SIST-TP IEC/TR 61000-5-3:2004
(Main)Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 5-3: Installation and mitigation guidelines - HEMP protection concepts
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 5-3: Installation and mitigation guidelines - HEMP protection concepts
This technical report provides elements for:[
]- the design of an adequate protection for civil facilities against the electromagnetic pulse due to a high altitude nuclear explosion, denoted in what follows by HEMP;[
]- the evaluation of already existing protections with respect to stresses imposed by HEMP;[
]- to compare the requirements of HEMP and lightning protection in order to show if they can be combined at low cost;[
]- to emphasise the differences between the requirements of HEMP and lightning protections in order to permit the evaluation of the consequences of HEMP when no additional measures are taken except existing lightning protection.
Compatibilité électromagnétique (CEM) - Partie 5-3: Guides d'installation et d'atténuation - Concepts de protection IEMN-HA
Ce rapport technique fournit des éléments permettant:[
]- de mettre au point un système de protection adéquat des bâtiments publics contre les impulsions électromagnétiques dues aux explosions nucléaires à haute altitude et designées ci-après par IEMN-HA;[
]- d'évaluer les systèmes de protection existants en tenant compte des contraintes imposées par l'IEMN-HA;[
]- de comparer les spécifications de protection contre la foudre et contre l'IEMN-HA pour déterminer si elles peuvent être combinées à faible coût;[
]- de souligner les différences entre les spécifications de protection contre l'IEMN-HA et les spécifications de protection contre la foudre pour permettre d'évaluer les conséquences de l'IEMN-HA quand aucune mesure de protection supplémentaire n'est prise, hormis celles concernant la foudre.
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 5-3: Installation and mitigation guidelines - HEMP protection concepts
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI SIST-TP IEC/TR 61000-5-3:2004
STANDARD
april 2004
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 5-3: Installation and mitigation
guidelines - HEMP protection concepts
ICS 33.100.01 Referenčna številka
SIST-TP IEC/TR 61000-5-3:2004(en)
© Standard je založil in izdal Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje ali kopiranje celote ali delov tega dokumenta ni dovoljeno
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
RAPPORT CEI
TECHNIQUE IEC
TR 61000-5-3
TECHNICAL
Première édition
REPORT
First edition
1999-07
PUBLICATION FONDAMENTALE EN CEM
BASIC EMC PUBLICATION
Compatibilité électromagnétique (CEM) –
Partie 5-3:
Guides d'installation et d'atténuation –
Concepts de protection IEMN-HA
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) –
Part 5-3:
Installation and mitigation guidelines –
HEMP protection concepts
IEC 1999 Droits de reproduction réservés Copyright - all rights reserved
Aucune partie de cette publication ne peut être reproduite ni No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in
utilisée sous quelque forme que ce soit et par aucun procédé, any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
électronique ou mécanique, y compris la photo-copie et les including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in
microfilms, sans l'accord écrit de l'éditeur. writing from the publisher.
