FprCEN/TR 18358

Electronic fee collection - Interferences on CEN DSRC devices from radio local area network devices operating in the 5 GHz frequency range - Results of a test campaign

This document contains test results on RLAN interference to CEN DSRC devices, including the setup and execution of the tests, along with the main findings

Elektronische Gebührenerhebung - Funkstörung von CEN-DSRC-Geräten durch drahtlose Nahbereichsnetzwerk-Geräte, die im Frequenzbereich von 5 GHz betrieben werden - Ergebnisse einer Testkampagne

Perception de télépéage - Interférences provenant de réseaux locaux sans fil fonctionnant dans la gamme de fréquences de 5 GHz, sur des dispositifs CEN DSRC - Résultats d'une campagne de tests

Elektronsko pobiranje pristojbin - Motnje na napravah CEN DSRC zaradi naprav radijskega lokalnega omrežja, ki delujejo v frekvenčnem območju 5 GHz - Rezultati testne kampanje

Ta dokument vsebuje rezultate preskusov o motnjah RLAN na naprave CEN DSRC, vključno z nastavitvijo in izvedbo preskusov ter glavne ugotovitve.

General Information

• Status: Not Published
• Publication Date: 22-Jul-2026
• Technical Committee: CEN/TC 278 - Road transport and traffic telematics
• Drafting Committee: CEN/TC 278/WG 1 - Electronic fee collection and access control (EFC)
• Current Stage: 5020 - Submission to Vote - Formal Approval
• Start Date: 02-Apr-2026
• Due Date: 02-Oct-2025
• Completion Date: 02-Apr-2026
• Ref Project: kSIST-TP FprCEN/TR 18358:2026 - Electronic fee collection - Interferences on CEN DSRC devices from radio local area network devices operating in the 5 GHz frequency range - Results of a test campaign

Standards Content (Sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-junij-2026
Elektronsko pobiranje pristojbin - Motnje na napravah CEN DSRC zaradi naprav
radijskega lokalnega omrežja, ki delujejo v frekvenčnem območju 5 GHz - Rezultati
testne kampanje
Electronic fee collection - Interferences on CEN DSRC devices from radio local area
network devices operating in the 5 GHz frequency range - Results of a test campaign
Elektronische Gebührenerhebung - Funkstörung von CEN-DSRC-Geräten durch
drahtlose Nahbereichsnetzwerk-Geräte, die im Frequenzbereich von 5 GHz betrieben
werden - Ergebnisse einer Testkampagne
Perception de télépéage - Interférences provenant de réseaux locaux sans fil
fonctionnant dans la gamme de fréquences de 5 GHz, sur des dispositifs CEN DSRC -
Résultats d'une campagne de tests
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: FprCEN/TR 18358
ICS:
35.240.60 Uporabniške rešitve IT v IT applications in transport
prometu
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

FINAL DRAFT
TECHNICAL REPORT
RAPPORT TECHNIQUE
TECHNISCHER REPORT
April 2026
ICS
English Version
Electronic fee collection - Interferences on CEN DSRC
devices from radio local area network devices operating in
the 5 GHz frequency range - Results of a test campaign
Perception de télépéage - Interférences provenant de Elektronische Gebührenerhebung - Funkstörung von
réseaux locaux sans fil fonctionnant dans la gamme de CEN-DSRC-Geräten durch drahtlose
fréquences de 5 GHz, sur des dispositifs CEN DSRC - Nahbereichsnetzwerk-Geräte, die im Frequenzbereich
Résultats d'une campagne de tests von 5 GHz betrieben werden - Ergebnisse einer
Testkampagne
This draft Technical Report is submitted to CEN members for Vote. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC
278.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are
aware and to provide supporting documentation.

Warning : This document is not a Technical Report. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without
notice and shall not be referred to as a Technical Report.

