# SIST ISO 16107:2012

## Workplace atmospheres - Protocol for evaluating the performance of diffusive samplers

## Workplace atmospheres - Protocol for evaluating the performance of diffusive samplers

This International Standard specifies methods for evaluation of sampler performance in terms of workplace conditions: wind speed, humidity, temperature, atmospheric pressure, and analyte variation. The concise set of experiments specified aims to minimize cost to the user. The evaluation is limited to conditions commonly encountered in personal sampling in the indoor workplace setting, namely wind speeds of up to 0,5 m/s and for sampling periods typically from 2 h to 8 h. Static or area sampling, unlike personal sampling where movement of the subject is significant, may sometimes be subject to sampling-rate reduction due to stagnation at very low wind speeds. This International Standard therefore does not apply to wind speeds of less than 0,1 m/s relative to static samplers. Samplers are also tested for compliance with the manufacturer's stated limits on capacity, possibly in the presence of interfering compounds. Given a suitable exposure chamber, the sampler evaluation protocol can be extended to cover sampler use for other sampling periods and conditions.

## Air des lieux de travail - Protocole pour l'évaluation de la performance des dispositifs de prélèvement par diffusion

## Zrak na delovnem mestu - Protokol za vrednotenje lastnosti difuzijskih vzorčevalnikov

Ta mednarodni standard določa metode za vrednotenje lastnosti vzorčevalnikov na področju pogojev na delovnem mestu: hitrost vetra, vlažnost, temperatura, zračni tlak in variacija analita. Zgoščeni niz specificiranih preskusov je namenjen za zmanjšanje stroškov uporabnika. Vrednotenje je omejeno na pogoje, ki so pogosti pri osebnem vzorčenju v okolju notranjih delovnih mest, zlasti pri hitrosti vetra do 0,5 m/s in običajnih obdobjih vzorčenja od 2 do 8 h. Pri statičnem vzorčenju ali vzorčenju površin se lahko v nasprotju z osebnim vzorčenjem, pri katerem je pomembno gibanje predmeta, frekvenca vzorčenja zmanjša zaradi mirovanja pri zelo nizkih hitrostih vetra. Ta mednarodni standard se zato ne uporablja za hitrosti vetra, manjše od 0,1 m/s, za katere se uporabljajo statični vzorčevalniki. Preskuša se tudi skladnost vzorčevalnikov z omejitvami glede kapacitete, ki jih je navedel proizvajalec, če je mogoče v prisotnosti motečih komponent. Če je na voljo ustrezna komora za izpostavljanje, se lahko protokol za vrednotenje vzorčevalnikov razširi na uporabo vzorčevalnikov v drugih obdobjih in pogojih vzorčenja.

### General Information

### RELATIONS

### Standards Content (sample)

INTERNATIONAL ISO

STANDARD 16107

Second edition

2007-10-15

Workplace atmospheres — Protocol for

evaluating the performance of diffusive

samplers

Air des lieux de travail — Protocole pour l'évaluation de la performance

des dispositifs de prélèvement par diffusion

Reference number

ISO 16107:2007(E)

ISO 2007

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------

ISO 16107:2007(E)

PDF disclaimer

This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobe's licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but

shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In

downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobe's licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat

accepts no liability in this area.Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.

Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation

parameters were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In

the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below.

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT© ISO 2007

All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means,

electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or

ISO's member body in the country of the requester.ISO copyright office

Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20

Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11

Fax + 41 22 749 09 47

E-mail copyright@iso.org

Web www.iso.org

Published in Switzerland

ii © ISO 2007 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------

ISO 16107:2007(E)

Contents Page

Foreword............................................................................................................................................................ iv

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ v

1 Scope ..................................................................................................................................................... 1

2 Normative references ........................................................................................................................... 1

3 Terms and definitions........................................................................................................................... 2

4 Symbols and abbreviated terms ......................................................................................................... 2

5 Summary of test protocol .................................................................................................................... 3

5.1 Factors affecting performance ............................................................................................................ 3

5.2 “Accuracy” as providing a single performance value linking to measurement uncertainty........ 4

5.3 Bias, intersampler variability and the effects of environmental uncertainty.................................. 4

5.4 Reverse diffusion.................................................................................................................................. 5

5.5 Capacity — Control of effects from interfering compounds............................................................ 6

5.6 Capacity overload detection................................................................................................................ 6

5.7 Desorption efficiency ........................................................................................................................... 7

5.8 Atmospheric pressure.......................................................................................................................... 7

5.9 Wind direction ....................................................................................................................................... 7

5.10 Simplifications ...................................................................................................................................... 7

6 Apparatus .............................................................................................................................................. 7

6.1 Exposure chamber specifications ...................................................................................................... 7

6.2 Controlled environmental conditions................................................................................................. 8

6.3 Inter-run variability ............................................................................................................................... 8

7 Reagents and materials ....................................................................................................................... 9

8 Procedure .............................................................................................................................................. 9

9 Sampler performance classification................................................................................................... 9

10 Accuracy.............................................................................................................................................. 10

10.1 General................................................................................................................................................. 10

10.2 Accuracy range confidence limit ...................................................................................................... 10

10.3 Expanded uncertainty ........................................................................................................................ 11

11 Test report ........................................................................................................................................... 11

Annex A (informative) Worked example — Program for diffusive sampler accuracy range

calculation ........................................................................................................................................... 13

Annex B (informative) Calculation of variances............................................................................................ 15

Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................................... 16

© ISO 2007 – All rights reserved iii---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------

ISO 16107:2007(E)

Foreword

ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies

(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO

technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been

established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and

non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the

International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.