International Electrotechnical Commission 3, rue de Varembé Geneva, Switzerland
Telefax: +41 22 919 0300 e-mail: inmail@iec.ch IEC web site http://www.iec.ch
CODE PRIX
Commission Electrotechnique Internationale
X
PRICE CODE
International Electrotechnical Commission
Pour prix, voir catalogue en vigueur
For price, see current catalogue
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
TR 61000-5-3 © IEC:1999 – 3 –
CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD . 7
INTRODUCTION .9
Clause
1 Scope . 11
2 Reference documents . 11
3 Definitions. 13
4 General. 13
5 Protection principles. 15
5.1 General. 15
5.2 Zoning . 15
5.3 Protection against radiated disturbance . 17
5.4 Protection against conducted disturbance. 17
5.5 Wiring and installation guidelines . 19
5.5.1 Points of entry. 19
5.5.2 Wiring concepts . 19
5.5.3 Cables . 21
5.6 Relation between HEMP and lightning protection principles . 21
5.6.1 HEMP and lightning sources. 23
5.6.2 HEMP and lightning protections . 23
5.6.3 Discussion on the two types of environment. 25
6 Component selection. 27
6.1 Selection of circuit components . 27
6.2 Selection of protective devices against radiated disturbance . 29
6.3 Selection of protective devices against conducted disturbance. 29
6.3.1 General. 29
6.3.2 Device categories. 29
6.3.3 Protection of typical line interfaces . 37
7 Protection concepts. 43
7.1 General considerations . 43
7.2 Topological considerations . 43
7.3 Definition of protection concepts. 45
7.3.1 Building protection concepts . 45
7.3.2 Protection concepts for shielded enclosures . 47
8 Comparison of protection measures against conducted disturbances due to HEMP and
lightning electromagnetic pulse (LEMP) . 49
8.1 General. 49
8.2 Peak current î . 49
8.3 Maximum di/dt . 51
8.4 Maximum du/dt . 51
8.5 Integral i × dt. 51
2
8.6 Integral i × dt. 51
8.7 Time to half-value . 53
8.8 Conclusions on the comparisons between HEMP and LEMP protection. 53
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
TR 61000-5-3 © IEC:1999 – 5 –
Page
Annex A Early-time HEMP and lightning radiated environments. 55
Annex B Arrangement showing the use of a distribution transformer with a primary delta
winding . 75
Annex C Transmission characteristics of protective measures . 77
Figure 1 – Example of penetration of radiated and conducted disturbances through
a two-barrier protection. . 15
Figure 2 – Voltage and current flowing through a gas arrester during a surge event. 19
Figure 3 – Concepts for wiring systems. 21
Figure 4 – Typical protection circuit. 35
Figure 5 – Solution to prevent surge current from radiating into protected area. 53
Table 1 – Building protection concepts. 45
Table 2 – Protection concepts for shielded enclosures . 47
Table 3 – Lightning and HEMP current waveforms which can be used for tests. 49
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
TR 61000-5-3 © IEC:1999 – 7 –
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION
____________
ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC) –
Part 5-3: Installation and mitigation guidelines –
HEMP protection concepts
FOREWORD
1) The IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) is a worldwide organization for standardization comprising
all national electrotechnical committees (IEC National Committees). The object of the IEC is to promote
international co-operation on all questions concerning standardization in the electrical and electronic fields. To
this end and in addition to other activities, the IEC publishes International Standards. Their preparation is
entrusted to technical committees; any IEC National Committee interested in the subject dealt with may
participate in this preparatory work. International, governmental and non-governmental organizations liaising
with the IEC also participate in this preparation. The IEC collaborates closely with the International Organization
for Standardization (ISO) in accordance with conditions determined by agreement between the two
organizations.
2) The formal decisions or agreements of the IEC on technical matters express, as nearly as possible, an
international consensus of opinion on the relevant subjects since each technical committee has representation
from all interested National Committees.
3) The documents produced have the form of recommendations for international use and are published in the form
of standards, technical reports, technical specifications or guides and they are accepted by the National
Committees in that sense.
4) In order to promote international unification, IEC National Committees undertake to apply IEC International
Standards transparently to the maximum extent possible in their national and regional standards. Any
divergence between the IEC Standard and the corresponding national or regional standard shall be clearly
indicated in the latter.
5) The IEC provides no marking procedure to indicate its approval and cannot be rendered responsible for any
equipment declared to be in conformity with one of its standards.
6) Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this technical report may be the subject of
patent rights. The IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
The main task of IEC technical committees is to prepare International Standards. However, a
technical committee may propose the publication of a technical report when it has collected
data of a different kind from that which is normally published as an International Standard, for
example "state of the art".
Technical reports do not necessarily have to be reviewed until the data they provide are
considered to be no longer valid or useful by the maintenance team.
