CEN/TS 17342:2019
(Main)Road restraint systems - Motorcycle road restraint systems which reduce the impact severity of motorcyclist collisions with safety barriers
Road restraint systems - Motorcycle road restraint systems which reduce the impact severity of motorcyclist collisions with safety barriers
This document specifies requirements for the impact performance of systems designed for the reduction of impact severity for PTW riders impacting safety barriers whilst sliding along the ground, having fallen from their PTW vehicle. The protection systems concerned are those fitted to barriers or barriers that have an inherent PTW rider protection or risk reduction capability. This document excludes the assessment of the vehicle restraint capabilities of barriers and the risk that they represent to the occupants of impacting cars. The assessment of barrier performance with respect to impacting vehicles is covered by EN 1317-1 and EN 1317-2.
This document defines performance classes taking into account rider speed classes, impact severity and the working width of the system with respect to rider impacts.
For systems designed to be added to a standard barrier, the test results are valid only when the system is fitted to the model of barrier used in the tests since the performance will not necessarily be the same if the system is fitted to a different barrier.
Rückhaltesysteme an Straßen - Rückhaltesysteme für Motorräder, die die Anprallheftigkeit an Schutzplanken für Motorradfahrer reduzieren
Dieses Dokument legt Anforderungen an die Leistungsfähigkeit von Systemen fest, die die Anprallheftigkeit für von ihrem PTW gestürzte, auf dem Boden rutschende Motorradfahrer beim Anprall an eine Schutzeinrichtung reduzieren sollen. Diese Schutzsysteme sind an Schutzeinrichtungen mit oder ohne inhärenten PTW-Fahrerschutz oder Vorrichtungen zur Risikominderung angebracht. Dieses Dokument befasst sich nicht mit der Bewertung der Aufhaltefähigkeit von Schutzeinrichtungen gegenüber Fahrzeugen und der Insassengefährdung für anprallende Pkws. Die Leistungsbewertung von Schutzeinrichtungen in Bezug auf den Anprall von Fahrzeugen ist von EN 1317 1 und EN 1317 2 abgedeckt.
Dieses Dokument legt Leistungsklassen im Hinblick auf einen Fahreranprall fest, wobei Fahrergeschwindig¬keitsklassen, Anprallheftigkeit und der Wirkungsbereich des Systems berücksichtigt werden.
Für Systeme, die zum Nachrüsten von Norm-Schutzeinrichtungen ausgelegt wurden, sind die Prüfergebnisse nur dann gültig, wenn das System an dem gleichen Schutzeinrichtungen-Modell wie in der Prüfung installiert wird, da die Leistungsfähigkeit bei der Installation an einer anderen Schutzeinrichtung nicht notwendiger¬weise gleich bleibt.
Dispositifs de retenue routiers — Dispositifs de retenue routiers pour motos réduisant la sévérité de choc en cas de collision de motocyclistes avec les barrières de sécurité
Le présent document spécifie des exigences pour la performance en cas d’impact des dispositifs conçus pour réduire la sévérité du choc subi par les conducteurs de DRM lorsqu’ils percutent une barrière de sécurité de sécurité en glissant sur le sol après avoir chuté de leur véhicule. Les dispositifs de protection concernés sont ceux qui sont fixés aux barrières de sécurité ou les barrières de sécurité intégrant une protection des conducteurs de DRM ou des capacités de réduction des risques. Le présent document exclut l’évaluation des capacités des barrières de sécurité en matière de retenue des véhicules ainsi que le risque qu’elles représentent pour les occupants des véhicules de tourisme qui les percutent. L’évaluation des performances des barrières de sécurité vis-à-vis des véhicules les percutant est couverte par les normes EN 1317-1 et EN 1317-2.
Le présent document définit les classes de performance en tenant compte des classes de vitesse des motocyclistes, de la sévérité de choc et de la largeur de fonctionnement du dispositif vis-à-vis des chocs subis par les motocyclistes.
En ce qui concerne les dispositifs conçus pour être ajoutés à une barrière de sécurité normalisée, les résultats des essais sont uniquement valables si le dispositif est fixé au modèle de barrière de sécurité utilisé lors des essais, sachant que les performances ne seront pas nécessairement les mêmes si le dispositif est fixé à un modèle de barrière de sécurité différent.
Oprema cest - Oprema cest za ublažitev udarcev motoristov pri trkih v varnostno ograjo
Ta dokument določa zahteve glede odpornosti proti udarcem za sisteme, namenjene ublažitvi udarcev motoristov, ki po padcu z motorja drsijo po tleh in trčijo v varnostno ograjo. Zadevni zaščitni sistemi so sistemi, nameščeni na ograjo, ali ograje, posebej izdelane za zaščito motoristov ali zmanjšanje tveganja pri udarcih. Ta dokument ne vključuje ocene zmožnosti ograj za ublažitev udarca vozila in tveganja za potnike v vozilu ob trku. Ocena odpornosti ograj ob trku z vozili je vključena v standardih EN 1317-1 in EN 1317-2.
Ta dokument določa razrede učinkovitosti, pri čemer se upoštevajo razredi hitrosti voznika, moč udarca in delovna širina sistema glede na udarce voznika.