International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.

The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards

adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an

International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.

Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent

rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.

ISO 16107 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 146, Air quality, Subcommittee SC 2, Workplace

atmospheres.This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 16107:1999), which has been technically

revised.iv © ISO 2007 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------

ISO 16107:2007(E)

Introduction

Gas or vapor sampling is often accomplished by actively pumping air through a collection medium such as

activated charcoal. Problems associated with a pump, such as inconvenience, inaccuracy and expense, are

inextricable from this type of sampling. The alternative covered by this International Standard is to use

diffusion for moving the compound of interest onto the collection medium. This approach to sampling is

attractive because of the convenience of use and low total monitoring cost.However, previous studies have found significant problems with the accuracy of some samplers. Therefore,

although diffusive samplers may provide a plethora of data, inaccuracies and misuse of diffusive samplers

may yet affect research studies. Furthermore, worker protection may be based on faulty assumptions. The

aim of this International Standard is to counter the uncertainties in diffusive sampling through achieving a

broadly accepted set of performance tests and acceptance criteria for proving the efficacy of any given

diffusive sampler intended for use.This International Standard is intended specifically for the large-scale evaluation of many diffusive

sampler/analyte pairs of practical application and is complementary to EN 838. An affordable, experimental

evaluation determines a single performance value indicating how a sampler performs in a typical situation. A

sampler can thereby be quickly judged as to acceptability. Additionally, sufficient data are obtained to predict

performance in many atypical situations. For example, although sampling may normally be done at room

temperature, a particular need may call for use in extreme cold. In such a case, the single performance value

would be superseded by the particular needs.© ISO 2007 – All rights reserved v

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 16107:2007(E)

Workplace atmospheres — Protocol for evaluating the

performance of diffusive samplers

1 Scope

This International Standard specifies methods for evaluation of sampler performance in terms of workplace

conditions: wind speed, humidity, temperature, atmospheric pressure, and analyte variation. The concise set

of experiments specified aims to minimize cost to the user. The evaluation is limited to conditions commonly

encountered in personal sampling in the indoor workplace setting, namely wind speeds of up to 0,5 m/s and

for sampling periods typically from 2 h to 8 h.Static or area sampling, unlike personal sampling where movement of the subject is significant, may

sometimes be subject to sampling-rate reduction due to stagnation at very low wind speeds. This International

Standard therefore does not apply to wind speeds of less than 0,1 m/s relative to static samplers. Samplers

are also tested for compliance with the manufacturer's stated limits on capacity, possibly in the presence of

interfering compounds. Given a suitable exposure chamber, the sampler evaluation protocol can be extended

to cover sampler use for other sampling periods and conditions.This International Standard indicates how to measure diffusive sampler uncertainty for characterizing

concentration estimates obtained subsequent to the evaluation. It is impractical continually to re-evaluate

diffusive sampler performance under various environmental conditions prevailing during application.

NOTE 1 In this International Standard, the confidence level for the initial method evaluation becomes an integral part of

the measurement uncertainty. This approach slightly broadens the statistical protocols given in ISO Guide 98:1995.

Furthermore, the possibility of sampler errors related to correctible sampler bias is addressed.

NOTE 2 This International Standard is an extension of previous research on diffusive samplers (References [1] to [17]

inclusive and EN 838).2 Normative references

The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated

references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced

document (including any amendments) applies.EN 838, Workplace atmospheres — Diffusive samplers for the determination of gases and vapours —

Requirements and test methodsISO Guide 98:1995, Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC,

IUPAP, OIML© ISO 2007 – All rights reserved 1

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------

ISO 16107:2007(E)

3 Terms and definitions

For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in EN 838 and ISO Guide 98:1995 and the

following apply.3.1

symmetric accuracy range

fractional range about the measurand concentration, c, within which 95 % of sampler measurements are found

NOTE See References [18] to [21] inclusive.If the modulus of the bias is small, i.e. │∆│ < R/1,645, the symmetric accuracy range, A, can be shown to be closely

approximated (Reference [21]) by Equation (1):AR =×1,960 ∆+ (1)

where

∆ is the bias, expressed relative to true concentrations;

R is the overall true relative standard deviation, expressed relative to true concentrations.

OtherwiseAR =+|∆| 1,645× (2)

If the bias is corrected, the expected value of ∆ in Equation (1) becomes equal to the variance of the bias correction,

reflecting an uncorrectable residual bias due to uncertainty in the correction. Then if the bias uncertainty is under control,

the low bias modulus model of Equation (1) indicates the proportionality of A to the root mean squared combined

uncertainty components.4 Symbols and abbreviated terms

A symmetric accuracy range (3.1) in terms of bias and precision

A estimated symmetric accuracy range, A

est

A 95 % confidence level on the symmetric accuracy range, A

95 %

c true or reference analyte concentration, in milligrams per cubic metre, or parts per million as a ratio of

analyte to air molecules, per instructions of the sampler manufacturerc mean of (four) concentration estimates (including pressure and temperature corrections), in milligrams

estper cubic metre or parts per million as a ratio of analyte to air molecules, per instructions of the

sampler manufacturerh humidity, partial pressure of water vapor, in kilopascals

n number of diffusive samplers tested for measuring sampler capacity

p (atmospheric) pressure

R overall true relative standard deviation of concentration estimates (dependent on assumed

environmental variability), expressed as a percentage relative to a “true” concentration as estimated

by reference sampling2 © ISO 2007 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------

