iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
ASTM

ASTM E2239-02

(Practice)

Standard Practice for Record Keeping and Record Preservation for Lead Hazard Activities

Standard Practice for Record Keeping and Record Preservation for Lead Hazard Activities

SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes requirements for preservation of records generated during lead hazard activities.
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
09-Oct-2002
ICS
91.120.01 - Protection of and in buildings in general
Technical Committee
E06 - Performance of Buildings
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Replaced By
ASTM E2239-03 - Standard Practice for Record Keeping and Record Preservation for Lead Hazard Activities
Effective Date
10-Apr-2003
Referred By
ASTM E2252-22 - Standard Practice for Selection of Lead Hazard Reduction Methods for Identified Risks in Residential Housing or Child Occupied Facilities
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E1729-20 - Standard Practice for Field Collection of Dried Paint Samples for Subsequent Lead Determination
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E2271/E2271M-22 - Standard Practice for Clearance Examinations Following Lead Hazard Reduction Activities in Multifamily Dwellings
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E2115-22 - Standard Guide for Conducting Lead Hazard Assessments of Dwellings and of Other Child-Occupied Facilities
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E2914/E2914M-21 - Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Extraction of Lead from Composited Wipe Samples
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E1605-22 - Standard Terminology Relating to Lead in Buildings
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E1908-20 - Standard Practice for Sample Selection of Debris Waste from a Building Renovation or Lead Abatement Project for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) Testing for Leachable Lead (Pb)
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E1727-20 - Standard Practice for Field Collection of Soil Samples for Subsequent Lead Determination
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E1792-20 - Standard Specification for Wipe Sampling Materials for Lead in Surface Dust
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E2913/E2913M-21 - Standard Practice for Hotplate Digestion of Lead from Composited Wipe Samples
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E3193-21 - Standard Test Method for Measurement of Lead (Pb) in Dust by Wipe, Paint, and Soil by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (FAAS)
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E1644-21 - Standard Practice for Hot Plate Digestion of Dust Wipe Samples for the Determination of Lead
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E1728/E1728M-20 - Standard Practice for Collection of Settled Dust Samples Using Wipe Sampling Methods for Subsequent Lead Determination
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002
Referred By
ASTM E2255/E2255M-22 - Standard Practice for Conducting Visual Assessments for Lead Hazards in Buildings
Effective Date
10-Oct-2002