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2026 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. FprCEN/TR 18358:2026 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 3
Introduction . 4
1 Scope . 5
2 Normative references . 5
3 Terms and definitions . 5
4 Symbols and abbreviated terms . 6
5 Main findings and conclusions . 8
6 Test setup. 9
6.1 General. 9
6.2 Test environment setup . 10
6.3 Mechanical test setup . 10
6.4 Electrical setup . 14
6.5 Interferer signal setup . 16
7 Test execution . 19
7.1 Participants . 19
7.2 Prerequisites of the test execution and evaluation . 19
7.2.1 General. 19
7.2.2 Performance criteria . 20
7.2.3 CEN DSRC power levels and CEN DSRC channel . 20
7.2.4 Presentation of the results . 20
8 Interference test results . 21
8.1 OBE test results . 21
8.1.1 Interference results from the communication zone centre . 21
8.1.2 Interference results at the communication zone start . 22
8.1.3 Interference results in communication zone centre vs. start . 23
8.1.4 Interferer frequency dependent results . 25
8.1.5 Interferer direction dependency . 28
8.2 RSE test results . 33
8.2.1 Calculation of the RSE properties . 33
8.2.2 Interferer direction dependency for an RSE . 34
8.2.3 Interferer bandwidth dependency of an RSE . 35
Bibliography . 36