ISO 16107:2007(E)

R estimated true relative standard deviation, expressed as a percentage

est

R true relative standard deviation characterizing inter-run chamber variability, expressed as a

runpercentage

R intersampler component of the true relative standard deviation, expressed as a percentage

R estimated intersampler true relative standard deviation, R , expressed as a percentage

s est sR pulse-induced true relative standard deviation, expressed as a percentage

R 95 % confidence limit on the true relative standard deviation, expressed as a percentage

95 %s estimated standard deviation characterizing intersampler variation

t (ν) value which, at the 95 % probability level, exceeds random variables distributed according to the

0,95Student t-distribution with ν degrees of freedom

T temperature, in degrees Celsius

u ambient wind speed, in metres per second

α concentration estimate dependence on environmental variable, x (T, h, u, or c)

∆ bias relative to concentration, c

∆ estimated bias, ∆

est

∆ bias associated with concentration pulse

∆ 95 % confidence limit on the bias, ∆

95 %

ν degrees of freedom in determining R

ν effective number of degrees of freedom in determining R

eff

σ assumed concentration variability

σ assumed humidity variability

σ assumed temperature variability

σ assumed ambient wind speed variability

5 Summary of test protocol

5.1 Factors affecting performance

5.1.1 Diffusive sampling may first of all suffer from error in the sampling rate as stated by the manufacturer

of the sampler. As diffusive samplers are usually used without recalibration, this error implies a bias or

systematic error in all concentration estimates made. As the bias may be in one direction, such error cannot

be minimized by averaging several measurements. If the error is correctible it is not strictly part of the sampler

uncertainty.© ISO 2007 – All rights reserved 3

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------

ISO 16107:2007(E)

5.1.2 Aside from bias, several sources of random error exist. Some of these errors are associated with the

sampler itself. For example, the sampler’s dimensional tolerance may be low, leading to variation in the

sampling rate, sampler to sampler. The sampler may become overloaded or may not follow concentration

changes adequately.5.1.3 Other errors relate to a non-constant environment which may affect the sampling rate. Potentially

significant environmental influence quantities include temperature, humidity, wind speed, and atmospheric

pressure. To predict the effect of any such parameter, an experiment on the sampler type may be carried out.

Moreover, the variation expected of the parameter requires estimation. So as to result in a single performance

measure, typical ranges of these environmental parameters are specified in this International Standard.

5.2 “Accuracy” as providing a single performance value linking to measurementuncertainty

5.2.1 A sampler presented by a manufacturer for evaluation may be found to exhibit both imprecision and

bias. In the language of ISO Guide 98:1995, imprecision and bias together relate to the “accuracy” of a

sampler, rather than “uncertainty”. Accuracy refers to the closeness between measured values and

measurand (in this case the concentration to be measured), whereas uncertainty refers to what is known

about the measurand on the basis of the measurement. In other words, the manufacturer could recommend

use of information about the bias for correction of the measured values. This International Standard provides

means of judging a sampler as recommended for use by a manufacturer.5.2.2 A useful statistical measure exists which summarizes the overall effect of both random variation and

bias. This function has come to be known as the symmetric accuracy range, A (3.1).

5.2.3 The definition directly implies that A increases with both random error and bias magnitude. Therefore

A is one particular quantification of accuracy as defined in ISO Guide 98:1995. The greater the disparity

between measured values and measurand, the larger the value of A.NOTE A is not the only way of quantifying accuracy. For example, the selection of 95 % as coverage level is arbitrary.

Furthermore, other functions consistent with the qualitative idea of accuracy as described in ISO Guide 98:1995 are

possible.5.2.4 A indicates quantitatively how far off measurements would generally be if further correction of the

sampler were not made. A further advantage of A is that a direct link to the uncertainty described in

ISO Guide 98:1995 is obtained in the case that bias is minimized, e.g. through results of the evaluation.

5.2.5 Moreover, a measurement element not covered extensively within ISO Guide 98:1995 is dealt with

explicitly. Namely, diffusive samplers are generally used as obtained from the manufacturer without

re-evaluation at each use. Therefore, uncertainty in a measured value must account for confidence in the

[single] evaluation itself as well as variation and possible residual bias at the point of use.

5.2.6 The result of approaching uncertainty from the point of view of accuracy results in an “expanded

uncertainty” (in the language of ISO Guide 98:1995) proportional via a “coverage factor” to the root mean

squared combined uncertainty components comprised of bias uncertainty, the effects of sampler variation,

and influence quantities described above. The coverage factor is determined by the confidence required [e.g.,

95 %] in the sampler evaluation and the coverage [also 95 %]. The final result is a value of expanded

uncertainty with specific [tolerance or predictive] meaning, namely, in providing the 95 % coverage range

about the [true] measurand at 95 % confidence in the evaluation.5.3 Bias, intersampler variability and the effects of environmental uncertainty

5.3.1 This International Standard gives a procedure for assessing the effects of variability in the following

workplace variables: temperature, T; humidity, h (expressed in terms of the water vapor partial pressure to

minimize interaction with the temperature); ambient wind speed, u, across the sampler face [see (5.7)

regarding wind direction]; and concentration, c. An experiment is carried out which provides information about

the dependencies of the concentration estimates on these variables near conditions of intended sampler use

(T , h , u , and c ). Testing is required at the concentration, c , of intended use, as well as at concentrations

0 0 0 0 0reduced at least to c /2. Furthermore, the sampler bias and the intersampler standard deviation are measured.