IEC 61000-5-3, which is a technical report, has been prepared by subcommittee 77C: Immunity
to high altitude nuclear electromagnetic pulse (HEMP), of IEC technical committee 77:
Electromagnetic compatibility.
It has the status of a basic EMC publication in accordance with IEC Guide 107.
The text of this technical report is based on the following documents:
Enquiry draft Report on voting
77C/58/CDV 77C/69/RVC
Full information on the voting for the approval of this technical report can be found in the report
on voting indicated in the above table.
This publication has been drafted in accordance with the ISO/IEC directives, Part 3.
This document, which is purely informative is not to be regarded as an International Standard.
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
TR 61000-5-3 © IEC:1999 – 9 –
INTRODUCTION
IEC 61000-5 is a part of the IEC 61000 series, according to the following structure:
Part 1: General
General considerations (introduction, fundamental principles)
Definitions, terminology
Part 2: Environment
Description of the environment
Classification of the environment
Compatibility levels
Part 3: Limits
Emission limits
Immunity limits (in so far as these limits do not fall under the responsibility of the product
committees)
Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques
Measurement techniques
Testing techniques
Part 5: Installation and mitigation guidelines
Installation guidelines
Mitigation methods and devices
Part 6: Generic standards
Part 9: Miscellaneous
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
TR 61000-5-3 © IEC:1999 – 11 –
ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC) –
Part 5-3: Installation and mitigation guidelines –
HEMP protection concepts
1 Scope
This part of IEC 61000 defines and gives information on protection concepts against
electromagnetic pulse due to a high altitude nuclear explosion (denoted in what follows by the
abbreviation HEMP).
The aim of this technical report is to provide elements for
– the design of an adequate protection for civil facilities against HEMP;
– the evaluation of already existing protections with respect to stresses imposed by HEMP;
– the comparison of the requirements of HEMP and lightning protection in order to show if
they can be combined at low cost;
– an emphasis of the differences between the requirements of HEMP and lightning protection
in order to permit an evaluation of the consequences of HEMP when no additional
measures are taken beyond existing lightning protection.
2 Reference documents
IEC 60050(161):1990, International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV) – Chapter 161:
Electromagnetic compatibility
IEC 60060-2:1994, High voltage test techniques – Part 2: Measuring systems
IEC 60099-1:1991, Surge arresters – Part 1: Non-linear resistor type gapped arresters for a.c.
systems
IEC 61000-2-9:1996, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 2: Environment – Section 9:
Description of HEMP environment – Radiated disturbance. Basic EMC publication
IEC 61000-2-10:1998, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 2-10: Environment –
Description of HEMP environment – Conducted disturbance. Basic EMC publication
IEC 61000-2-11, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 2-11: Environment – Description
1)
of HEMP environment – Classification of HEMP environments
IEC 61000-4-5:1995, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 4: Testing and measurement
techniques – Section 5: Surge immunity test
___________
1)
To be published.
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
TR 61000-5-3 © IEC:1999 – 13 –
IEC 61000-4-23, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 4-23: Testing and measurement
techniques – Test methods for protective devices for HEMP and other radiated disturbance.
1)
Basic EMC publication
IEC 61000-4-24:1997, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 4: Testing and measurement
techniques – Section 24: Test methods for protective devices for HEMP conducted
disturbances. Basic EMC publication.
IEC 61000-4-25, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 4-25: Testing and measurement
techniques – HEMP requirements and test methods for equipment and systems. Basic EMC
1)
Publication
IEC/TR 61000-5-4:1996, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 5: Installation and
mitigation guidelines – Section 4: Immunity to HEMP – Specification for protective devices
against HEMP radiated disturbance. Basic EMC Publication
IEC 61000-5-5:1996, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 5: Installation and mitigation
guidelines – Section 5: Specification of protective devices for HEMP conducted disturbance.