Buy Standard

ASTM E2239-02 - Standard Practice for Record Keeping and Record Preservation for Lead Hazard ActivitiesASTM E2239-02 - Standard Practice for Record Keeping and Record Preservation for Lead Hazard Activities
PreviousNext
Standard
ASTM E2239-02 - Standard Practice for Record Keeping and Record Preservation for Lead Hazard Activities
English language
3 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superceded and replaced by a new version or discontinued.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information.
Designation: E 2239 – 02
Standard Practice for
Record Keeping and Record Preservation for Lead Hazard
Activities
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 2239; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3.1.3 conformity, n—fulfillment of a requirement.
ISO 9000-2000
1.1 This practice describes requirements for preservation of
3.1.4 evaluation, n—for lead hazards, a general term to
records generated during lead hazard activities.
include risk (hazard) assessment, visual assessment, clearance
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the
examination, paint inspection and the results of testing for lead.
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
3.1.5 inspection, n—conformity evaluation by observation
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
and judgment accompanied as appropriate by measurement,
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
testing or gauging.
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
3.1.6 lead hazard activities, n—procedures, measures, and
actions including abatement, clearance, control, inspection,
2. Referenced Documents
maintenance, management, quality systems, reduction, and risk
2.1 ASTM Standards:
assessment pertaining to lead hazards in buildings.
D 4840 Guide for Sampling Chain-of-Custody Procedures
3.1.7 nonconformity, n—non-fulfillment of a requirement.
E 1579 Guide for Ensuring Data Integrity in Highly Com-
ISO 9000-2000
puterized Laboratory Operations
3.1.8 observation, n—a statement of fact made during the
E 1605 Terminology Relating to Abatement of Hazards
evaluation and substantiated by objective evidence.
from Lead-Based Paint in Buildings and Related Struc-
4 ISO 10011-1
tures
3.1.9 objective evidence, n—data supporting the existence
2.2 ISO Standards:
or verity of something. ISO 9000-2000
ISO 9000-3 Quality Management and Quality Assurance
3.1.9.1 Discussion—Objective evidence may be obtained
Standards—Part 3: Guidelines for the Application of ISO
through observation, measurement, test, or other means.
9001:1994 to the Development, Supply, Installation and
5 3.1.10 procedure, n—specified way to carry out an activity
Maintenance of Computer Software
or process. ISO 9000-2000
ISO 9000-2000 Quality Management Systems—
5 3.1.10.1 Discussion—In many cases, procedures are docu-
Fundamentals and Vocabulary
mented (for example, quality system procedures). When a
ISO 10011-1 Guidelines for Auditing Quality Systems—
5 procedure is documented, the term “written procedure” or
Part 1: Auditing
“documented procedure” is frequently used. A written or
3. Terminology documented procedure usually contains the purposes and scope
of an activity; what shall be done and by whom; when, where
3.1 Definitions:
and how it shall be done; what materials, equipment and how
3.1.1 For definitions of terms relating to this practice that do
documents shall be used; and how it shall be controlled and
not appear in this section, refer to Terminology E 1605.
recorded.
3.1.2 competence, n—demonstrated ability to apply knowl-
3.1.11 record, n—a document stating results achieved or
edge and skills. ISO 9000-2000
providing evidence of activities performed.
3.1.12 requirement, n—need or expectation that is generally
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on Perfor- implied or obligatory. ISO 9000-2000
mance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.23 on Lead
3.1.13 traceability, n—ability to trace the history, applica-
Hazards Associated With Buildings.
tion, or location of that which is under consideration.
Current edition approved Oct. 10, 2002. Published November 2002.
ISO 9000-2000
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 11.01.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 14.02.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.11. 4. Significance and Use
Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,
4.1 This practice is intended to help reduce risks associated
4th Floor, New York, NY 10036.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
NOTICE: This standard has either been superceded and replaced by a new version or discontinued.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information.
E2239–02
with lead hazards in buildings by providing standardized be defined in terms of the associated ASTM standard.
requirements for preserving records, findings, and recommen- 5.3.2.2 All entries shall be made using water insoluble ink.
dations associated with lead hazard activities. 5.3.2.3 Data forms shall be signed or initialed, and dated
4.1.1 Lead hazard activities include inspections and evalu- each workday by the person(s) generating the forms and the
ations to identify lead-based paint and potential lead hazards reviewer, where possible.
associated with leaded paint, interim control, paint stabiliza- 5.3.2.4 Data forms shall be numbered in a “page of page”
tion, standard treatments, ongoing leaded paint maintenance format for each activity.
activities, rehabilitation, repair, renovation, remodeling, long- 5.3.3 Graphs and Drawings:
term reevaluation of lead hazards and clearance activities. 5.3.3.1 Graphs and drawing shall be labeled so that a person
4.2 This practice is intended for use by individuals and with competence in performing lead hazard activities and
organizations that develop and have need to preserve objective unfamiliar with their generation can decipher them.
evidence when contracting for or when conducting lead hazard 5.3.4 Chain-of-Custody Forms:
activities themselves. 5.3.4.1 Chain of custody forms (see Guide D 4840) shall be
completed and labeled with the lead hazard activity (name,
5. Records
address, and other appropriate information).
5.3.5 Photographs:
5.1 General Requirements:
5.3.5.1 Records shall be created and traceable to both the
5.1.1 Records of original observations, evidence of confor-
photograph and to the lead hazard activity (for example, name,
mity or nonconformity to requirements, and derived data shall
address, and other appropriate information), the name of the
contain sufficient information to provide traceability and to
person taking the photograph, and the date taken.
enable an individual having competence with lead hazard
activities to reach the same conclusion(s).
NOTE 2—Photographs may be taken using film or digital means (see
5.1.2 Observations, data, and calculations shall be recorded
5.3.8).
at the time they are made and shall be identifiable to the
5.3.6 Lead Hazard Activity Reports:
specific task.
5.3.6.1 Each lead hazard activity report shall be maintained
5.1.2.1 In cases where written records are damaged and
in either hard copy or electronic copy, as appropriate.
unusable (that i
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