4 © ISO 2007 – All rights reserved---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------

ISO 16107:2007(E)

Finally, the effect of diffusion of material out of the sampler is measured. Pressure effects result in correctable

bias and are not evaluated in this International Standard (5.8).5.3.2 Using four samplers for each of five experimental runs (the minimum possible), the dependencies α ,

α , α , and α (relative to the chamber reference concentration and target environmental parameters) on

h u cchanges in T, h, u, and c are measured, following the sampler manufacturer's instructions regarding pressure

and temperature corrections (if any). These experiments also give a value for the estimated sampler bias, ∆,

relative to the chamber reference concentration (defined for the target conditions). Two further runs describing

time-dependent effects (5.4.5) from diffusive loss of analyte are also carried out. The chamber reference

concentration must be traceable to primary standards of mass and volume.5.3.3 Error in the estimates of the dependencies α , α , α , and α will exist on account of the intersampler

T h u ccomponent of the true relative standard deviation R and an inter-run chamber true relative standard deviation,

R . The latter results in part from uncertainty in the reference concentration. R is obtained by pooling the

run svariance estimates from each run and therefore is estimated with 7 × 3 = 21 degrees of freedom (or

15 degrees of freedom if the reverse diffusion experiment is omitted). So as to avoid re-measurement at each

sampler/analyte evaluation, R is obtained by a separate characterization of the chamber with several runs

runat (for example) fixed environmental conditions. An example in which the dependencies α and R are

estimated is presented in Annex A.NOTE It is up to the user as to how traceability is established. In Reference [12], the concentration estimate, as

calculated from the chamber's analyte generation parameters, is regarded as the “benchmark”, although an independent

estimate is required and must be within 5 % of the calculated estimate. If these estimates differ, then a third independent

estimate is required to establish the reference concentration through agreement with one of the other independent

estimates. One possibility for such an independent estimate is the mean of at least five independent, active sampler

estimates per run within the chamber. Experiment (Reference [12]) on the accuracy of such reference measurements

using sorbent tubes indicates that a true relative standard deviation of the order of 2 % can be achieved for the individual

measurements. Alternatively, Reference [3] requires averaging of at least two independent methods (possibly including

calculated estimates) with at least four samples per method. EN 838 has adopted the looser requirement that calculated

and independent measurements shall agree within 10 %.5.3.4 A further consolidation of tests may be made by observing that the dependence of concentration

estimates on the wind speed, v, is only sampler specific, i.e. does not depend on the specific analyte.

Therefore, after a single measurement for a given sampler type, the set of tests can be narrowed to five runs

with 5 × 3 = 15 degrees of freedom in the estimate of R .5.4 Reverse diffusion

5.4.1 A potential problem with diffusive samplers is presented by the possibility of reverse diffusion

(sometimes denoted as “back-diffusion” or “off-gassing”) of the analyte. Reverse diffusion is generally only

significant in the case that an analyte is only weakly bound to the sorbent (Reference [6]). Therefore,

inaccuracy associated with these effects may usually be minimized through proper sorbent selection.

5.4.2 Because of reverse diffusion, estimates of a varying concentration may in some cases be biased. The

worst-case situation occurs with the concentration in the form of an isolated pulse at either the beginning or

end of the sampling period. A pulse at the beginning of the period allows the entire sampling period (4 h

to 12 h) for sample loss, possibly resulting in a low estimate relative to a pulse at the end.

5.4.3 In some cases, the time dependence of a specific workplace concentration correlates strongly with the

sampling period. For example, a cleanup operation at the end of a workday could introduce analyte only then.

This could imply a positive bias in the concentration estimates obtained from a day's sampling. For simplicity,

however, this International Standard is designed to assess performance of samplers for use in a concentration

fluctuating in a stationary manner, so that time-dependent effects are treated simply as components of

sampler variance. Specifically, the effect of an isolated 0,5 h pulse occurring at random within the sampling

period is estimated.5.4.4 Challenging samplers to 0,5 h pulses is similar to the tests of NIOSH (Reference [3]) and EN 838.

© ISO 2007 – All rights reserved 5---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------

ISO 16107:2007(E)

5.4.5 Let ∆ (>0) represent one-half the bias between estimates from a 0,5 h pulse at the end versus the

beginning of the sampling period, relative to the mean of the estimates. Assume, conservatively (see, for

example, Reference [6]), that the bias in the estimates of 0,5 h pulse occurring at random within (for example,

an 8 h sampling period ranges uniformly between −∆ and +∆. Then the variance, R , associated with

t tsampling a 0,5 h pulse at random within the sampling period is given by Equation (3):

R = ∆ (3)5.5 Capacity — Control of effects from interfering compounds

5.5.1 This International Standard provides a test for confirming a manufacturer's claimed sampler capacity

under stated conditions of use. Such conditions would normally refer to a specific sampling period and to

environmental extremes, such as 80 % relative humidity at a temperature of 30 °C. Additionally, a

manufacturer may claim a value of capacity for sampling in the presence of specific interferences at stated

concentrations.5.5.2 For the purposes of this International Standard, capacity is defined as the sampled mass (or

equivalently as the concentration for a specific sampling period) at which concentration estimates are 10 %

low. Specifically, capacity is considered not exceeded if concentration estimates, corrected for correctable

bias, are above 90 % of the true concentration at the 95 % confidence level.5.5.3 An example of the test is as follows: eight diffusive and eight active samplers are exposed to the

analyte of interest under the stated environmental conditions. Then, neglecting variability in the reference

sampler mean, the 95 % confidence limit ∆µ on the difference in the (unknown) mean concentration

95 %estimates is given by Equation (4):

∆µ =−∆cs[×t(ν)/ n] (4)

95% 0,95

where

∆c is the estimated mean difference between diffusive and active results;

s is the estimated standard deviation characterizing intersampler variation, calculated from the eight

diffusive sampler estimates;n is the number of samplers of each type (in this case, 8);

ν is the number of degrees of freedom (n − 1 = 7).

