iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
CEN

FprEN 9239

(Main)

Aerospace series - Programme management - Recommendations to implement risk management and opportunity management

Aerospace series - Programme management - Recommendations to implement risk management and opportunity management

This document enables the specific needs of the aeronautical, space and defence fields to be met. It can also apply to other fields.
However, the specificity of some fields can lead to the use of existing sectorial standards such as EN 16601-80, Space project management - Risk management (derived from ECSS-M-80).
This document:
-   proposes a framework for implementing organization of risk management and opportunity management within programme management; this framework may serve as a basis for writing risk management specifications and opportunity management specifications;
-   describes a process for keeping programme risks within the defined limitations that are considered tolerable; this standard process can be used as a methodological guide for writing the programme risk control plan;
-   describes a process for addressing and developing opportunities that have positive consequences on the execution of a programme; this standard process can be used as a methodological guide for writing the strategic programme opportunity control plan;
-   recognizes the need for knowledge management in order to capitalize and to share lessons learned with other programmes, as well as the maturity assessment of the risk management and opportunity management processes;
-   identifies useful documents for risk management and opportunity management;
-   proposes an example of a typical list of risks and opportunities.

Luft- und Raumfahrt - Programm-Management - Empfehlungen zur Umsetzung für Risikomanagement und Gelegenheitsmanagement

Série aérospatiale - Management de programme - Recommandations pour la mise en œuvre du management des risques et du management des opportunités

Le présent document permet de répondre aux besoins spécifiques des domaines aéronautique, spatial et de défense. Il peut également s'appliquer à d'autres domaines.
Cependant, la spécificité de certains domaines peut conduire à l'utilisation de normes sectorielles existantes telles que l’EN 16601-80, Systèmes spatiaux - Management des risques (issue de l'ECSS M 80).
Le présent document :
-   propose un cadre pour mettre en place une organisation du management des risques et du management des opportunités dans le management de programme ; ce cadre peut guider la rédaction de spécifications de management des risques et de spécifications de management des opportunités ;
-   décrit un processus pour maintenir les risques du programme dans des limites définies et jugées acceptables ; ce processus type peut servir de guide méthodologique pour la rédaction du plan de maîtrise des risques du programme ;
-   décrit un processus pour traiter et développer les opportunités ayant des conséquences positives sur le déroulement d’un programme ; ce processus type peut servir de guide méthodologique pour la rédaction du plan stratégique de maîtrise des opportunités du programme ;
-   inclut la nécessité d’organiser la mémoire collective pour capitaliser et partager avec d’autres programmes les leçons apprises, ainsi que l’évaluation de la maturité des processus de management des risques et de management des opportunités ;
-   précise la documentation utile au management des risques et au management des opportunités ;
-   propose un exemple de liste type de risques et d’opportunités.

Aeronavtika - Vodenje programov - Priporočila za obvladovanje tveganja in upravljanje priložnosti

General Information

Status
Not Published
Publication Date
28-Jul-2024
ICS
49.020 - Aircraft and space vehicles in general
Technical Committee
ASD-STAN - Aerospace
Drafting Committee
ASD-STAN/D 1/WG 14 - Risk management
Current Stage
5020 - Submission to Vote - Formal Approval
Start Date
29-Feb-2024
Completion Date
29-Feb-2024
Ref Project
kSIST FprEN 9239:2024 - Aerospace series - Programme Management - Recommendations to implement risk management and opportunity management

Relations

Revises
EN 9239:2016 - Aerospace series - Programme Management - Guide for the risk management
Effective Date
18-Jan-2023