ASTM
ASTM E2239-24(Practice)
Standard Practice for Record Keeping and Record Preservation for Lead Hazard Activities

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This practice is intended to help reduce risks associated with lead hazards in buildings by providing standardized requirements for preserving records, findings, and recommendations associated with lead hazard activities.  
4.2 This practice is intended for use by individuals and organizations that develop and have need to preserve objective evidence when contracting for or when conducting lead hazard activities themselves.  
4.2.1 This practice is intended to assist in complying with management system requirements for record keeping promulgated by authorities having jurisdiction regarding conduct of lead hazard activities.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes requirements for preservation of records generated during lead hazard activities.  
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F3627-24(Guide)
Standard Guide for Premises Design Considering Snow and Ice Management for the Reduction of Pedestrian Slips

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This guide is intended to act as an aid during the planning, risk management, design, renovation, construction, and ongoing maintenance phases of a project by persons/entities involved (including, engineers, architects, project management personnel/facilities management, contractors, inspectors, risk managers, safety committees, government agencies, and snow removal companies and owners) to reduce snow and ice slip hazards on walkway surfaces. This guide is also intended to complement aspects from Guide F2966 to promote the management of snow and ice on premises using prevention through design strategies.
SCOPE
1.1 This guide covers design, planning, construction, renovation, maintenance, and risk management considerations of the physical exterior property with regard to snow and ice management for the purpose of reducing the risk of pedestrian slips. The provisions in this guide may also apply to the analysis of existing properties.  
1.2 Conformance with this guide may reduce, but will not eliminate, the potential for slip incidents in which the presence or accumulation of snow and ice on walkways may be a contributing factor.  
1.3 Units—The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Guide
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Guide
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E2131-16(2022)(Practice)
Standard Practice for Addressing and Reporting Losses of Tangible Property

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Losses of property are indicators of the effectiveness of operations. Excessive losses can indicate poor internal management and controls, policy or procedural weaknesses, or lack of compliance, any one of which can have a negative impact on profitability, mission, performance, or reputation.  
5.2 Addressing and reporting losses provides indicators of needed potential action by decision makers.  
5.3 Though the term equipment is used consistently throughout this practice, this process may be used for the other classes of property, for example, raw material in inventory.  
5.4 This practice does not change any requirements that may be imposed through law, regulations, contract terms, and conditions.
Note 1: When this practice is submitted in response to a contract solicitation and evaluated as part of a contract award process, this practice may be deemed a representation.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice focuses on addressing and reporting losses of tangible property.  
1.2 Loss occurrences are key aspects of risk management. Projecting the possibility or probability of losses, discovering, disclosing, reporting, managing, and minimizing losses to a reasonable extent is a critical economic factor in the success of the owning or holding entity. This practice also establishes acceptable levels of losses.  
1.3 Losses are often discovered as a result of an occurrence, a physical inventory, property custodian or entity self-assessment, or external audit. An actual loss occurrence can be at any time during the property life cycle.  
1.4 Assessing and determining financial liability for losses is not addressed in this practice; such assessments are generally subject to individual contracts or other arrangements.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    4 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E2252-22(Practice)
Standard Practice for Selection of Lead Hazard Reduction Methods for Identified Risks in Residential Housing or Child Occupied Facilities