Then ∆µ shall be greater than −10 % c, where c is the mean concentration estimate from the reference

95 %samplers.

EXAMPLE Suppose the diffusive sampler component of the true relative standard deviation, R = 5 %:

(/sc)×=t (ν)/ n 3.3 (5)0,95

Therefore, in this case the mean value of the diffusive results shall be greater than 93,3 % of the reference concentration.

NOTE As capacity strongly correlates with sampled mass, a capacity limit expressed as sampled mass at one stated

sampling period is generally applicable to a range of sampling periods.5.6 Capacity overload detection

The capability to detect capacity overload (e.g. by the use of a second sorbent or by employing paired

samplers with different sampli**...**

SLOVENSKI STANDARD

SIST ISO 16107:2012

01-april-2012

1DGRPHãþD

SIST ISO 16107:2002

=UDNQDGHORYQHPPHVWX3URWRNRO]DYUHGQRWHQMHODVWQRVWLGLIX]LMVNLK

Y]RUþHYDOQLNRY

Workplace atmospheres - Protocol for evaluating the performance of diffusive samplers

Air des lieux de travail - Protocole pour l'évaluation de la performance des dispositifs de

prélèvement par diffusionTa slovenski standard je istoveten z: ISO 16107:2007

ICS:

13.040.30 Kakovost zraka na delovnem Workplace atmospheres

mestu

SIST ISO 16107:2012 en

2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------SIST ISO 16107:2012

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

INTERNATIONAL ISO

STANDARD 16107

Second edition

2007-10-15

Workplace atmospheres — Protocol for

evaluating the performance of diffusive

samplers

Air des lieux de travail — Protocole pour l'évaluation de la performance

des dispositifs de prélèvement par diffusion

Reference number

ISO 16107:2007(E)

ISO 2007

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

ISO 16107:2007(E)

PDF disclaimer

This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobe's licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but

shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In

downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobe's licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat

accepts no liability in this area.Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.

Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation

parameters were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In

the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below.

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT© ISO 2007

All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means,

electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or

ISO's member body in the country of the requester.ISO copyright office

Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20

Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11

Fax + 41 22 749 09 47

E-mail copyright@iso.org

Web www.iso.org

Published in Switzerland

ii © ISO 2007 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

ISO 16107:2007(E)

Contents Page

Foreword............................................................................................................................................................ iv

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ v

1 Scope ..................................................................................................................................................... 1

2 Normative references ........................................................................................................................... 1

3 Terms and definitions........................................................................................................................... 2

4 Symbols and abbreviated terms ......................................................................................................... 2

5 Summary of test protocol .................................................................................................................... 3

5.1 Factors affecting performance ............................................................................................................ 3

5.2 “Accuracy” as providing a single performance value linking to measurement uncertainty........ 4

5.3 Bias, intersampler variability and the effects of environmental uncertainty.................................. 4

5.4 Reverse diffusion.................................................................................................................................. 5

5.5 Capacity — Control of effects from interfering compounds............................................................ 6

5.6 Capacity overload detection................................................................................................................ 6

5.7 Desorption efficiency ........................................................................................................................... 7

5.8 Atmospheric pressure.......................................................................................................................... 7

5.9 Wind direction ....................................................................................................................................... 7

5.10 Simplifications ...................................................................................................................................... 7

6 Apparatus .............................................................................................................................................. 7

6.1 Exposure chamber specifications ...................................................................................................... 7

6.2 Controlled environmental conditions................................................................................................. 8

6.3 Inter-run variability ............................................................................................................................... 8

7 Reagents and materials ....................................................................................................................... 9

8 Procedure .............................................................................................................................................. 9

9 Sampler performance classification................................................................................................... 9

10 Accuracy.............................................................................................................................................. 10

10.1 General................................................................................................................................................. 10

10.2 Accuracy range confidence limit ...................................................................................................... 10

10.3 Expanded uncertainty ........................................................................................................................ 11

11 Test report ........................................................................................................................................... 11

Annex A (informative) Worked example — Program for diffusive sampler accuracy range

calculation ........................................................................................................................................... 13

Annex B (informative) Calculation of variances............................................................................................ 15

Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................................... 16

© ISO 2007 – All rights reserved iii---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

ISO 16107:2007(E)

Foreword

ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies

(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO

technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been

established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and

non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the

International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.

International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.

The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards

adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an

International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.

Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent

rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.

