CEN/TS 13001-3-2:2004
(Main)Cranes - General design - Part 3-2: Limit states and proof of competence of wire ropes in reeving systems
Cranes - General design - Part 3-2: Limit states and proof of competence of wire ropes in reeving systems
This Part 3-2 of the Technical Specification EN 13001 is to be used together with Part 1 and Part 2 and as such they specify general conditions, requirements and methods to prevent mechanical hazards of wire ropes in reeving systems of cranes by design and theoretical verification.
NOTE 1 Specific requirements for particular types of crane are given in the appropriate Technical Specification for the particular crane type.
The following is a list of significant hazardous situations and hazardous events that could result in risks to persons during normal use and foreseeable misuse. Clauses 5 to 6 of this standard are necessary to reduce or eliminate the risks associated with the following hazard:
Exceeding the limits of strength.
This Technical Specification is applicable to cranes which are manufactured after the date of approval by CEN of this standard and serves as reference base for the Technical Specifications for particular crane types.
NOTE 2 prCEN/TS 13001-3-2 deals only with limit state method according to prEN 13001-1
Krane - Konstruktion allgemein - Teil 3-2: Grenzzustände und Sicherheitsnachweis von Drahtseilen in Seiltrieben
Dieser Teil 3-2 der Technischen Spezifikation EN 13001 ist zusammen mit Teil 1 und Teil 2 anzuwenden und
spezifiziert allgemeine Bedingungen, Anforderungen und Methoden zur Vermeidung von Gefahren bei Drahtseilen
in Seiltrieben von Kranen durch die Konstruktion und theoretische Überprüfung.
ANMERKUNG 1 Besondere Anforderungen für spezielle Krantypen sind in der zugehörigen Technischen Spezifikation für
den speziellen Krantyp angegeben.
Im Folgenden ist eine Auflistung von wichtigen gefährlichen Situationen und gefährlichen Ereignissen gegeben, die
Risiken für Personen während des normalen Gebrauchs (des Krans) und vorhersehbaren Missbrauchs zur Folge
haben könnten. Abschnitte 5 und 6 dieser Spezifikation sind erforderlich, um mit folgenden Gefahren verbundene
Risiken zu reduzieren oder zu eliminieren:
Überschreitung der Festigkeitsgrenzwerte.
Diese Technische Spezifikation gilt für Krane, die nach dem Datum der Genehmigung durch CEN hergestellt
werden, und dient als Referenzgrundlage für die Technische Spezifikation für spezielle Krantypen.
ANMERKUNG 2 CEN/TS 13001-3-2 berücksichtigt nur die Methode der Grenzzustände nach EN 13001-1.
Appareils de levage à charge suspendue - Conception générale - Partie 3-2 : États limites et vérification d'aptitude des systèmes de mouflage
La présente partie 3-2 de la Spécification Technique EN 13001 est à utiliser conjointement avec les parties 1 et 2 pour spécifier les conditions, prescriptions et méthodes générales permettant, par la conception et la vérification théorique, d'éviter les risques mécaniques dus aux systèmes de mouflage d'appareils de levage à charge suspendue.
NOTE 1 Les prescriptions spécifiques relatives aux types particuliers d'appareils de levage à charge suspendue sont données dans la Spécification Technique appropriée au type particulier d'appareil de levage à charge suspendue.
La liste suivante énumère les situations et les événements dangereux significatifs susceptibles d'entraîner des risques pour les personnes lors d'une utilisation normale ou d'une mauvaise utilisation prévisible. Les Articles 5 à 6 de la présente norme sont nécessaires pour réduire ou éliminer les risques associés au phénomène dangereux suivant :
Dépassement des limites de résistance.
La présente Spécification Technique s'applique aux appareils de levage à charge suspendue construits après la date d'approbation par le CEN de la présente norme, et sert de référence pour les spécifications techniques de types particuliers d'appareils de levage à charge suspendue.
NOTE 2 Le CEN/TS 13001-3-2 traite uniquement de la méthode des états limites selon l'EN 13001-1.