European foreword
This document (FprCEN/TR 18358:2026) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 278
“Intelligent transport systems”, the secretariat of which is held by NEN.
This document is currently submitted to the Vote on TR.
Introduction
This document contains results of the test campaign on CEN dedicated short-range communication
(DSRC) technology that was conducted at the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) in
Ispra (Italy) during two weeks in August 2024.
CEN DSRC technology has been developed specifically to provide a reliable and effective communication
means for traffic and transport applications in single lane and high speed multilane free flow
environments. The aim of the test was to evaluate the effects of the radio interference caused by radio
local area network (RLAN) devices operating in frequency bands close to or within the 5,8 GHz CEN
DSRC frequency band, whilst noting that the CEN DSRC technology is adopted in the following European
Union regulations:
[1]
• European electronic toll service (EETS) (i.e. Directive (EU) 2019/520 and
[2]
Regulation (EU) 2020/204 )
[3],
• Tachographs in road transport (i.e. Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, Regulation (EU) 2020/1054)
[4]
Regulation (EU) 2021/1228 , Implementing Regulation 2016/799 and its Appendix 14 “Remote
[16]
communication function (DSRC)”
• Maximum authorised weights and dimensions for road motor vehicles (i.e. Directive (EU)
[17])
2015/719
Tests were performed based on the specifications in CEN/TS 18078.
Six victim devices, i.e. roadside equipment (RSE) and on-board equipment (OBE), used in the test
campaign have been provided, configured and operated by 5 manufacturers. The provided devices are
compliant to European standards for CEN DSRC electronic fee collection (EFC), aka as electronic road
tolling, i.e. EN 12253, EN 15509, ETSI EN 300 674-2-1 and ETSI EN 300 674-2-2. Results for high data
rate DSRC devices compliant to ETSI ES 200 674-1 are not included in this report.
Interrogators for a remote readout of the tachograph OBE and the weights and dimensions OBE use the
[6]
same DSRC technology . These OBE devices are mounted like an EFC OBE in trucks. The RSE mounting
geometry for this application is similar to the RSE test setup used in the test campaign as shown in
Figure 7. Therefore, the findings in this document relating to CEN DSRC EFC devices, especially those for
trucks when interrogated by a fixed compliance checking RSE, also apply to EU-regulated tachograph
devices.
1 Scope
This document contains test results on RLAN interference to CEN DSRC devices, including the setup and
execution of the tests, along with the main findings.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
EN ISO 17573-2, Electronic fee collection - System architecture for vehicle related tolling - Part 2:
Vocabulary (ISO 17573-2)
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions in EN ISO 17573-2 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp/
— IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
3.1
adjacent band
frequency band directly above or below to the CEN DSRC band with no gap in-between
3.2
blocking
performance reduction of a victim receiver caused by a radio signal at a frequency outside the
operational bandwidth of the victim receiver
3.3
DSRC line-of-sight
ideal line connecting the two DSRC devices, i.e. the RSE and OBE that together form the victim
system [3.10]
3.4
harmful interference
radio interference that obstructs or interrupts the communication or the functioning of a victim system
3.5
in band
frequency that is overlapped by the CEN DSRC band
3.6
interference
performance reduction of a victim system caused by a radio signal at a frequency within the operational
bandwidth of the victim system
3.7
out of band
frequencies outside the CEN DSRC band
3.8
test transaction
DSRC interaction made of a cycle of two related frames, the first one sent by the RSE and the second one
sent by the OBE
Note 1 to entry: The test transaction is part of a DSRC transaction that consists of an initialisation, a transaction
and a closing phase, according to ISO 14906. The transaction phase consists of EFC ECHO functions.
3.9
victim device
radio device that suffers harmful interference from another system (the interfering system)
Note 1 to entry: In this document, the victim device is the DSRC device that suffers from interference or blocking
caused by RLAN.
3.10