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This practice outlines lead hazard reduction methods that have been shown to be effective in preventing lead poisoning in children.  
4.2 This practice tabulates advantages, disadvantages, and relative costs of the reduction methods to assist professionals such as certified lead-based paint risk assessors, supervisors, or project designers in selecting appropriate cost-effective options for controlling lead hazards identified during a lead risk assessment. Different control methods may be equally effective in controlling a given lead hazard and, consequently, the selection of a specific control method may depend on the needs and economic constraints of the client or building owner.  
4.3 This practice is intended to complement other lead hazard activities that are performed in accordance with regulations promulgated by authorities having jurisdiction. For example, in some jurisdictions, a lead hazard risk assessment, by regulation, consists of a visual assessment, a hazard assessment including environmental monitoring for lead, and selection of lead hazard reduction methods.  
4.4 This practice is intended to assist homeowners, owners and occupants of rental property, lenders, insurers, and others who have interest in selecting options for controlling lead hazards associated with leaded paint, dust, or soil.  
4.5 This practice complements Guide E2115. Information and data gathered in accordance with Guide E2115 and this practice are used in preparing a risk assessment report. Subsequent lead hazards are mitigated through implementation of controls selected in accordance with this present practice.  
4.6 This practice addresses the most commonly used lead hazard reduction methods. It is left to users of this practice to identify the advantages, disadvantages, and relative costs associated with emerging control technologies for comparison with these characteristics of established lead hazard control methods.  
4.7 This practice does not address specific his...
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes the selection of lead hazard reduction methods for controlling lead hazard risks identified during risk assessments of residential dwellings and child occupied facilities.  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to inch-pound units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.3 This practice contains notes, which are explanatory and are not part of the mandatory requirements of this standard.  
1.4 Methods described in this practice may not meet or be allowed by requirements or regulations established by local authorities having jurisdiction. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to comply with all such requirements and regulations.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    9 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    9 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F1637-21(Practice)
Standard Practice for Safe Walking Surfaces

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This practice addresses elements along and in walkways including floors and walkway surfaces, sidewalks, short flight stairs, gratings, wheel stops, and speed bumps. Swimming pools, bath tubs, showers, natural walks, and unimproved paths are beyond the scope of this practice.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers design and construction guidelines and minimum maintenance criteria for new and existing buildings and structures. This practice is intended to provide reasonably safe walking surfaces for pedestrians wearing ordinary footwear. These guidelines may not be adequate for those with certain mobility impairments.  
1.2 Conformance with this practice will not alleviate all hazards; however, conformance will reduce certain pedestrian risks.  
1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D6356/D6356M-98(2024)(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Hydrogen Gas Generation of Aluminum Emulsified Asphalt Used as a Protective Coating for Roofing

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This procedure measures the amount of hydrogen gas generation potential of aluminized emulsion roof coating. There is the possibility of water reacting with aluminum pigment to generate hydrogen gas. This situation is to be avoided, so this test was designed to evaluate coating formulations and assess the propensity to gassing.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers a hydrogen gas and stability test for aluminum emulsified asphalt coatings.  
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    4 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D3019/D3019M-17(2024)(Specification)
Standard Specification for Lap Cement Used with Asphalt Roll Roofing, Non-Fibered, and Fibered

ABSTRACT
This specification covers the physical requirements and testing of three types of lap cement for use with asphalt roll roofing. Type I is a brushing consistency lap cement intended for use in the exposed-nailing method of roll roofing application, and contains no mineral or other stabilizers. This type is further divided into two grades, as follows: Grade 1, which is made with an air-blown asphalt; and Grade 2, which is made with a vacuum-reduced or steam-refined asphalt. Both Types II and III, on the other hand, are heavy brushing or light troweling consistency lap cement intended for use in the concealed-nailing method of roll roofing application, only that Type II cement contains a quantity of short-fibered asbestos, while Type III cement contains a quantity of mineral or other stabilizers, or both, but contains no asbestos. The lap cements shall be sampled for testing, and shall adhere to specified values of the following properties: water content; distillation (total distillate at given temperatures); softening point of residue; solubility in trichloroethylene; and strength at indicated age.
SCOPE
1.1 This specification covers lap cement consisting of asphalt dissolved in a volatile petroleum solvent with or without mineral or other stabilizers, or both, for use with roll roofing. The fibered version of these cements excludes the use of asbestos fibers.  
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard.  
1.3 The following precautionary caveat applies only to the test method portion, Section 6, of this specification: This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Technical specification
    2 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E831-24(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Linear Thermal Expansion of Solid Materials by Thermomechanical Analysis