Basic EMC Publication
IEC 61312-1:1995, Protection against lightning electromagnetic impulse – Part 1: General
principles
3 Definitions
For the purpose of this technical report, the definitions of IEC 60050(161) together with the
following definitions apply.
3.1
electromagnetic barrier
topologically closed surface made to prevent or limit EM fields and conducted transients from
entering the enclosed space. The barrier consists of the shield surface and points-of-entry
treatments and encloses the protected volume
3.2
penetration
transfer of electromagnetic energy through an electromagnetic barrier from one volume to
another. This can take place in different ways: by diffusion through the barrier, through
apertures and through conductors connecting the two volumes (wires, cables, conduits, pipes,
ducts, etc.)
4 General
The subject of HEMP is covered from an environmental point of view in clause 3 of
IEC 61000-2-9 and IEC 61000-2-10.
The discussion of the protection concepts refers to shielding procedures for buildings,
equipments and connections between them (transmission lines and cables). The term
"shielding" is used here in its more general sense, i.e. cages, cabinets, shielded cables,
filtering and surge suppressors.
___________
1)
To be published.
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
TR 61000-5-3 © IEC:1999 – 15 –
5 Protection principles
5.1 General
This subclause deals with general protection principles that can be applied to most of the
protection concepts as defined in clause 7.
In protected areas (buildings, installations, systems or equipment), two main sources of
disturbance – direct electromagnetic radiation (radiated disturbance) and conducted pene-
tration of voltage and current surges (conducted disturbance) – are foreseen (see figure 1).
E, H
E H
st
1st barrier
1 barrier
(building)
E, H (shielding)
E H
2nd band rrier
2 barrier
(shielding)
(shielding)
EquiEquipmpmentent
Conducted penetration with
Conducted penetration with
lightning protection
lightning protection
EMI protection
EMI protection
Lightning
IEC 801/99
& EMI protection
Figure 1 – Example of penetration of radiated and conducted disturbances
through a two-barrier protection
This figure shows an example of an installation protected by two barriers. The radiated
disturbance may be attenuated by construction elements of buildings (concrete, rebars and
other metal parts, etc.) or by metal shields installed specifically for this purpose. Protection
against conducted disturbances penetrating via incoming and outgoing lines may be achieved
by momentarily short-circuiting the line to the shield, by frequency bandwidth limitation or by
combinations of both (e.g. surge protectors plus filters). Very often, such protection already
exists in many buildings against lightning. As discussed below, a check shall be performed to
decide if the lightning protection complies at least partially with the needs for protection against
HEMP. Surge protectors are extremely non-linear elements. Below a certain voltage, their
resistance is in the megohm range but during conduction it may be down to less than 1 mΩ.
Their effectiveness cannot therefore be expressed in decibels or directly compared to shield
effectiveness. The insertion loss of a line filter and the radiation attenuation of a shield also
describe two completely different items. Nevertheless, it should be noted that, when the
residual voltage (or energy) on a line in the protected area is comparable to the voltage (or
energy) that can be induced on the line by fields penetrating the shield, further reduction of the
conducted voltage (or energy) will not be very beneficial.
5.2 Zoning
In a spatially extended system, it may be advisable to define zones of different disturbance
levels. One reason for this may be that parts of the system are not essential and therefore do
not need to be protected, or that some parts of the system are not as susceptible as others.
Correct zoning implies that sufficient penetration protection be applied to make the residual
conducted disturbance comparable to the radiated disturbance within a zone, so that
conducted interference is not a dominant disturbance within the zone. A definition of zoning
and a classification of protection zones from an EMC point of view is given in 5.2 of
IEC 61000-5-6. This comparison can be performed only by comparing the susceptibility of a
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
TR 61000-5-3 © IEC:1999 – 17 –
given equipment to each kind of disturbance. The susceptibility of the equipment can be
determined by specific tests described in IEC 61000-4-25, but the comparison is not
straightforward because the equipment can be more or less susceptible to one type of
disturbance.
