Space product assurance - Components reliability data sources and their use

This handbook identifies data sources and respective methods that can be used for reliability prediction of components. It proposes suitable data sources and an application matrix for component families.

Raumfahrtproduktsicherung - Datenquellen zur Bauteilezuverlässigkeit und ihre Anwendung

Assurance produit des projets spatiaux - Sources de données de fiabilité composants et leur utilisation

Zagotavljanje kakovosti proizvodov v vesoljski tehniki - Viri podatkov o zanesljivosti komponent in njihova uporaba

V tem priročniku so opredeljeni viri podatkov in ustrezne metode, ki jih je mogoče uporabiti za napoved zanesljivosti komponent. Podaja predloge za primerne vire podatkov in matrike uporabe za družine komponent.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
30-Nov-2021
Technical Committee
Current Stage
6060 - Definitive text made available (DAV) - Publishing
Start Date
01-Dec-2021
Due Date
29-Dec-2022
Completion Date
01-Dec-2021

Buy Standard

Technical report
TP CEN/TR 17602-30-08:2022 - BARVE
English language
30 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)


SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-februar-2022
Zagotavljanje kakovosti proizvodov v vesoljski tehniki - Viri podatkov o
zanesljivosti komponent in njihova uporaba
Space product assurance - Components reliability data sources and their use
Raumfahrtproduktsicherung - Datenquellen zur Bauteilezuverlässigkeit und ihre
Anwendung
Assurance produit des projets spatiaux - Sources de données de fiabilité composants et
leur utilisation
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN/TR 17602-30-08:2021
ICS:
03.120.99 Drugi standardi v zvezi s Other standards related to
kakovostjo quality
49.140 Vesoljski sistemi in operacije Space systems and
operations
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

TECHNICAL REPORT CEN/TR 17602-30-08

RAPPORT TECHNIQUE
TECHNISCHER BERICHT
December 2021
ICS 49.140
English version
Space product assurance - Components reliability data
sources and their use
Assurance produit des projets spatiaux - Sources de Raumfahrtproduktsicherung - Datenquellen zur
données de fiabilité composants et leur utilisation Bauteilezuverlässigkeit und ihre Anwendung

This Technical Report was approved by CEN on 22 November 2021. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee
CEN/CLC/JTC 5.
CEN and CENELEC members are the national standards bodies and national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium,
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy,
Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia,
Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom.

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre:
Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2021 CEN/CENELEC All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means Ref. No. CEN/TR 17602-30-08:2021 E
reserved worldwide for CEN national Members and for
CENELEC Members.
Table of contents
European Foreword . 4
1 Scope . 5
2 References . 6
3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms . 7
3.1 Terms from other documents .7
3.2 Abbreviated terms. 7
4 Selection of reliability data and methods . 8
4.1 Introduction .8
4.2 Selection process . 8
4.3 Description of data .11
4.3.1 Handbook reliability data .11
4.3.2 Manufacturer or user data .11
4.4 Selection criteria for input sources . 11
4.4.1 Reliability handbooks .11
4.4.2 Manufacturer or user data .12
4.5 Justification for choice .14
4.6 Instructions for use .15
4.6.1 Reliability handbooks .15
4.6.2 Manufacturer or user data .15
4.7 Considerations for reliability prediction for mechanical parts . 16
4.7.1 General . 16
4.7.2 Part failure data analysis .17
4.7.3 Empirical reliability relationships . 17
4.7.4 Analysis of the stress-strength . 17
4.7.5 Handbook data .18
4.8 Documentation .18
Annex A Potential data sources . 19
A.1 Introduction .19
A.2 EEE parts .19
A.2.1 AT&T reliability manual .19
A.2.2 FIDES (UTE C 80-811) .19
A.2.3 HRD5 .19
A.2.4 IEEE Gold Book .20
A.2.5 IRPH .20
A.2.6 MIL-HDBK-217 .20
A.2.7 PRISM (RAC / EPRD) .20
A.2.8 RDF 2000 (UTE C 80-810, IEC-62380-TR Edition 1) . 20
A.2.9 Siemens SN29500 .21
A.2.10 Telcordia SR-332 .21
A.3 Mechanical parts .21
A.3.1 NPRD-95 .21
A.3.2 NSWC-94/L07 - Handbook of Reliability Prediction Procedures for
Mechanical Equipment .22
Annex B Applicability and limitations of MIL-HDBK-217F . 23
B.1 Introduction .23
B.2 EEE families applicability matrix .23
B.3 EEE packages applicability matrix (based on paragraph 5.6 MIL-HDBK-217) 26
B.4 EEE part equivalent quality grades .26
Annex C Justification . 28
Bibliography . 30