Dvigala (žerjavi) - Konstrukcija, splošno – 3-2. del: Mejna stanja in dokaz varnosti jeklenih vrvi pri vrvnih pogonih
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-marec-2005
Dvigala (žerjavi) - Konstrukcija, splošno – 3-2. del: Mejna stanja in dokaz varnosti
jeklenih vrvi pri vrvnih pogonih
Cranes - General design - Part 3-2: Limit states and proof of competence of wire ropes in
reeving systems
Krane - Konstruktion allgemein - Teil 3-2: Grenzzustände und Sicherheitsnachweis von
Drahtseilen in Seiltrieben
Appareils de levage a charge suspendue - Conception générale - Partie 3-2 : États
limites et vérification d'aptitude des systemes de mouflage
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN/TS 13001-3-2:2004
ICS:
53.020.20 Dvigala Cranes
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
CEN/TS 13001-3-2
SPÉCIFICATION TECHNIQUE
TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION
December 2004
ICS 53.020.20
English version
Cranes - General design - Part 3-2: Limit states and proof of
competence of wire ropes in reeving systems
Appareils de levage à charge suspendue - Conception Krane - Konstruktion allgemein - Teil 3-2: Grenzzustände
générale - Partie 3-2 : États limites et vérification d'aptitude und Sicherheitsnachweis von Drahtseilen in Seiltrieben
des systèmes de mouflage
This Technical Specification (CEN/TS) was approved by CEN on 18 March 2004 for provisional application.
The period of validity of this CEN/TS is limited initially to three years. After two years the members of CEN will be requested to submit their
comments, particularly on the question whether the CEN/TS can be converted into a European Standard.
CEN members are required to announce the existence of this CEN/TS in the same way as for an EN and to make the CEN/TS available
promptly at national level in an appropriate form. It is permissible to keep conflicting national standards in force (in parallel to the CEN/TS)
until the final decision about the possible conversion of the CEN/TS into an EN is reached.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia,
Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
Management Centre: rue de Stassart, 36 B-1050 Brussels
© 2004 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN/TS 13001-3-2:2004: E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents Page
Foreword.4
Introduction.5
1 Scope .5
2 Normative references .5
3 Terms, definitions, symbols and abbreviations .6
3.1 Terms and definitions .6
3.2 Symbols and abbreviations .6
4 General.8
5 Proof of static strength .8
5.1 General.8
5.2 Vertical hoisting.8
5.2.1 Design rope force .8
5.2.2 Inertial and gravitational effects.9
5.2.3 Rope reeving efficiency .10
5.2.4 Non parallel falls .11
5.2.5 Horizontal forces on the hoist load.11
5.3 Non vertical drives.12
5.3.1 Design rope force .12
5.3.2 Equivalent force.13
5.3.3 Inertial effects.14
5.3.4 Rope reeving efficiency .14
5.3.5 Non parallel falls .14
5.4 Limit design rope force .14
6 Proof of fatigue strength.15
6.1 General.15
6.2 Design rope force .16
6.2.1 Principle conditions .16
6.2.2 Inertial effects.16
6.2.3 Non parallel falls .17
6.2.4 Horizontal forces in vertical hoisting .18
6.3 Limit design rope force .18
6.3.1 Basic formula .18
6.3.2 Rope force history parameter.18
6.3.3 Rope force spectrum factor.19
6.3.4 Relative total number of bendings.19
6.3.5 Minimum rope resistance factor .20
6.4 Further influences on the limit design rope force.20
6.4.1 Basic formula .20
6.4.2 Diameters of drum and sheaves .20
6.4.3 Tensile strength of wire .21
6.4.4 Fleet angle .21
6.4.5 Rope lubrication.22
6.4.6 Multilayer drum .22
6.4.7 Groove radius.22
6.4.8 Rope types.23
Annex A (normative) Number of Relevant Bendings .24
Annex B (informative) Guidance for selection of design number of hoist ropes used during the useful
crane life .27
Annex C (informative) Selection of suitable set of crane standards for a given application.28
Bibliography.29
Figures
Figure 1— Example for the acting parts of hoist mass .9
Figure 2 — Example for Rope Reeving Efficiency .10
Figure 3 — Angle β .11
max
Figure 4— Horizontal force.12
Figure 5 — Examples for non vertical drive.13
Figure 6— Example for rope tightening .13
Figure 7 — Lifting positions .18
Figure 8 — Fleet angles .21
Figure 9 — Groove radius.22
Table 7 — Factor f .22
f6
Figure A.1 — Number of relevant bendings.26
Tables
Table 1 — Symbols and abbreviations.6
Table 2 — Partial safety factors γ .14
p
Table 3 — Minimum rope resistance factor γ .15
rb
Table 4 — Classes S of rope force history parameter s .19
R r
Table 5 — Reference ratio R .20
Dd
Table 6 — Factor f .22
f3
Table 7 — Factor f .22
f6
Table A.1 — Bending counts.24
Table A.2 — Examples for the number of relevant bendings w .25
Foreword
This document (CEN/TS 13001-3.2:2004) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 147 “Cranes —
Safety”, the secretariat of which is held by BSI.
The CEN/TC 147/WG 2 "Cranes — Design and Principles" is held by DIN.
According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following
countries are bound to announce this Technical Specification: Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark,
Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
This European Technical Specification is one Part o
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.