victim system
DSRC communication system consisting of RSE and OBE, suffering from interference by RLAN
transmissions
4 Symbols and abbreviated terms
For the purposes of this document, the following abbreviated terms apply.
BER bit error ratio
CBW channel band width
CEPT European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations
(In French: Conférence européenne des administrations des postes et
télécommunications)
CH channel
dB decibel
dBi decibel relative to isotropic radiation (unit of antenna gain)
DUT device under test
DSRC dedicated short-range communication
FER Frame error ratio
FSPL free space path loss
EFC electronic fee collection
ES ETSI Standard
ETSI European Telecommunication Standards Institute
JRC Joint Research Centre
OBE on-board equipment
OOB out of band
PSD power spectral density
QAM quadrature amplitude modulation
RFID radio frequency identification
RLAN radio local area network
RSE roadside equipment
RX receive
SRD short range device
S/I signal to interference ratio
For the purposes of this document, the following symbols apply.
@ at
𝑏𝑏 limit value of bend parameter in the FER fit function (3)
bend parameter to adjust the knee region of the FER fit function (3)
CarOBE1 First OBE intended to be used in passenger cars as DUT
CarOBE2 Second OBE intended to be used in passenger cars as DUT
CH # channel number
f frequency
F-F0 frequency relative to RLAN centre frequency
f CEN DSRC frequency
DSRC
f RLAN frequency
RLAN
azimuth angle of the RLAN transmitter (interferer)
γRLAN
OBU Rx CEN DSRC receive signal power level at the OBE
𝑃𝑃 RLAN power level at the DUT for a FER of 50%
50%
P RLAN power level at the DUT
RLAN
Θ elevation angle of the OBE
OBE
Θ elevation angle of the RLAN transmitter (interferer)
RLAN
Θ elevation angle of the RSE
RSE
RSE1 RSE used as DUT
𝑆𝑆/𝐼𝐼 signal to interference ratio for a FER of 50%
50%
slope slope parameter of the FER fit function (3)
�⃗ direction of OBE antenna main lobe
S
OBE
�⃗ direction of RSE antenna main lobe
S
RSE
TruckOBE1 First OBE intended to be used in trucks as DUT
TruckOBE2 Second OBE intended to be used in trucks as DUT
TruckOBE3 Third OBE intended to be used in trucks as DUT
𝑥𝑥 RLAN power level offset as input to the FER fit function (3)
5 Main findings and conclusions
This document summarizes the results from measurements undertaken to evaluate the interference of
RLAN signals to CEN DSRC devices. The measurement setup takes RLAN devices into account that
operate in different parts of the 5 GHz band (see Figure 1). In this document, RLAN equipment means
equipment that usually operates under the RLAN regulation (e.g. devices following the Wi-Fi®
specification). It is noteworthy that those devices can also operate above 5 725 MHz in accordance with
[12] [18]
the CEPT SRD recommendation and SRD regulation , when applying its requirements on
techniques to access spectrum and mitigate interference . The RLAN channels chosen for the
measurements in this document are in two different regulatory domains with different usage conditions,
which are not discussed in detail here. For simplicity, the interference signals and radio channels are
denoted RLAN signals and RLAN channels in this document independent from the regulatory regime in
Europe.
Key
Channel available under RLAN or SRD regulation
Channel used for testing
Figure 1 — RLAN channels used for CEN DSRC interference testing
In general, CEN DSRC performs reliably, even when exposed to some degree of interference or blocking.
However, the measurement results in subclause 8.2 show that the use of RLAN equipment within the
CEN DSRC frequency band can cause harmful interference to the CEN DSRC RSE, even at low power
levels. This makes the use of typical RLAN equipment such as Wi-Fi® devices within the CEN DSRC
frequency band in vehicles problematic , even when operating under the SRD regulation. Where RLAN
signals with a low power level coming from some distance are much less of a problem, since the
directivity of the RSE antennas is high and the RSE antennas are tilted down towards the road surface.
Out of band (OOB) emissions coming from RLAN devices operated in adjacent frequency bands, can be
a problem when the devices are in a vehicle, since they cause in-band interference to the RSE, which
[13]
might in some cases be harmful . Whilst OOB emissions from RLAN transmitters located further away
from the RSE are not critical due to the RSE antenna directivity as shown in subclause 8.2.2.

