Standard Practice for Assessment of Vapor Intrusion into Structures on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Uses—This practice is intended for use on a voluntary basis by parties who wish to conduct a VIA on a parcel of real estate, or more specifically conduct a screening evaluation to determine whether or not there is potential for a VIC, and if so, identify alternatives for further investigation. To determine whether the vapor intrusion exposure pathway is complete and, if so, whether it poses or may pose an unacceptable risk to human health (that is, whether a VIC exists), this practice directs the user and environmental professional to existing federal or state vapor intrusion policy, regulation and guidance (refer to Appendix X5 and Appendix X9). The process defined in this practice begins with a reasonably conservative screening process that requires information generally collected as part of a Practice E 1527 Phase I ESA. If a pVIC is identified in this initial screening, the process gradually progresses toward a more complex assessment involving increasingly greater use of site-specific data. For those sites unable to be screened out, the process provides alternative methods to determine whether a VIC exists. If a VIC is found to exist, the process describes general mitigation alternatives. This practice is intended primarily as an approach to conducting an inquiry designed to identify pVICs or VICs in connection with a property involved in a real estate transaction. This practice is intended to reflect a commercially practical and reasonable inquiry (see 1.2). The practice can be applied to property with existing structures, property with structures that will be substantially rehabilitated, property without existing structures but having planned structures (for example, property in development), or property without existing structures and with no planned structures (for example, undeveloped property with no planned development).
Clarifications on Use:
Use in Conjunction with Practice E 1527 Phase I ESA—This practice, when added as a supplemental scope of ...
SCOPE
1.1 Purpose—The purpose of this practice is to define good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting a vapor intrusion assessment (VIA) on a property parcel involved in a real estate transaction with respect to chemicals of concern (COC) that may migrate as vapors into existing or planned structures on a property due to contaminated soil and groundwater on the property or within close proximity to the property. This practice may be used as a voluntary supplement to Practice E 1527 and does not alter or in any way define the scope of that practice. In addition, performance of this standard is not a requirement of and does not constitute, expand, or in any way define “all appropriate inquiry” as defined or approved by U.S. EPA under CERCLA and the regulations thereunder, including 40 CFR Sec. 312.11.
1.1.1 Vapor Intrusion Condition (VIC)—In defining a standard of good commercial and customary practice for conducting a VIA on a parcel of property, the goal of the process established by this practice is to identify whether or not a vapor intrusion condition (VIC) exists or is likely to exist on the property. The term VIC means the presence or likely presence of any COC in the indoor air environment of existing or planned structures on a property caused by the release of vapor from contaminated soil or groundwater either on the property or within close proximity to the property, at a concentration that presents or may present an unacceptable health risk to occupants. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that do not normally represent an unacceptable health risk to occupants and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. A condition determined to be de minimis does not represent a VIC.  
1.1.2 Other Federal, State, and Local Environmental Laws—This practice does not address requ...

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
29-Feb-2008
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM E2600-08 - Standard Practice for Assessment of Vapor Intrusion into Structures on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions
English language
56 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information.
Designation:E2600–08
Standard Practice for
Assessment of Vapor Intrusion into Structures on Property
1
Involved in Real Estate Transactions
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2600; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope federal, state, or local laws with respect to vapor intrusion.
Users are cautioned that federal, state, and local laws, regula-
1.1 Purpose—The purpose of this practice is to define good
tions or policy may impose VIA obligations that are beyond the
commercial and customary practice in the United States of
2 scopeofthispractice(refertoAppendixX5andAppendixX9).
America for conducting a vapor intrusion assessment (VIA)
Users should also be aware that there are likely to be other
on a property parcel involved in a real estate transaction with
legal obligations, for example, disclosure, with regard to COC
respect to chemicals of concern (COC) that may migrate as
discovered on the property that are not addressed in this
vapors into existing or planned structures on a property due to
practice and that may pose risks of civil or criminal liability, or
contaminated soil and groundwater on the property or within
both.
close proximity to the property. This practice may be used as a
1.1.3 Documentation—The scope of this practice includes
voluntary supplement to Practice E1527 and does not alter or
investigation and reporting requirements. Sufficient documen-
in any way define the scope of that practice. In addition,
tation of all sources, records, and resources used in the inquiry
performance of this standard is not a requirement of and does
required by this practice shall be provided in the report (refer
not constitute, expand, or in any way define “all appropriate
to Section 12).
inquiry” as defined or approved by U.S. EPA under CERCLA
1.2 Objectives—Objectives guiding the development of this
and the regulations thereunder, including 40 CFR Sec. 312.11.
practice are: (1) to synthesize and put into writing good
1.1.1 Vapor Intrusion Condition (VIC)—In defining a stan-
commercial and customary practice for conducting a VIA on a
dard of good commercial and customary practice for conduct-
property involved in a real estate transaction, (2) to supple-
ing a VIA on a parcel of property, the goal of the process
menta Phase I environmental site assessment (ESA)conducted
establishedbythispracticeistoidentifywhetherornota vapor
in accordance with Practice E1527, (3) to ensure that the
intrusion condition (VIC) exists or is likely to exist on the
process for assessing vapor intrusion is practical and reason-
property. The term VIC means the presence or likely presence
able, and (4) to provide an industry standard for a VIA on a
of any COC in the indoor air environment of existing or
property involved in a real estate transaction.
planned structures on a property caused by the release of vapor
1.3 Considerations Beyond Scope—The use of this practice
from contaminated soil or groundwater either on the property
is strictly limited to the scope set forth in this section. Section
orwithin close proximitytotheproperty,ataconcentrationthat
13 of this practice identifies, for informational purposes,
presents or may present an unacceptable health risk to occu-
certain tasks (not an all-inclusive list) which may be conducted
pants. The term is not intended to include de minimis condi-
on a property that are beyond the scope of this practice but
tionsthatdonotnormallyrepresentanunacceptablehealthrisk
which may warrant consideration by parties to a real estate
to occupants and that generally would not be the subject of an
transaction. The need to include an investigation of any such
enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate
conditions in the environmental professional’s scope of ser-
governmental agencies. A condition determined to be de
vices should be evaluated based upon, among other factors, the
minimis does not represent a VIC.
nature of the property and the reasons for performing the site
1.1.2 Other Federal, State, and Local Environmental
assessment (for example, a more comprehensive evaluation of
Laws—This practice does not address requirements of any
business environmental risk) and should be agreed upon
between the user and environmental professional as additional
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E50 on Environ-
services beyond the scope of this practice prior to initiation of
mental Assessment, Risk Management and Corrective Action and is the direct
the Phase I ESA or initiation of an independent VIA.
responsibility of Subcomm
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.