Standard Practice for Computing the Colors of Objects by Using the CIE System

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
The CIE colorimetric systems provide numerical specifications that are meant to indicate whether or not pairs of color stimuli match when viewed by a CIE standard observer. The CIE color systems are not intended to provide visually uniform scales of color difference or to describe visually perceived color appearances.
This practice provides for the calculation of tristimulus values X, Y, Z and chromaticity coordinates x, y that can be used directly for psychophysical color stimulus specification or that can be transformed to nearly visually uniform color scales, such as CIELAB and CIELUV. Uniform color scales are preferred for research, production control, color-difference calculation, color specification, and setting color tolerances. The appearance of a material or an object is not completely specified by the numerical evaluation of its psychophysical color, because appearance can be influenced by other properties such as gloss or texture.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice provides the values and practical computation procedures needed to obtain CIE tristimulus values from spectral reflectance, transmittance, or radiance data for object-color specimens.
1.2 Procedures and tables of standard values are given for computing from spectral measurements the CIE tristimulus values X, Y, Z, and chromaticity coordinates x, yfor the CIE 1931 standard observer and X 10, Y10, Z 10 and x10.  y10 for the CIE 1964 supplementary standard observer.
1.3 Standard values are included for the spectral power of six CIE standard illuminants and three CIE recommended fluorescent illuminants.
1.4 Procedures are included for cases in which data are available only in more limited wavelength ranges than those recommended, or for a measurement interval wider than that recommended by the CIE. This practice is applicable to spectral data obtained in accordance with Practice E 1164 with 1-, 5-, 10-, or 20-nm measurement interval.
1.5 Procedures are included for cases in which the spectral data are, and those in which they are not, corrected for bandpass dependence. For the uncorrected cases, it is assumed that the spectral bandpass of the instrument used to obtain the data was approximately equal to the measurement interval and was triangular in shape. These choices are believed to correspond to the most widely used industrial practice.
1.6 This practice includes procedures for conversion of results to color spaces that are part of the CIE system, such as CIELAB and CIELUV (3). Equations for calculating color differences in these and other systems are given in Practice D 2244.
1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Nov-2006
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM E308-06 - Standard Practice for Computing the Colors of Objects by Using the CIE System
English language
34 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: E 308 – 06
Standard Practice for
1
Computing the Colors of Objects by Using the CIE System
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 308; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
INTRODUCTION
Standard tables (Tables 1-4) of color matching functions and illuminant spectral power distributions
have since 1931 been defined by the CIE, but the CIE has eschewed the role of preparing tables of
tristimulus weighting factors for the convenient calculation of tristimulus values. There have
subsequently appeared numerous compilations of tristimulus weighting factors in the literature with
disparity of data resulting from, for example, different selections of wavelength intervals and methods
2
of truncating abbreviated wavelength ranges. In 1970, Foster et al. (1) proposed conventions to
standardize these two features, and Stearns (2) published a more complete set of tables. Stearns’ work
and later publications such as the 1985 revision of E 308 have greatly reduced the substantial
variations in methods for tristimulus computation that existed several decades ago.
The disparities among earlier tables were largely caused by the introduction of computations based
on 20-nm wavelength intervals. With the increasing precision of modern instruments, there is a
likelihood of a need for tables for narrower wavelength intervals. Stearns’ tables, based on a 10-nm
interval, did not allow the derivation of consistent tables with wavelength intervals less than 10 nm.
The 1-nm table must be designated the basic table if others with greater wavelength intervals are to
have the same white point, and this was the reason for the 1985 revision of E 308, resulting in tables
that are included in the present revision as Tables 5.
The 1994 revision was made in order to introduce to the user a method of reducing the dependence
of the computed tristimulus values on the bandpass of the measuring instrument, using methods that
are detailed in this practice. These changes, however, lead to tables (Tables 6 in this practice) that are
substantially different from the Tables 5 that have been in use since 1985. There is accordingly a
danger, if the new tables are introduced but not universally adopted, that there may again be, perhaps
forseveraldecades,asignificantdisparityamongthetablesoftristimulusweightingfactorscommonly
used. It is highly desirable that this should be avoided.
1. Scope 1931 standard observer and X ,Y ,Z and x .y for the
10 10 10 10 10
CIE 1964 supplementary standard observer.
1.1 This practice provides the values and practical compu-
1.3 Standard values are included for the spectral power of
tation procedures needed to obtain CIE tristimulus values from
six CIE standard illuminants and three CIE recommended
spectral reflectance, transmittance, or radiance data for object-
fluorescent illuminants.
color specimens.
1.4 Procedures are included for cases in which data are
1.2 Procedures and tables of standard values are given for
available only in more limited wavelength ranges than those
computing from spectral measurements the CIE tristimulus
recommended, or for a measurement interval wider than that
values X, Y, Z, and chromaticity coordinates x, y for the CIE
recommended by the CIE. This practice is applicable to
spectral data obtained in accordance with Practice E 1164 with
1-, 5-, 10-, or 20-nm measurement interval.
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E12 on Color and
1.5 Procedures are included for cases in which the spectral
Appearance and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E12.04 on Color and
Appearance Analysis.
data are, and those in which they are not, corrected for
Current edition approved Dec. 1, 2006. Published January 2007. Originally
bandpass dependence. For the uncorrected cases, it is assumed
approved in 1966. Last previous edition approved in 2001 as E 308 – 01.
2 that the spectral bandpass of the instrument used to obtain the
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end of
this practice. data was approximately equal to the measurement interval and
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
E308–06
was triangular in shape. These choices are believed to corre- 3.2.3.1 Discussion—In the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric
spond to the most widely used industrial practice. system, the chromaticity coordina
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.