Techniques to access spectrum and mitigate interference that provide an appropriate level of performance to
[19]
comply with the essential requirements of Directive 2014/53/EU shall be used. If relevant techniques are
described in harmonised standards or parts thereof the references of which have been published in the Official
Journal of the European Union under Directive 2014/53/EU, performance at least equivalent to these techniques
shall be ensured. ETSI EN 300 440 is the harmonised standard for access to radio spectrum relevant for SRD.
European frequency regulation does not foresee RLAN applications in the frequency band from 5725 MHz to
5925 MHz. Nevertheless, Wi-Fi devices based on the RLAN specification are allowed to be used in Europe under
the SRD regulation with reduced transmit power level within the CEN DSRC frequency band from 5795 MHz to
5815 MHz.
This finding obtained for interference to the RSE is consistent with studies conducted by frequency
[13],[14]
regulators in the CEPT, in which the RSE has been the primary focus of investigations . The RSE
antenna directivity has been considered in such studies by considering a side lobe attenuation. The side
lobe attenuation of 15 dB used in the CEPT studies is consistent with the measurements reported in this
document. The side lobe attenuation reduces the necessary separation distance, although it remains
quite significant along the main lobe direction, to protect CEN DSRC from interference.
The measurement results in subclause 8.1 show that a CEN DSRC OBE is much less susceptible to
interference from RLAN signals within the CEN DSRC frequency band compared to a CEN DSRC RSE. For
the worst case where the interference signal is directed into the antenna main lobe of the interfered
device, this difference is in the order of 30 dB.
For the OBE, specific situations were found where interference caused by RLAN located at frequencies
outside the CEN DSRC frequency band might cause blocking in the OBE receiver, which reduces the
performance of the DSRC communication. Subclause 8.1.5 shows that this problem mainly arises when
the interferer is in front of the vehicle and in the main lobe of the OBE antenna, since the OBE antenna
points in the driving direction. There was only one blocking result measured from the back of an OBE.
This result shows 10 dB less interference susceptibility than from the front. Hence, a strong interferer
within the vehicle close to this measured OBE might cause blocking when it is directed straight to the
back of the OBE. For the more common cases where the interference signal is coming from the side of
the OBE, the interference signal can be 25 dB to 30 dB stronger than an interference signal coming from
the front to cause blocking, as confirmed by several measurements.
To address the risk of blocking to OBE and to further enhance the robustness of CEN DSRC in the future,
further standardization work (within CEN and ETSI) can be beneficial.
6 Test setup
6.1 General
The main aim of the interference test was to determine the level of harmful interference caused by RLAN
devices to transactions of CEN DSRC systems as a victim. In the experiments, a typical setup and
parameterisation was used to abstract from various situations found in practice. In the real usage
scenarios, the exchanged data between an RSE and an OBE (sequences of requests and responses)
differs for various EFC and interrogation applications. In addition, the down link from the RSE and the
responses of the OBE in the uplink are different in terms of data content, data rate, and frame duration.
To make the results comparable and independent of the CEN DSRC application, simple echo commands
were used as test transaction. Where the data sent by the RSE is sent back by the OBE, to focus on
measuring the frame error ratio (FER) and to simplify testing.
Different victim devices and measurement setups were used. They differ in the following points:
• the manufacturer and type of device under test (DUT);
• the OBE device type and mounting (either truck or passenger car use);
• the CEN DSRC power level (receive power level) at the OBE;
• the direction of the interference signal relative to the DUT;
• the bandwidth of the interference signal;
• the centre frequency of the interference signal.
The OBE has been positioned on a small screen made of laminated glass, a material which is also used
for not metallized windscreens of passenger vehicles. The size of the screen was 30 cm times 30 cm what
exceeds the dimensions of a typical OBE by at least 8 cm (along its “longest side”), which is more than a
wavelength of the used CEN DSRC and RLAN signals. This allows simple mounting of the OBE, while
maintaining similar radio propagation properties as in real passenger vehicle installations.
As far as the interferer is concerned, the RLAN emulator was set to transmit random sequences of data
packets to completely occupy the respective radio channel in time and frequency (worst case). A full
channel occupation was chosen to measure the packet error ratio as function of the incident interferer
power level independent of the interferer duty cycle.
A quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) was used for the RLAN interferer, since it caused the
strongest interference to the OBE.
6.2 Test environment setup
The test environment (the shielded chamber laboratory VELA-9) has been offered and configured by
the Sustainable, Smart and Safe Mobility Unit (JRC.C.4) of the European Commission’s JRC, in Ispra
(Italy).
The setup of the vector signal generator for the interfering signal has been prepared and operated by
JRC personnel.
RLAN waveforms were calculated by use of MATLAB ® (Release 2023b) and the WLAN Toolbox
(Release 2023b) by JRC personnel. A complete description of the interfering device can be found in the
[5]
JRC Test report .
6.3 Mechanical test setup
Interference tests are specified in CEN/TS 18078.
The victim devices were either mounted on a pole (to emulate the installation of an RSE) or on a tripod
behind a windscreen (OBE), resembling typical installations of EFC and interrogation stations.
Figure 2 shows the elevation view of the test setup with the elevation angles and an OBE as DUT.
For all setups, the RSE was mounted in such a way that the main lobe of its antenna pointed towards the
phase centre of the OBE antenna. Since the OBE receive (RX) power level at this point was determined,
only the elevation difference between the RSE and OBE antenna main lobes is relevant for the
interference evaluation.
The RLAN antenna pointed towards the phase centre of the DUT antenna with an elevation of 0°, i.e. it
was at the DUT level. It was moved around the DUT in the horizontal plane where an interferer azimuth
of 0° relates to interference coming from the direction of the DUT antenna main lobe azimuth.
For the RSE measurement a simplified setup as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 7 was used, where the RSE,
the OBE, and the RLAN antenna were mounted on the same level.
The Monitor antenna (④ in Figure 4) was used to monitor the proper function of the RLAN and the CEN
DSRC signal.
Figure 2 — Elevation of the test setup geometry for an OBE as DUT