Buy Standard

prEN 9239:2023 - BARVEprEN 9239:2023 - BARVE
PreviousNext
Draft
prEN 9239:2023 - BARVE
English language
68 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
oSIST prEN 9239:2023
01-april-2023
Nadomešča:
SIST EN 9239:2016
Aeronavtika - Vodenje programov - Priporočila za obvladovanje tveganja in
upravljanje priložnosti
Aerospace series - Programme Management - Recommendations to implement risk
management and opportunity management
Luft- und Raumfahrt - Programm-Management - Empfehlungen zur Umsetzung für
Risikomanagement und Gelegenheitsmanagement
Série aérospatiale - Management de Programme - Recommandations pour la mise en
œuvre du management des risques et du management des opportunités
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: prEN 9239
ICS:
03.100.01 Organizacija in vodenje Company organization and
podjetja na splošno management in general
49.020 Letala in vesoljska vozila na Aircraft and space vehicles in
splošno general
oSIST prEN 9239:2023 en,fr,de
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 9239:2023

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 9239:2023


DRAFT
EUROPEAN STANDARD
prEN 9239
NORME EUROPÉENNE

EUROPÄISCHE NORM

February 2023
ICS 49.020 Will supersede EN 9239:2016
English Version

Aerospace series - Programme Management -
Recommendations to implement risk management and
opportunity management
Série aérospatiale - Management de Programme - Luft- und Raumfahrt - Programm-Management -
Recommandations pour la mise en œuvre du Empfehlungen zur Umsetzung für Risikomanagement
management des risques et du management des und Gelegenheitsmanagement
opportunités
This draft European Standard is submitted to CEN members for enquiry. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee ASD-
STAN.

If this draft becomes a European Standard, CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations
which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.

This draft European Standard was established by CEN in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other
language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC
Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.

Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are
aware and to provide supporting documentation.

Warning : This document is not a European Standard. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without
notice and shall not be referred to as a European Standard.


EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2023 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. prEN 9239:2023 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 9239:2023
prEN 9239:2023 (E)
Contents Page
European foreword . 4
Introduction . 5
1 Scope . 7
2 Normative references . 7
3 Terms and definitions . 7
4 Principles . 11
4.1 Integral part of management of the entire programme . 11
4.2 Incorporation of risks and opportunities . 12
4.2.1 Apprehension of risks and opportunities . 12
4.2.2 Assess
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

CEN
EN 9102:2024(Main)
Aerospace series - Quality systems - First article inspection requirements
SIST EN 9102:2024

1.1   General
This document establishes the requirements for performing and documenting FAI. It is emphasized the requirements specified in this document are complementary (not alternative) to customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.
1.2   Purpose
The primary purpose of FAI is to verify and validate product realization processes are capable of producing characteristics that meet engineering and design requirements. A well-planned and executed FAI by a multi-disciplinary team (e.g. members from responsible functions) provides objective evidence the manufacturer’s processes can produce compliant product; having effectively understood and incorporated the associated requirements.
NOTE   A FAI is not a product acceptance document. While interrelated, FAI and product acceptance are separate activities. The focus of FAI is verification of production processes via assessment of product. FAI and supporting documentation do not provide assurance regarding conformance for product acceptance purposes; neither does the lack of a FAI necessarily imply product is nonconforming to engineering and design requirements.
FAI will:
-   provide confidence, through objective evidence, the product realization processes are capable of producing conforming product;
-   demonstrate the manufacturers and processors of the product have an understanding of the associated requirements;
-   provide assurance of product conformance at the start of production and after changes, as outlined in this document.
A FAI is intended to:
-   mitigate risks associated with production startup and process changes;
-   reduce future escapes;
-   help ensure product safety;
-   improve quality, delivery, and customer satisfaction;
-   reduce costs and production delays associated with product nonconformances;
-   identify product realization processes not capable of producing conforming characteristics and initiate and/or validate associated corrective actions.
-
1.3   Application
This document applies to organizations and their suppliers responsible for product realization processes that produce the design characteristics of the product. The organization shall flow down the requirements of this document to suppliers who produce design characteristics.
This document also applies to suppliers performing special process(es). A certificate of conformance (CoC) provided by processors attests to satisfying the requirements. External suppliers providing special process(es) can satisfy this document's requirements by either:
-   documenting the design characteristics and associated results on a first article inspection report (FAIR); or
-   documenting the design characteristics and associated results on a detailed CoC.
This document applies to assemblies, sub-assemblies, and detail parts including castings, forgings, and modifications to standard catalogue or commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) items. Each of these items have a separate FAI.
Unless contractually required, this document does not apply to:
-   development and prototype parts that are not considered as part of the first production run;
-   procured standard catalogue item, COTS, or deliverable software. When these items are included in an assembly, they shall be documented in the index of part numbers in an assembly FAIR.
1.4   Informative
If there is a conflict between the requirements of this document, and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter takes precedence.
In this document, the following verbal forms are used:
-   "shall" indicates a requirement;
-   "should" indicates a recommendation;
-   "may" indicates a permission;
-   "can" indicates a possibility or a capability.
Information marked as "NOTE" is for guidance in understanding or clarifying the associated requirement .