Kar zadeva sisteme, oblikovane za namestitev na standardno ograjo, so rezultati preskusa veljavni le, kadar je sistem nameščen na model ograje, ki se je uporabil v preskusih. Če je sistem nameščen na drugačno ograjo, učinkovitost ni nujno enaka.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-september-2019
Nadomešča:
SIST-TS CEN/TS 1317-8:2012
Oprema cest - Oprema cest za ublažitev udarcev motoristov pri trkih v varnostno
ograjo
Road restraint systems - Motorcycle road restraint systems which reduce the impact
severity of motorcyclist collisions with safety barriers
Rückhaltesysteme an Straßen - Rückhaltesysteme für Motorräder, die die
Anprallheftigkeit an Schutzplanken für Motorradfahrer reduzieren
Dispositifs de retenue routiers — Dispositifs de retenue routiers pour motos réduisant la
sévérité de choc en cas de collision de motocyclistes avec les barrières de sécurité
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN/TS 17342:2019
ICS:
13.200 Preprečevanje nesreč in Accident and disaster control
katastrof
93.080.30 Cestna oprema in pomožne Road equipment and
naprave installations
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
CEN/TS 17342
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
SPÉCIFICATION TECHNIQUE
June 2019
TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION
ICS 13.200; 93.080.30 Supersedes CEN/TS 1317-8:2012
English Version
Road restraint systems - Motorcycle road restraint
systems which reduce the impact severity of motorcyclist
collisions with safety barriers
Dispositifs de retenue routiers - Dispositifs de retenue Rückhaltesysteme an Straßen - Rückhaltesysteme für
routiers pour motos réduisant la sévérité de choc en Motorräder, die die Anprallheftigkeit an Schutzplanken
cas de collision de motocyclistes avec les barrières de für Motorradfahrer reduzieren
sécurité
This Technical Specification (CEN/TS) was approved by CEN on 15 April 2019 for provisional application.
The period of validity of this CEN/TS is limited initially to three years. After two years the members of CEN will be requested to
submit their comments, particularly on the question whether the CEN/TS can be converted into a European Standard.
CEN members are required to announce the existence of this CEN/TS in the same way as for an EN and to make the CEN/TS
available promptly at national level in an appropriate form. It is permissible to keep conflicting national standards in force (in
parallel to the CEN/TS) until the final decision about the possible conversion of the CEN/TS into an EN is reached.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey and United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2019 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN/TS 17342:2019 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents Page
European foreword . 4
Introduction . 5
1 Scope . 6
2 Normative references . 6
3 Terms and definitions . 6
4 Symbols and abbreviations . 7
5 Biomechanical indices for assessing the impact severity of a PTW rider against an
MPS . 8
5.1 General . 8
5.2 Index representing the head injury risk: Head injury criterion (HIC36) . 8
5.3 Indices representing neck injury risk . 8
6 Test methods . 9
6.1 General . 9
6.2 Test site . 9
6.3 Propulsion system . 10
6.4 ATD and instrumentation . 10
6.5 ATD clothing and equipment . 11
6.5.1 Helmet . 11
6.5.2 Clothing . 11
6.6 ATD mass including equipment . 11
6.7 Installation . 11
6.8 Impact conditions . 12
6.9 Launch configurations . 12
6.9.1 General . 12
6.9.2 Launch configuration 1: post-centred impact. 13
6.9.3 Launch configuration 2: post offset impact . 13
6.9.4 Launch configuration 3: mid-span impact . 14
6.10 Accuracies and deviation of impact speeds and angles . 15
6.10.1 ATD impact speed . 15
6.10.2 ATD approach angle . 15
6.10.3 ATD orientation . 16
6.10.4 ATD impact point . 16
6.11 Photographic coverage . 16
7 Performance classes . 17
7.1 General . 17
7.2 Speed classes. 18
7.3 Severity levels. 18
7.4 Deformation of the CMPS . 23
8 Acceptance criteria of the impact test . 23
8.1 MPS behaviour . 23
8.2 ATD behaviour . 23
8.3 Severity indices . 25
8.4 Vehicle impact performance . 25
9 Test report . 25
Annex A (informative) Detailed report template . 26
Annex B (informative) Anthropomorphic test device . 31
Annex C (informative) Helmet alignment tool . 33
Annex D (informative) Modification of the anthropomorphic test device shoulder . 35
Annex E (informative) Reference helmet . 43
Annex F (informative) Helmet calibration procedure . 44
F.1 General . 44
F.2 Helmet description. 44
F.3 Procedure description and layout . 44
F.4 Helmet assessment . 45
Bibliography . 47
European foreword
This document (CEN/TS 17342:2019) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 226 “Road
equipment”, the secretariat of which is held by AFNOR.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
This document supersedes CEN/TS 1317-8:2012.
The significant technical changes incorporated in this revision are updates of the European foreword, the
Scope and Subclause 6.2, Test site.
CEN/TS 1317-8 needed to be brought into line with EN 1317 in development (merging of
EN 1317-1:2010, EN 1317-2:2010, EN 1317-3:2010, EN 1317-5, EN 1317-7 and additional test methods
for removable barrier sections).
According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organisations of the
following countries are bound to announce this Technical Specification: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,
France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey and the United Kingdom.
Introduction
In order to improve safety, the design of roads may require the installation of road restraint systems,
which are intended to contain and redirect errant vehicles safely for the benefit of the occupants and
other road users, or pedestrian parapets designed to restrain and to guide pedestrians and other road
users not using vehicles, on sections of road and at particular locations defined by the national or local
authorities.
EN 1317-2 contains performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for barriers.
Whereas EN 1317-2 covers the performance of these systems with respect to cars and heavy vehicles,
this document addresses the safety of the riders of powered two-wheeled vehicles impacting the barrier
having fallen from their vehicle.
As powered two-wheeler riders may impact a barrier directly (in which case no protection is offered by
the vehicle), special attention is given to these vulnerable road-users. In order to minimize the
consequences to a rider of such an impact, it may be necessary to fit a barrier with a specific PTW rider
protection system. Alternatively, a barrier might specifically incorporate characteristics limiting the
consequences of a PTW rider impact.
Rider protection systems may be continuous (i
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.