ISO 16107 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 146, Air quality, Subcommittee SC 2, Workplace

atmospheres.This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 16107:1999), which has been technically

revised.iv © ISO 2007 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

ISO 16107:2007(E)

Introduction

Gas or vapor sampling is often accomplished by actively pumping air through a collection medium such as

activated charcoal. Problems associated with a pump, such as inconvenience, inaccuracy and expense, are

inextricable from this type of sampling. The alternative covered by this International Standard is to use

diffusion for moving the compound of interest onto the collection medium. This approach to sampling is

attractive because of the convenience of use and low total monitoring cost.However, previous studies have found significant problems with the accuracy of some samplers. Therefore,

although diffusive samplers may provide a plethora of data, inaccuracies and misuse of diffusive samplers

may yet affect research studies. Furthermore, worker protection may be based on faulty assumptions. The

aim of this International Standard is to counter the uncertainties in diffusive sampling through achieving a

broadly accepted set of performance tests and acceptance criteria for proving the efficacy of any given

diffusive sampler intended for use.This International Standard is intended specifically for the large-scale evaluation of many diffusive

sampler/analyte pairs of practical application and is complementary to EN 838. An affordable, experimental

evaluation determines a single performance value indicating how a sampler performs in a typical situation. A

sampler can thereby be quickly judged as to acceptability. Additionally, sufficient data are obtained to predict

performance in many atypical situations. For example, although sampling may normally be done at room

temperature, a particular need may call for use in extreme cold. In such a case, the single performance value

would be superseded by the particular needs.© ISO 2007 – All rights reserved v

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 16107:2007(E)

Workplace atmospheres — Protocol for evaluating the

performance of diffusive samplers

1 Scope

This International Standard specifies methods for evaluation of sampler performance in terms of workplace

conditions: wind speed, humidity, temperature, atmospheric pressure, and analyte variation. The concise set

of experiments specified aims to minimize cost to the user. The evaluation is limited to conditions commonly

encountered in personal sampling in the indoor workplace setting, namely wind speeds of up to 0,5 m/s and

for sampling periods typically from 2 h to 8 h.Static or area sampling, unlike personal sampling where movement of the subject is significant, may

sometimes be subject to sampling-rate reduction due to stagnation at very low wind speeds. This International

Standard therefore does not apply to wind speeds of less than 0,1 m/s relative to static samplers. Samplers

are also tested for compliance with the manufacturer's stated limits on capacity, possibly in the presence of

interfering compounds. Given a suitable exposure chamber, the sampler evaluation protocol can be extended

to cover sampler use for other sampling periods and conditions.This International Standard indicates how to measure diffusive sampler uncertainty for characterizing

concentration estimates obtained subsequent to the evaluation. It is impractical continually to re-evaluate

diffusive sampler performance under various environmental conditions prevailing during application.

NOTE 1 In this International Standard, the confidence level for the initial method evaluation becomes an integral part of

the measurement uncertainty. This approach slightly broadens the statistical protocols given in ISO Guide 98:1995.

Furthermore, the possibility of sampler errors related to correctible sampler bias is addressed.

NOTE 2 This International Standard is an extension of previous research on diffusive samplers (References [1] to [17]

inclusive and EN 838).2 Normative references

The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated

references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced

document (including any amendments) applies.EN 838, Workplace atmospheres — Diffusive samplers for the determination of gases and vapours —

Requirements and test methodsISO Guide 98:1995, Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC,

IUPAP, OIML© ISO 2007 – All rights reserved 1

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

ISO 16107:2007(E)

3 Terms and definitions

For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in EN 838 and ISO Guide 98:1995 and the

following apply.3.1

symmetric accuracy range

fractional range about the measurand concentration, c, within which 95 % of sampler measurements are found

NOTE See References [18] to [21] inclusive.If the modulus of the bias is small, i.e. │∆│ < R/1,645, the symmetric accuracy range, A, can be shown to be closely

approximated (Reference [21]) by Equation (1):AR =×1,960 ∆+ (1)

where

∆ is the bias, expressed relative to true concentrations;

R is the overall true relative standard deviation, expressed relative to true concentrations.

OtherwiseAR =+|∆| 1,645× (2)

If the bias is corrected, the expected value of ∆ in Equation (1) becomes equal to the variance of the bias correction,

reflecting an uncorrectable residual bias due to uncertainty in the correction. Then if the bias uncertainty is under control,

the low bias modulus model of Equation (1) indicates the proportionality of A to the root mean squared combined

uncertainty components.4 Symbols and abbreviated terms

A symmetric accuracy range (3.1) in terms of bias and precision

A estimated symmetric accuracy range, A

est

A 95 % confidence level on the symmetric accuracy range, A

95 %

c true or reference analyte concentration, in milligrams per cubic metre, or parts per million as a ratio of

analyte to air molecules, per instructions of the sampler manufacturerc mean of (four) concentration estimates (including pressure and temperature corrections), in milligrams

estper cubic metre or parts per million as a ratio of analyte to air molecules, per instructions of the

sampler manufacturerh humidity, partial pressure of water vapor, in kilopascals

n number of diffusive samplers tested for measuring sampler capacity

p (atmospheric) pressure

R overall true relative standard deviation of concentration estimates (dependent on assumed

environmental variability), expressed as a percentage relative to a “true” concentration as estimated

by reference sampling2 © ISO 2007 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

ISO 16107:2007(E)

R estimated true relative standard deviation, expressed as a percentage

est

R true relative standard deviation characterizing inter-run chamber variability, expressed as a

runpercentage

R intersampler component of the true relative standard deviation, expressed as a percentage

R estimated intersampler true relative standard deviation, R , expressed as a percentage

s est sR pulse-induced true relative standard deviation, expressed as a percentage