  • Standard
    28 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
  • Draft
    26 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
CEN
EN 9163:2023(Main)
Aerospace series - Certificate of conformity requirements
SIST EN 9163:2024

This document provides a harmonized process and documentation requirements for the establishment of CoCs used to attest the conformity of aviation, space, and defence products (e.g. assemblies, sub-assemblies, equipment and systems, parts, material, software) or services. It includes a CoC template and supporting instructions on how to complete it.
When quoted by the customer in a contractual requirement, application of this document is mandatory. In other cases, its use is recommended, but if there is a conflict between the requirements of this document and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter take precedence.
This document can be used by other industries that require the use/application of a CoC.
Requirements for the establishment of Authorized Release Certificates (ARCs) [e.g. European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Form 1, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 8130-3 tag, Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) Form 038] by an external provider holding a production approval (for new aviation products, production, or spares) or maintenance approval (i.e. for in service repairs, modifications, after sales maintenance, overhaul activities, inspections) are not covered by this document, as applicable rules are defined by the aviation authorities having granted these approvals.

  • Standard
    12 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
CEN
EN 9104-1:2023(Main)
Aerospace series - Quality management systems - Part 1: Requirements for Certification of aviation, space, and defense
SIST EN 9104-1:2024

This document defines the industry-accepted requirements for the ICOP scheme, which provides confidence to ASD customers, that organizations with certification of their QMS, issued by accredited CBs, meet applicable AQMS standard requirements. The requirements in this document are applicable to all participants in the ICOP scheme. If there is a conflict between the requirements of this document, and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter takes precedence.

  • Standard
    50 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
CEN
EN 9104-3:2023(Main)
Aerospace series - Quality management systems - Part 3: Requirements for Aviation, Space, and Defence Auditor Training, Development, Competence, and Authentication
SIST EN 9104-3:2024

This document defines the minimum requirements for auditors, CBs, auditor authentication bodies (AABs), training provider approval bodies (TPABs), and training providers (TPs) who participate in the IAQG industry controlled other party (ICOP) scheme. The requirements in this document supplement those defined within the EN 9104-001, EN 9104-002, EN ISO/IEC 17021-1, and EN ISO/IEC 17021-3 standards.
Data protection for the parties subject to this document and other relevant requirements of the ICOP scheme are managed via bi-lateral contracts between the joint controllers of the data.

  • Standard
    28 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
CEN
EN 9103:2023(Main)
Aerospace series - Quality management systems - Variation management of key characteristics
SIST EN 9103:2024