Figures
Figure 4-1: Boundaries of ECSS-Q-HB-30-08 (inputs and outputs) .8
Figure 4-2: Selection process .9
Figure 4-3: Decision logic . 10
Figure 4-4: Selection of manufacturer or user data . 13

Tables
Table 4-1: Reliability handbook selection criteria .12
Table 4-2: Percentiles of the χ² Distribution at 60 % and 90 % confidence for n<30 . 16

Table B-1 : EEE families applicability matrix for MIL-HDBK-217 . 24
Table B-2 : EEE package applicability .26
Table B-3 : Designation of EEE part quality grades . 27

European Foreword
This document (CEN/TR 17602-30-08:2021) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/CLC/JTC 5
“Space”, the secretariat of which is held by DIN.
It is highlighted that this technical report does not contain any requirement but only collection of data
or descriptions and guidelines about how to organize and perform the work in support of EN 16602-30.
This Technical report (CEN/TR 17602-30-08:2021) originates from ECSS-Q-HB-30-08A.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such
patent rights.
This document has been prepared under a mandate given to CEN by the European Commission and
the European Free Trade Association.
This document has been developed to cover specifically space systems and has therefore precedence
over any TR covering the same scope but with a wider domain of applicability (e.g.: aerospace).
Scope
This handbook identifies data sources and respective methods that can be used for reliability prediction
of components. It proposes suitable data sources and an application matrix for component families.

References
EN Reference Reference in text Title
EN 16601-00-01 ECSS-S-ST-00-01 ECSS - Glossary of terms
EN 16602-30 ECSS-Q-ST-30 Space product assurance - Dependability
EN 16602-40 ECSS-Q-ST-40 Space product assurance - Safety
EN 16602-60 ECSS-Q-ST-60 Space product assurance - Electrical, electronic and
electromechanical (EEE) components
IEC 60050-191 International Electrotechnical Vocabulary - Chapter
191: Dependability and quality of service
Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms
3.1 Terms from other documents
For the purpose of this document, the terms and definitions from ECSS-S-ST-00-01 and IEC 60050-191
apply.
3.2 Abbreviated terms
For the purpose of this document, the abbreviated terms from ECSS-S-ST-00-01 apply.

Selection of reliability data and methods
4.1 Introduction
This handbook can be used whenever EEE and mechanical components reliability data or failure rates
are needed to perform quantitative dependability or safety analyses in accordance with ECSS-Q-ST-30
or ECSS-Q-ST-40.
The boundaries of this process are shown in Figure 4-1. Inputs are project requirements, handbook data
and manufacturer or user data. The selection process should consider selection criteria and methods of
use of data. Outputs are usually included in equipment reliability assessments. Selection is supported
by suitable justification.
Project
Requirements
Selection
Criteria
Equipment
Reliability
Assessment
Handbook
Methods for use of
Data and Selection Process
data
Methods
Justification
ECSS-Q-HB-30-08 Perimiter Outputs
Manufacturer/
User Data
Figure 4-1: Boundaries of ECSS-Q-HB-30-08 (inputs and outputs)
4.2 Selection process
The selection of a suitable methodology is made according to Figure 4-2. Where the customer requires
that a reliability prediction be computed according to a particular methodology, contractual
requirements are applicable.
The term “methodology” includes the process, data and equations as defined in a particular handbook
or prediction system.
Does the methodology
Does customer require any Use the required
Yes adequately address the Yes
particular methodology? methodology
component?
No
Use this document to select
Use the selected
No between a particular handbook or
methodology
manufacturing data
Figure 4-2: Selection process
In the case where there is no prescribed methodology, this handbook should be applied and a suitable
methodology should be selected.
In the case where the prescribed methodology does not adequately address the component under
consideration, this handbook should be applied and a suitable methodology should be selected.
In order to perform any reliability predictions, reliability data is needed as an input, and a suitable
methodology needs to be applied.
Figure 3 shows the decision logic that should be applied when selecting data sources. Data should be
obtained from the following sources, in order of preference:
• Handbook data
• Manufacturer or user data.
Start
Collect data on
Collect data on
application
components used
environment
Use scoring system
to examine
applicability of
methodology
Is there an applicable
Yes Use it
methodology
No
Use manufacturer/
User data
Figure 4-3: Decision logic
A description of data sources is given in clause 4.3.
The choice of a given data source is acceptable if it satisfies the criteria listed in clause 4.4. Data on the
handbook methodology, the components, environment and use should be collected. A suitable
methodology can be selected by using a weighted score ranking scheme, as described in clause 4.4.1.
The rationale for selection is justified according to clause 4.5.
A suitable methodology or instructions for use is described in clause 4.6.
If a handbook is determined to be not suitable for the component, then manufacturer or user data should
be used.
4.3 Descriptio
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.