R 95 % confidence limit on the true relative standard deviation, expressed as a percentage

95 %s estimated standard deviation characterizing intersampler variation

t (ν) value which, at the 95 % probability level, exceeds random variables distributed according to the

0,95Student t-distribution with ν degrees of freedom

T temperature, in degrees Celsius

u ambient wind speed, in metres per second

α concentration estimate dependence on environmental variable, x (T, h, u, or c)

∆ bias relative to concentration, c

∆ estimated bias, ∆

est

∆ bias associated with concentration pulse

∆ 95 % confidence limit on the bias, ∆

95 %

ν degrees of freedom in determining R

ν effective number of degrees of freedom in determining R

eff

σ assumed concentration variability

σ assumed humidity variability

σ assumed temperature variability

σ assumed ambient wind speed variability

5 Summary of test protocol

5.1 Factors affecting performance

5.1.1 Diffusive sampling may first of all suffer from error in the sampling rate as stated by the manufacturer

of the sampler. As diffusive samplers are usually used without recalibration, this error implies a bias or

systematic error in all concentration estimates made. As the bias may be in one direction, such error cannot

be minimized by averaging several measurements. If the error is correctible it is not strictly part of the sampler

uncertainty.© ISO 2007 – All rights reserved 3

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

ISO 16107:2007(E)

5.1.2 Aside from bias, several sources of random error exist. Some of these errors are associated with the

sampler itself. For example, the sampler’s dimensional tolerance may be low, leading to variation in the

sampling rate, sampler to sampler. The sampler may become overloaded or may not follow concentration

changes adequately.5.1.3 Other errors relate to a non-constant environment which may affect the sampling rate. Potentially

significant environmental influence quantities include temperature, humidity, wind speed, and atmospheric

pressure. To predict the effect of any such parameter, an experiment on the sampler type may be carried out.

Moreover, the variation expected of the parameter requires estimation. So as to result in a single performance

measure, typical ranges of these environmental parameters are specified in this International Standard.

5.2 “Accuracy” as providing a single performance value linking to measurementuncertainty

5.2.1 A sampler presented by a manufacturer for evaluation may be found to exhibit both imprecision and

bias. In the language of ISO Guide 98:1995, imprecision and bias together relate to the “accuracy” of a

sampler, rather than “uncertainty”. Accuracy refers to the closeness between measured values and

measurand (in this case the concentration to be measured), whereas uncertainty refers to what is known

about the measurand on the basis of the measurement. In other words, the manufacturer could recommend

use of information about the bias for correction of the measured values. This International Standard provides

means of judging a sampler as recommended for use by a manufacturer.5.2.2 A useful statistical measure exists which summarizes the overall effect of both random variation and

bias. This function has come to be known as the symmetric accuracy range, A (3.1).

5.2.3 The definition directly implies that A increases with both random error and bias magnitude. Therefore

A is one particular quantification of accuracy as defined in ISO Guide 98:1995. The greater the disparity

between measured values and measurand, the larger the value of A.NOTE A is not the only way of quantifying accuracy. For example, the selection of 95 % as coverage level is arbitrary.

Furthermore, other functions consistent with the qualitative idea of accuracy as described in ISO Guide 98:1995 are

possible.5.2.4 A indicates quantitatively how far off measurements would generally be if further correction of the

sampler were not made. A further advantage of A is that a direct link to the uncertainty described in

ISO Guide 98:1995 is obtained in the case that bias is minimized, e.g. through results of the evaluation.

5.2.5 Moreover, a measurement element not covered extensively within ISO Guide 98:1995 is dealt with

explicitly. Namely, diffusive samplers are generally used as obtained from the manufacturer without

re-evaluation at each use. Therefore, uncertainty in a measured value must account for confidence in the

[single] evaluation itself as well as variation and possible residual bias at the point of use.

5.2.6 The result of approaching uncertainty from the point of view of accuracy results in an “expanded

uncertainty” (in the language of ISO Guide 98:1995) proportional via a “coverage factor” to the root mean

squared combined uncertainty components comprised of bias uncertainty, the effects of sampler variation,

and influence quantities described above. The coverage factor is determined by the confidence required [e.g.,

95 %] in the sampler evaluation and the coverage [also 95 %]. The final result is a value of expanded

uncertainty with specific [tolerance or predictive] meaning, namely, in providing the 95 % coverage range

about the [true] measurand at 95 % confidence in the evaluation.5.3 Bias, intersampler variability and the effects of environmental uncertainty

5.3.1 This International Standard gives a procedure for assessing the effects of variability in the following

workplace variables: temperature, T; humidity, h (expressed in terms of the water vapor partial pressure to

minimize interaction with the temperature); ambient wind speed, u, across the sampler face [see (5.7)

regarding wind direction]; and concentration, c. An experiment is carried out which provides information about

the dependencies of the concentration estimates on these variables near conditions of intended sampler use

(T , h , u , and c ). Testing is required at the concentration, c , of intended use, as well as at concentrations

0 0 0 0 0reduced at least to c /2. Furthermore, the sampler bias and the intersampler standard deviation are measured.