1.1   General
This document is primarily intended to apply to new parts and products intended to be produced in an on-going production phase but can also be applied to parts currently in production (e.g., manufacturing, maintenance). This document is applicable to all production processes that influence the variation of KCs, as well as maintenance and service processes in which KCs are identified. It applies to organizations for assemblies and all levels of parts within an assembly, down to the basic materials including castings and forgings, and to organizations that are responsible for producing the design characteristics of the product.
The variation control process begins with product definition, typically stated in the design documentation (e.g., digital model, engineering drawing, specification) which identifies KCs, and leads to a variation management process for those KCs. This process may also be used for producer-identified KCs (e.g., process KCs, additional/substitute product KCs).
Producers and their subcontractors are responsible for flow down of the standard requirements to those external providers, who produce design characteristics and provide production and service provisions, to ensure that KCs conform to the customer’s requirements.
1.2   Purpose
This document is designed to drive the improvement of manufacturing and maintenance processes through adequate planning and effective management of KC variation. This focus is intended to improve uniformity (less variation or minimum variation of product KCs) and acceptance probability of the end-product.
NOTE   Control of a product or process KC per this document does not constitute, nor imply acceptance of the resulting product. If variation management, under this document, is to be part of an acceptance decision, the requirements need to be specified in the applicable product acceptance plan or contract.
1.3   Convention
The following conventions are used in this document:
-   "shall" indicates a requirement;
-   "should" indicates a recommendation;
-   "may" indicates a permission; and
-   "can" indicates a possibility or a capability.

  • Standard
    34 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
CEN
EN 9300-121:2023(Main)
Aerospace series - LOTAR - LOng Term Archiving and Retrieval of digital technical product documentation such as 3D CAD and PDM data - Part 121: Semantic representation of CAD 3D Explicit Geometry with Product and Manufacturing Information
SIST EN 9300-121:2024

1.1 Introduction
This document defines the requirements for the long term digital preservation of the Semantic Representation of Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI) with their possible links to the 3D explicit shape and geometry of single CAD parts. The goal is to preserve this 3D information, without loss, with respect to the geometry produced by the original CAD system, following the principles laid down in EN 9300 003 “Fundamentals and Concepts”.
The requirements of EN 9300 110 concerning the preservation of the 3D explicit shape shall apply within this Part.
The term “semantic representation” is defined in Clause 3 “Terms, definitions and abbreviations”.
1.2 In scope
The following outlines the total scope of EN 9300 121:
- machine-interpretable PMI “Semantic Representation” (Refer to clause 3 for definition);
- the association of the above with 3D geometric shapes;
- the possible association of the above with Presentation of 3D Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI), and 3D annotations as defined in EN 9300 120.
In EN 9300 121, the technology used to preserve this 3D information is based on semantic representation. The main use cases are Certification, Product Liability and Design re-use.
For the purpose of this document, the semantic definition is at the level that supports associative “Cross-highlighting” for the purpose of human readability.
1.3 Out of scope
The following is outside the scope:
- PMI presentation (defined in EN 9300 120);
- User defined attributes that are assigned to 3D geometric entities or at the part level. The archiving of the UDA is defined in EN 9300 120.
- How to preserve additional information:
- - property rights;
- - form features;
- - CAD Assemblies.
- The semantics of special Notes outside the scope of PMI: ITAR/EAR, proprietary, and title block information, etc.

  • Standard
    18 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
CEN
EN 9101:2023(Main)
Aerospace series - Quality management systems - Requirements for conducting audits of aviation, space, and defence quality management Systems
SIST EN 9101:2024

1.1   General
This document defines requirements for the preparation and execution of the audit process. In addition, it defines the content and composition for the audit reporting of conformity and process effectiveness to the EN 9100-series standards, the organization’s QMS documentation, and customer and statutory/regulatory requirements.
The requirements in this document are additions or represent changes to the requirements and guidelines in the standards for conformity assessment, auditing, and certification as published by ISO/IEC (i.e. ISO/IEC 17000:2020, ISO/IEC 17021 1). When there is conflict with these standards, the requirements of this document take precedence.
NOTE 1   In this document, the term “EN 9100-series standards” comprises the EN 9100, EN 9110, and EN 9120 standards; developed by the IAQG and published by various national standards bodies.
NOTE 2   In addition to this document, the IAQG publishes deployment support material on the IAQG website (see http://www.iaqg.org) that can be used by audit teams, when executing the audit process.
1.2   Application
This document is intended to be used for audits of EN 9100-series standards by Certification Bodies (CBs) for certification of organizations, under the auspices of the ASD industry certification scheme [also known as the Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) scheme]. The ICOP scheme requirements are defined in the EN 9104-series standards (i.e. FprEN 9104-1, prEN 9104-2, EN 9104 3).
NOTE   Relevant parts of this document can also be used by an organization in support of internal audits (1st party) and external audits at suppliers (2nd party).