The boundary of a zone is defined by a mechanical structure (concrete building wall, rebar
structure or solid metal shield) that has a certain radiation attenuation whose magnitude as a
function of the degree of protection is defined in clause 7. Lines penetrating zone boundaries
shall be protected against conducted disturbance at every point of entry. If a line penetrates
several boundaries, the protective devices shall be coordinated as described in 6.3.3.6. In
imperfect shields, i.e. shields with an average attenuation of less than 40 dB from about
14 kHz to 1 GHz (see also IEC 61000-5-4), special care shall be taken that shield currents do
not radiate into the zone and do not produce inductive voltage drops between the different
points of entry. In such a case, it is advisable to have only one point of entry (single point
entry) per zone.
5.3 Protection against radiated disturbance
One function of a shield is to attenuate free-field radiation and to prevent radiation from line
currents and shield currents from entering the protected area. This is an important issue for
imperfect shields. Mechanical structures such as concrete walls, rebar meshes and metallic
structural elements may contribute to the total field attenuation if properly integrated in a multi-
shield concept. Optimal use of these structures can only be made if each shield is spatially
separated from each other and penetrating lines (and ground connections) enter the shields
only at one point per shield. Only by this means can line currents be prevented from flowing
into and across protected areas (see figure 1).
5.4 Protection against conducted disturbance
Protective devices shall fulfil two often contradictory requirements. During a surge event
(lightning or HEMP) they shall protect the connected equipment either by insulating the
longitudinal path or by short-circuiting the transversal path. In the absence of a surge, they
should influence the normal operation of the equipment as little as possible. The transition
between the two stages should happen within a few nanoseconds or less.
A surge event in a protective device can be described in terms of voltage or current as a
function of time. Figure 2 shows an example using a gas arrester. During the first phase, as
the voltage rises, the (primary) protection element is still in its insulating state. In this phase,
no significant current flows through the device and the event can be treated considering only
the breakdown voltage of the dielectric material of the protection element. It is only when the
voltage reaches the breakdown or limiting level that a current starts to flow through the
protection element and that the thermal process described in terms of action, i.e. proportional
t
f
2
to i dt , shall be taken into account,
∫
t
i
t being the initial time of the phenomenon, and
i
t being the final time of the phenomenon.
f
Prior to choosing protective devices, the following questions shall be answered:
– how often do disturbances (lightning) occur?
– which surge parameters are expected (from lightning and HEMP)?
– what is the maximum residual voltage for each waveform that the equipment connected at
the interface can withstand?
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
TR 61000-5-3 © IEC:1999 – 19 –
– what is the function of the connected equipment or interface?
which parasitic characteristics (longitudinal impedance, insertion loss, capacity, etc.) of the
protective device are allowed that do not disturb normal operation ?
U
U max
U
du max
U
du
dt
dt
max
max
t
t
I
max
I
I max
I
di
di
ddtt
maxmax
t
t
IEC 802/99
Figure 2 – Voltage and current flowing through a gas arrester during a surge event
As different protective devices may function in different ways, the requirements or
specifications for each device type shall be formulated in a manner appropriate to its
functioning. For instance, it would not make sense to require a specific firing voltage for a
varistor or a minimum energy absorbance for a gas arrester.
5.5 Wiring and installation guidelines
5.5.1 Points of entry
With multiple points of entry into an imperfect shield, inductive voltage drops caused by
surge currents flowing on the shield may couple into the protected area and thus by-pass the
conducted protective measures. Multiple grounding points inside an imperfect shield increase
common mode coupling of the remaining radiation field to the system. It is therefore advan-
tageous to have a single entry point for all cables. This means that all protective measures for
penetrating cables should be located on the shield and as close together as possible. This also
means that ground potential for all equipment within the protected area should be taken
exclusively from the location of the single entry point. In 5.6 it is assumed that only a single
point entry and single point grounding are used, and that the equipment housings are insulated
from the building (rebars, metallic construction parts, etc.).