4 © ISO 2007 – All rights reserved---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

ISO 16107:2007(E)

Finally, the effect of diffusion of material out of the sampler is measured. Pressure effects result in correctable

bias and are not evaluated in this International Standard (5.8).5.3.2 Using four samplers for each of five experimental runs (the minimum possible), the dependencies α ,

α , α , and α (relative to the chamber reference concentration and target environmental parameters) on

h u cchanges in T, h, u, and c are measured, following the sampler manufacturer's instructions regarding pressure

and temperature corrections (if any). These experiments also give a value for the estimated sampler bias, ∆,

relative to the chamber reference concentration (defined for the target conditions). Two further runs describing

time-dependent effects (5.4.5) from diffusive loss of analyte are also carried out. The chamber reference

concentration must be traceable to primary standards of mass and volume.5.3.3 Error in the estimates of the dependencies α , α , α , and α will exist on account of the intersampler

T h u ccomponent of the true relative standard deviation R and an inter-run chamber true relative standard deviation,

R . The latter results in part from uncertainty in the reference concentration. R is obtained by pooling the

run svariance estimates from each run and therefore is estimated with 7 × 3 = 21 degrees of freedom (or

15 degrees of freedom if the reverse diffusion experiment is omitted). So as to avoid re-measurement at each

sampler/analyte evaluation, R is obtained by a separate characterization of the chamber with several runs

runat (for example) fixed environmental conditions. An example in which the dependencies α and R are

estimated is presented in Annex A.NOTE It is up to the user as to how traceability is established. In Reference [12], the concentration estimate, as

calculated from the chamber's analyte generation parameters, is regarded as the “benchmark”, although an independent

estimate is required and must be within 5 % of the calculated estimate. If these estimates differ, then a third independent

estimate is required to establish the reference concentration through agreement with one of the other independent

estimates. One possibility for such an independent estimate is the mean of at least five independent, active sampler

estimates per run within the chamber. Experiment (Reference [12]) on the accuracy of such reference measurements

using sorbent tubes indicates that a true relative standard deviation of the order of 2 % can be achieved for the individual

measurements. Alternatively, Reference [3] requires averaging of at least two independent methods (possibly including

calculated estimates) with at least four samples per method. EN 838 has adopted the looser requirement that calculated

and independent measurements shall agree within 10 %.5.3.4 A further consolidation of tests may be made by observing that the dependence of concentration

estimates on the wind speed, v, is only sampler specific, i.e. does not depend on the specific analyte.

Therefore, after a single measurement for a given sampler type, the set of tests can be narrowed to five runs

with 5 × 3 = 15 degrees of freedom in the estimate of R .5.4 Reverse diffusion

5.4.1 A potential problem with diffusive samplers is presented by the possibility of reverse diffusion

(sometimes denoted as “back-diffusion” or “off-gassing”) of the analyte. Reverse diffusion is generally only

significant in the case that an analyte is only weakly bound to the sorbent (Reference [6]). Therefore,

inaccuracy associated with these effects may usually be minimized through proper sorbent selection.

5.4.2 Because of reverse diffusion, estimates of a varying concentration may in some cases be biased. The

worst-case situation occurs with the concentration in the form of an isolated pulse at either the beginning or

end of the sampling period. A pulse at the beginning of the period allows the entire sampling period (4 h

to 12 h) for sample loss, possibly resulting in a low estimate relative to a pulse at the end.

5.4.3 In some cases, the time dependence of a specific workplace concentration correlates strongly with the

sampling period. For example, a cleanup operation at the end of a workday could introduce analyte only then.

This could imply a positive bias in the concentration estimates obtained from a day's sampling. For simplicity,

however, this International Standard is designed to assess performance of samplers for use in a concentration

fluctuating in a stationary manner, so that time-dependent effects are treated simply as components of

sampler variance. Specifically, the effect of an isolated 0,5 h pulse occurring at random within the sampling

period is estimated.5.4.4 Challenging samplers to 0,5 h pulses is similar to the tests of NIOSH (Reference [3]) and EN 838.

© ISO 2007 – All rights reserved 5---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------

SIST ISO 16107:2012

ISO 16107:2007(E)

5.4.5 Let ∆ (>0) represent one-half the bias between estimates from a 0,5 h pulse at the end versus the

beginning of the sampling period, relative to the mean of the estimates. Assume, conservatively (see, for

example, Reference [6]), that the bias in the estimates of 0,5 h pulse occurring at random within (for example,

an 8 h sampling period ranges uniformly between −∆ and +∆. Then the variance, R , associated with

t tsampling a 0,5 h pulse at random within the sampling period is given by Equation (3):

R = ∆ (3)5.5 Capacity — Control of effects from interfering compounds

5.5.1 This International Standard provides a test for confirming a manufacturer's claimed sampler capacity

under stated conditions of use. Such conditions would normally refer to a specific sampling period and to

environmental extremes, such as 80 % relative humidity at a temperature of 30 °C. Additionally, a

manufacturer may claim a value of capacity for sampling in the presence of specific interferences at stated

concentrations.5.5.2 For the purposes of this International Standard, capacity is defined as the sampled mass (or

equivalently as the concentration for a specific sampling period) at which concentration estimates are 10 %

low. Specifically, capacity is considered not exceeded if concentration estimates, corrected for correctable

bias, are above 90 % of the true concentration at the 95 % confidence level.5.5.3 An example of the test is as follows: eight diffusive and eight active samplers are exposed to the

analyte of interest under the stated environmental conditions. Then, neglecting variability in the reference

sampler mean, the 95 % confidence limit ∆µ on the difference in the (unknown) mean concentration

95 %estimates is given by Equation (4)

**...**

## Questions, Comments and Discussion

## Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.