  • Standard
    30 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
CEN
EN 9300-120:2023(Main)
Aerospace series - LOTAR - LOng Term Archiving and Retrieval of digital technical product documentation such as 3D CAD and PDM data - Part 120: CAD 3D explicit geometry with graphic product and manufacturing information
SIST EN 9300-120:2024

1.1 Introduction
This document defines the requirements for the long term digital preservation of the presentation of Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI) with their possible links to the 3D explicit shape and geometry of single CAD parts. The goal is to preserve this 3D information with respect to the geometry and related PMI produced by the original CAD system, following the principles laid down in EN 9300 003 “Fundamentals and Concepts”.
The requirements of EN 9300 110 “CAD mechanical 3D explicit geometry information” about the preservation of the 3D explicit shape shall apply within this document.
The meaning of terms "Presentation" and "Representation", defined in the EN 9300 100 “Common concepts for Long term archiving and retrieval of CAD 3D mechanical information” is required to understand this EN 9300 document.
1.2 In scope
The following outlines the total scope of this document:
- the Presentation of 3D geometrical dimension and tolerance, and 3D annotation attributes;
- their possible semantic links with 3D Geometric shape;
- User Defined Attributes: that are assigned to 3D geometric entities or at the part level.
For the purpose of this document, the semantic definition is at the level that supports associative “Cross-highlighting”, to illustrate the portion of the geometry to which a PMI element applies.
In this version, the technology used to preserve this 3D information is based on polyline and tessellated presentation. Polyline presentation is a conversion to lines and curves of all 3D annotations by the STEP interfaces of the CAD system, including validation properties.  Tessellated presentation is a conversion to tessellated curves and tessellated faces. The main use cases are the Certification and Product Liability of static information, however, re-use is also possible after the deletion of previous PMI and creation of new PMI (refer to clause 3 for definition).
1.3 Out of scope
The following is outside the scope:
- machine-interpretable PMI “Representation”;
- how to preserve additional information:
- - property rights;
- -form features;
- -machining features;
- CAD Assemblies.

  • Standard
    26 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
CEN
EN 9300-125:2023(Main)
Aerospace series - LOTAR - LOng Term Archiving and Retrieval of digital technical product documentation such as 3D, CAD and PDM data - Part 125: Explicit CAD assembly structure with Graphic Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI)
SIST EN 9300-125:2024

1.1 Introduction
This document defines the requirements for the long-term digital preservation of the presentation of Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI) with their possible links to the 3D explicit shape and geometry of CAD assembly structure. The goal is to preserve this 3D information, without loss, with respect to the geometry produced by the original CAD system, following the principles laid down in EN 9300 003 “Fundamentals and Concepts”.
This will allow the retrieval of the assembly structure including the placement information.
This standard extends EN 9300-115 “Explicit CAD Assembly Structure” by including assembly level PMI.
PMI for the assembly structure can be recorded in the same file as the geometry, can be in a nested assembly structure or the PMI will be contained in its own separate file (Side-Car).
The PMI elements shall be presented on the graphic level only (i.e. polyline, tessellated).
1.2 Out of scope
The following is outside the scope:
- The archiving of assembly Form Features.
- Semantic PMI representation is out of scope for this document.
- The geometry defined at assembly level is out of scope for this document.
(This document covers PMI at the assembly level only.)

  • Standard
    24 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
CEN
EN 9722:2023(Main)
Aerospace series - Architecture for integrated management of a system's health condition
SIST EN 9722:2023

This document is mainly aimed at all the trades which are actively involved in managing the health of a system.
Although it relies on examples of aeronautical systems, the expert group considers that this document is applicable for systems from other areas.
This document specifies the centralization of the health data for a fleet of systems, such as an aircraft fleet for example, to ensure consistency between stakeholders (operators, repair facilities, designers, etc.) and the management of its health card.

  • Standard
    67 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day