5.5.2 Wiring concepts
Two basic concepts for wiring between the point of entry and the internal equipment are shown
in figures 3a and 3b.
In a mesh-shaped wiring system (see figure 3a), the shield’s internal connections can be
installed arbitrarily, permitting induction loops. Penetrating fields induce voltages and currents
in wiring loops that may affect the system. Therefore, this concept should only be used with
nearly perfect shields where field intensities are low and/or with shielded cables or shielded
cable ducts. It should be noted, however, that large loops may lead to mutual interference
between equipment in a shielded enclosure.
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
TR 61000-5-3 © IEC:1999 – 21 –
A tree-shaped wiring system (see figure 3b) contains only loops with a very small area. The
penetrating field may induce only common-mode signals to which the system is less
susceptible (the signals on the lines and on the system ground are of the same magnitude and
phase). This wiring concept is preferably used within low attenuation shields. If high quality
shielded cables and/or metal cable ducts are used, the requirement for shield attenuation may
be further reduced.
Shield
shield
Single point
single point
entry
entry
Equipment
equipm.
IEC 803/99
Figure 3a - Mesh-shaped wiring system
shield
Shield
Single point
single point
entry
entry
Equipment
equipm.
IEC 804/99
Figure 3b – Tree-shaped wiring system
Figure 3 – Concepts for wiring systems
5.5.3 Cables
If shielded cables or shielded cable ducts are used, the shields shall be interconnected
between the sections, whether they are in a tree- or mesh-shaped configuration. The
equipment chassis shall also be connected to the shields of the cables. It is highly advisable to
implement the concept of shielding continuity, i.e. to use good quality connectors for the entry
points of the cables into the equipment and to avoid pigtails which are, in practice, ineffective
from an EMC point of view. The pigtails can provide only a protection for persons in case of
short circuits of the mains (at power frequency 50 Hz or 60 Hz) to a cable sheath.
5.6 Relation between HEMP and lightning protection principles
From the source point of view, lightning and HEMP are quite different but the radiated and
conducted environments produced by the two phenomena are very similar. Thus, HEMP
protection principles for civil applications shall take advantage of already installed lightning
protection. The designer of the HEMP protection shall estimate if, by admitting a certain risk,
the lightning protection can also be considered to be sufficient against HEMP as well. The aim
of this subclause is to discuss basic features of the HEMP and lightning environments in order
to define a strategy for protecting the equipment.
---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
TR 61000-5-3 © IEC:1999 – 23 –
5.6.1 HEMP and lightning sources
The sources of lightning effects are the first and subsequent return stroke currents. These
currents may directly hit a line, an equipment, an installation or a building and, as such,
represent the primary lightning conducted environment. If the lightning does not hit parts of the
installation directly, then the lightning current produces an electromagnetic field which
represents a radiated lightning environment. This field will induce voltages and currents in
nearby circuits, producing a secondary lightning conducted environment.
The primary source of effects from HEMP is the radiated electromagnetic field which, by
coupling to transmission lines or to different kinds of circuits, produces the voltages and
currents representing the HEMP conducted environment.
5.6.2 HEMP and lightning protections
The protection concepts for HEMP and for lightning are not the same. Different approaches
are used for radiated and conducted environments.
5.6.2.1 Radiated environment
As covered in clause 7, the attenuation capability of a shielded room should be suitable to
protect the vital equipment against HEMP. Shielded enclosures are not normally used for
protection against lightning radiated electromagnetic fields, except perhaps for very particular
cases, but advantage is taken from the attenuation offered by the metallic structures of the
buildings. Advantage is also taken from shielded cables between two sets of equipment
installed for EMC purposes to provide protection against lightning electromagnetic fields.
5.6.2.2 Conducted environmen
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.