Figure 3 — Simplified test setup for an RSE as DUT
The test setup parameters listed in Table 1 were used for testing.
Table 1 — Common parameters used for the test setups

DUT type
Parameter Unit Car OBE Truck OBE RSE
CEN DSRC RSE elevation ° -45 -45 0
CEN DSRC OBE elevation ° 45 0 0
RLAN elevation ° 0 0 0
CEN DSRC ECHO length Bytes 128 128 128
Figure 4 outlines the top view of the test setup.
The antenna main lobe of the RSE or OBE ① and the DUT ② were aligned to each other. If the DUT ②
was an OBE as shown in Figure 2, Figure 5, and Figure 6 then an RSE was mounted at position ①,
otherwise if the DUT was an RSE then an OBE was mounted at position ① as can be seen in Figure 7.
The RLAN interfering device antenna ③ was positioned at 1 m distance to the DUT at different
interferer incident azimuth angles in relation to the CEN DSRC line-of-sight path direction to perform
different test sequences.
The Monitor antenna ④ was used to monitor the proper function of the RLAN and the CEN DSRC signal.
NOTE For Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 it is assumed that the antenna main lobe is directed perpendicular
to the front of the device.
Figure 4 —Schematic top view of the test setup
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show a setup with the interferer ③ to an OBE as DUT ② being positioned outside
a vehicle at a 30° RLAN azimuth angle in relation to the CEN DSRC line-of-sight. The RSE ① has been
positioned at about 3 metres height to emulate a private vehicle at a fixed RSE.
Other measurements featured OBE and RSE positioned at the same level to simulate the readout of the
OBE by a mobile reader positioned at the roadside or on a vehicle, used for the interrogation of a
tachograph for a CEN DSRC compliance checking communication with commercial vehicles (trucks) as
shown in Figure 7.
Note that the monitor antenna ④ in the centre of Figure 5 was only used to monitor the correct
configuration of the test equipment. It was connected to a spectrum analyser operated by JRC personnel.
This antenna was also used in the preparation and calibration of the test setup to determine the CEN
DSRC down link power level at the position of the OBE and the interferer power level at the DUT.
Figure 5 — Total test setup view for an OBE as DUT

Figure 6 — Detailed test setup view for an OBE as DUT
Figure 7 — Total test setup view for an RSE as DUT
6.4 Electrical setup
Figure 8 shows the cabling of the test setup for an OBE as DUT. The cabling for an RSE as DUT was the
same, only the orientation of the interferer antenna ③ was changed to point towards the RSE.
Key
A Vector signal generator for the interference signal
A – B Cable with 2,5 dB insertion loss
E – F Cable with 2,6 dB insertion loss
F Signal analyser
① RSE connected via Ethernet with a laptop
② OBE behind a windscreen
③ Interferer antenna: Double ridged horn antenna with an antenna gain as listed in Table 2
④ Monitor antenna: Double ridged horn antenna for monitoring and measuring the CEN DSRC down link and
interferer power level
The incident power level of the RLAN interference signal at the location of the DUT CEN DSRC antenna
was calculated for all used RLAN channels with the free-space propagation model using the free space
path loss (FSPL) and the characteristics of the RLAN test antenna and the measured RLAN antenna cable
characteristics presented in Table 2.
Figure 8 — Cabling of the test setup for an OBE as DUT
Table 2 — RLAN interference antenna and cable characteristics
Frequency A-B Cable B-C Antenna gain at C-D 1m FSPL Path loss
loss 1m
(MHz) (dB) (dBi) (dB) (dB)
5210 1,65 10,9 46,78 37,53
5530 1,70 11,2 47,30 37,80
5775 1,74 10,6 47,68 38,82
5785 1,74 10,6 47,69 38,83
5795 1,75 10,6 47,71 38,86
5805 1,74 10,6 47,72 38,86
5825 1,75 10,5 47,75 39,00
5835 1,75 10,5 47,77 39,02
6.5 Interferer signal setup
The interferer has been set to transmit in the channels listed in Table 3, taken from CEN/TS 18078.
Table 3 — Interferer transmission channels
RLAN channel Centre Bandwidth RLAN band type with respect to
(802.11ac, 802.11ax) frequency (MHz) (MHz) the CEN DSRC band
(5795-5815 MHz)
Channel 161 5805 5795–5815 (20 MHz)
Channel 159 5795 5775–5815 (40 MHz) In-band
Channel 155 5775 5735–5815 (80 MHz)
Channel 157 5785 5775–5795 (20 MHz)
Channel 165 5825 5815–5835 (20 MHz) Adjacent band
Channel 167 5835 5815-5855 (40 MHz)
Channel 106 5530 5490–5570 (80 MHz)
OOB, non-adjacent
Channel 42 5210 5170–5250 (80 MHz)
The channels listed in Table 3
...