ASTM D5861-07(2017)
(Guide)Standard Guide for Significance of Particle Size Measurements of Coating Powders
Standard Guide for Significance of Particle Size Measurements of Coating Powders
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This guide describes the need to specify the measuring technique used whenever quoting the particle size distribution of a coating powder.
4.2 This guide is for use by manufacturers of coating powders and by specifiers for process control and product acceptance.
SCOPE
1.1 This guide covers the significance of referencing the techniques used whenever specifying the particle size distribution of a coating powder.
1.2 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: D5861 −07 (Reapproved 2017)
Standard Guide for
Significance of Particle Size Measurements of Coating
Powders
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D5861; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 4.2 This guide is for use by manufacturers of coating
powders and by specifiers for process control and product
1.1 This guide covers the significance of referencing the
acceptance.
techniques used whenever specifying the particle size distribu-
tion of a coating powder.
5. Particle Size of Coating Powders
1.2 This international standard was developed in accor-
5.1 The size of the particles comprising a coating powder
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
plays a critical role in the fluidization, application, and recla-
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
mation of the powder, and in the final appearance of the coated
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
part. Coating powders are comprised of particles of widely
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
differing sizes, from as low as about 1 µm to as high as about
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
150 µm. Collectively, the individual particles form a size
2. Referenced Documents distribution, defined by the percentages of particles present of
2 a given size or within a given size range. There are generally
2.1 ASTM Standards:
few particles at the low and high ends of the distribution, the
D1921 Test Methods for Particle Size (Sieve Analysis) of
majority being in the 25 to 65-µm range. The distribution can
Plastic Materials
be described by an actual plot of the particle size distribution,
D3451 Guide for Testing Coating Powders and Powder
or by numerical attributes of the distribution, such as the
Coatings
calculated values of its mean, median, mode, and span. The
3. Terminology mean represents the average particle size (the sum of all the
particle sizes divided by the number of particles). The median
3.1 Definitions:
represents a size such that half the particles are larger than it
3.1.1 coating powders, n—these are finely divided particles
and half the particles are smaller than it. The mode represents
of organic polymer that generally contain pigments, fillers, and
the most frequently occurring particle size. For all coating
additives and that remain finely divided during storage under
powders these three figures are numerically different. The span
suitable conditions.
is an indication of the width of the particle size distribution.
3.1.2 powder coatings, n—these are coatings that are
Referring to Table A1.1, the span is calculated by subtracting
protective, decorative, or both; and that are formed by the
the d10 from the d90 and then dividing by the d50 or median
application of a coating powder to a substrate and fused into
particle size.
continuous films by the application of heat or radiant energy.
5.2 The particle size distribution is generally chosen by the
4. Significance and Use
coating powder manufacturer from knowledge of the applica-
tion technique, the required cured film thickness, surface
4.1 This guide describes the need to specify the measuring
appearance, and performance. Once the desired particle size
technique used whenever quoting the particle size distribution
distribution has been selected, it needs to be monitored to
of a coating powder.
ensure consistency from batch to batch and, indeed, within
each batch. Occasionally the coating powder applicator may
This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on Paint and
specify the particle size from knowledge of the specific
Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications and is the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee D01.51 on Powder Coatings.
application equipment or customer requirements, or both.
Current edition approved June 1, 2017. Published June 2017. Originally
5.3 It is important for all involved to understand that the
approved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2013 as D5861 – 07 (2013).
DOI: 10.1520/D5861-07R17.
numerical data comprising a particle size distribution are
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
significantlydependentonthetechniqueusedtoobtainthem.It
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
is, therefore, of little use to quote or specify a particle size
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website. distribution, and even less a single particle size, without also
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D5861 − 07 (2017)
defining the technique used to obtain that measurement, or, if nique. Participants included coating powder manufacturers,
a single size, whether it is, for example, the mean, median or raw material suppliers to the powder coating market, and
modal value. manufacturers of particle size measuring equipment.
7.2 The data obtained can be found in AnnexA1 and Annex
6. Measurement of Particle Size
A2. They have been transposed into two respective standard
6.1 There are a wide variety of instruments currently avail-
formats for ease of comparison. Where possible, additional
able for measuring the particle size distributions of coating
numerical data were extracted from the original plots of
powders. Actual sieving, such as described in Test Methods
particle size distribution. In these instances, such figures are
D1921, where the percentage weight of coating powder re-
enclosed in parentheses in Annex A1 (see Figs. A1.1-A1.14).
tained on sieves of known mesh size is measured, is relatively
Some of the original plots of particle size distribution were
inexpensive and direct. It is, however, significantly slower than
replotted for clarity, with a consistent ordinate and abscissa, of
indirect measurement techniques, such as laser scattering and “percentage of particles in a given range” and “log (particle
electrolytic conductivity, such as described in Guide D3451.
size in µm)” respectively. These standardized distributions
With indirect measurement techniques, a secondary effect, constitute Figs. A1.1-A1.14.
induced by the presence of the coating powder particles, is
7.3 It can be seen that there are distinct differences between
measured, such as changes in light scattering or in the
the data acquired by different techniques, and by the same
conductivity of an electrolyte. These effects are analyzed using
technique when the machine manufacturer or model is
a specific theoretical algorithm, unique to the measurement
changed.There are even differences when instruments with the
technique, and the particle size distribution calculated that
same model number are used in different laboratories.
would cause the measured changes. Various other statistical
7.4 It must be emphasized that these data are not presented
data on the distributions, such as the mean, the median, the
in order to recommend one measurement technique over
mode, and the span are also often automatically calculated.
another, or one participating piece of equipment over another
6.2 Secondary measurement techniques make assumptions
nonparticipating piece of equipment, but rather to clearly
such as the measured particles being spherical, and do not
illustrate the necessity of defining how a size measurement is
acknowledge the fractured, randomized shapes the particles
obtained when quoting any numerical value regarding particle
actuallypossess.Othersrequirethepreparationofasuspension
size.
of the particles in a liquid, which could alte
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.