.
7.2.1 A distance measuring circuit or device suitable for
5.7 Extent of Examination—The extent of examination shall
connection to the recorder or acquisition system shall provide
be in accordance with Section 8, unless otherwise specified.
a means of electronically determining circumferential weld
5.8 Reporting Criteria/Acceptance Criteria—Reporting cri- distance to an accuracy of typically 61 cm (0.4 in.) or better,
as required by the contracting agency, over the circumference
teria for the examination results shall be in accordance with
of the weld (an optical encoder is typically used for such
Section 11, unless otherwise specified. Since acceptance crite-
ria are not specified in this standard, they shall be specified in distance measurement). Programmed scan lengths shall be
sufficient to ensure all probes will travel the maximum circum-
the contractual agreement.
ferentialdistancerequiredforapipehavingadiameterwiththe
5.9 Reexamination of Repaired/Reworked Items—
maximumtoleranceallowedbythecontractingagency’sspeci-
Reexamination of repaired/reworked items is not addressed in
fication. For equipment with encoders traveling on a track or
this standard and if required shall be specified in the contrac-
welding guide-band a correction factor will be incorporated to
tual agreement.
ensure the circumferential distance recorded on the chart
corresponds to the search unit position on the pipe outer
6. Examination Methods
surface.The recording or marking system shall clearly indicate
6.1 Visual Examination—All welds shall be visually exam-
the location of discontinuities relative to the marked starting
ined after completion and assessed in accordance with the
position of the scan, with a 61 cm (0.4 in.) accuracy. There
requirements of surface conditions for ultrasonic examination.
shall be recordings from each search unit for weld discontinui-
6.2 All bevels shall be examined immediately after machin-
ties and confirmation of the acoustic coupling arranged on the
ing to ensure compliance with the applicable welding proce-
chart or display in a manner acceptable to the contracting
dure. This examination should be combined with scribing the
agency.
reference line as described in 10.4.
7.2.2 B-scan or other form of “mapping” displays will be
used for volumetric flaw detection and characterizations and
6.3 Any items of non-compliance shall be referred to the
Time of Flight Diffraction (TOFD) techniques may be added to
contracting agency representative for corrective action.
improve characterization and sizing. TOFD techniques may
6.4 Ultrasonic Examination—All girth welds identified for
augment pulse-echo techniques but shall not replace pulse-
mechanized ultrasonic examination shall be examined for
echo techniques.
100 % of their circumference and assessed in accordance with
7.2.3 Where TOFD techniques are employed the recording
the contracting agency’s acceptance criteria. Examination
system shall be capable of a 256-level grayscale display and be
should be conducted in accordance with procedures approved
capable of recording full R-F wave forms for the TOFD search
by the contracting agency.
unit pairs.
7. Ultrasonic Equipment
7.3 Coupling—The coupling shall be obtained by using a
medium suitable for the purpose. An environmentally safe
7.1 Ultrasonic System—The system shall provide an ad-
wetting agent may be required to enhance acoustic coupling.
equate number of examination channels to ensure the complete
No residue should remain on the pipe surface after the liquid
volumetric examination of the weld through thickness in one
has evaporated. For examination where ambient temperatures
circumferential scan.The instrument shall provide a linear “A”
arebelow0°C(32°F)amethylalcoholwasherfluidorasimilar
scan presentation for each channel selected. The examination
medium may be used. This liquid medium may be recovered
channels will allow the volume of the weld scanned to be
and filtered for re-use. For examination where pipe cool-down
assessed in accordance with the examination zones as typically
mayberequiredafterwelding,watersprayorotheragentsmay
defined in Fig. 1. Instrument linearity shall be determined
be used with contracting agency approval.
according to the procedures detailed in Practice E317, within
six months of the intended end use date. The contractor shall
7.4 Search Units:
retain a copy of the calibration certificate. Instrument linearity
7.4.1 Each search unit shall be marked with a method to
shall be such that the accuracy of any indicated amplitude is
identify the manufacturer’s name, search unit type, exit point,
within 5 % of the actual full scale amplitude. This shall apply
incident beam angle or refracted beam angle for a specific
to both linear and logarithmic amplifiers. Each examination
wedge/steel velocity ratio, frequency, and crystal size.
channel shall be selective for: pulse-echo or through-
transmission mode, gate position and length for a minimum of
two gates, and gain. Recording thresholds shall be selectable to
For phased array and EMAT probes, not all of the listed items may be
display signals between 0 and 100 % of full screen height for applicable.
E1961 − 16 (2021)
7.4.2 The search unit array design shall be specific to the 8. Ultrasonic Examination Set-Up
project where the examination is to be performed.
8.1 Search Unit Positioning and Primary Reference
7.4.3 All search units shall be contoured to match the
Sensitivity—The system shall be optimized for field examina-
curvature of the pipe surface.
tion using the reference standard. Each search unit shall be
positioned at its operating distance from the simulated weld
7.5 ReferenceStandards—Referencestandardsshallbeused
cent
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.