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Coefficients of linear thermal expansion are used, for example, for design purposes and to determine if failure by thermal stress may occur when a solid body composed of two different materials is subjected to temperature variations.  
5.2 This test method is comparable to Test Method D3386 for testing electrical insulation materials, but it covers a more general group of solid materials and it defines test conditions more specifically. This test method uses a smaller specimen and substantially different apparatus than Test Methods E228 and D696.  
5.3 This test method may be used in research, specification acceptance, regulatory compliance, and quality assurance.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method determines the technical coefficient of linear thermal expansion of solid materials using thermomechanical analysis techniques.  
1.2 This test method is applicable to solid materials that exhibit sufficient rigidity over the test temperature range such that the sensing probe does not produce indentation of the specimen.  
1.3 The recommended lower limit of coefficient of linear thermal expansion measured with this test method is 5 μm/(m·°C). The test method may be used at lower (or negative) expansion levels with decreased accuracy and precision (see Section 12).  
1.4 This test method is applicable to the temperature range from −120 °C to 900 °C. The temperature range may be extended depending upon the instrumentation and calibration materials used.  
1.5 SI units are the standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D2699-24a(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Research Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Research O.N. correlates with commercial automotive spark-ignition engine antiknock performance under mild conditions of operation.  
5.2 Research O.N. is used by engine manufacturers, petroleum refiners and marketers, and in commerce as a primary specification measurement related to the matching of fuels and engines.  
5.2.1 Empirical correlations that permit calculation of automotive antiknock performance are based on the general equation:
Values of k1,  k2, and k3 vary with vehicles and vehicle populations and are based on road-O.N. determinations.  
5.2.2 Research O.N., in conjunction with Motor O.N., defines the antiknock index of automotive spark-ignition engine fuels, in accordance with Specification D4814. The antiknock index of a fuel approximates the Road octane ratings for many vehicles, is posted on retail dispensing pumps in the U.S., and is referred to in vehicle manuals.
This is more commonly presented as:
5.2.3 Research O.N. is also used either alone or in conjunction with other factors to define the Road O.N. capabilities of spark-ignition engine fuels for vehicles operating in areas of the world other than the United States.  
5.3 Research O.N. is used for measuring the antiknock performance of spark-ignition engine fuels that contain oxygenates.  
5.4 Research O.N. is important in relation to the specifications for spark-ignition engine fuels used in stationary and other nonautomotive engine applications.
SCOPE
1.1 This laboratory test method covers the quantitative determination of the knock rating of liquid spark-ignition engine fuel in terms of Research O.N., including fuels that contain up to 25 % v/v of ethanol. However, this test method may not be applicable to fuel and fuel components that are primarily oxygenates.2 The sample fuel is tested using a standardized single cylinder, four-stroke cycle, variable compression ratio, carbureted, CFR engine run in accordance with a defined set of operating conditions. The O.N. scale is defined by the volumetric composition of PRF blends. The sample fuel knock intensity is compared to that of one or more PRF blends. The O.N. of the PRF blend that matches the K.I. of the sample fuel establishes the Research O.N.  
1.2 The O.N. scale covers the range from 0 to 120 octane number but this test method has a working range from 40 to 120 Research O.N. Typical commercial fuels produced for spark-ignition engines rate in the 88 to 101 Research O.N. range. Testing of gasoline blend stocks or other process stream materials can produce ratings at various levels throughout the Research O.N. range.  
1.3 The values of operating conditions are stated in SI units and are considered standard. The values in parentheses are the historical inch-pound units. The standardized CFR engine measurements continue to be in inch-pound units only because of the extensive and expensive tooling that has been created for this equipment.  
1.4 For purposes of determining conformance with all specified limits in this standard, an observed value or a calculated value shall be rounded “to the nearest unit” in the last right-hand digit used in expressing the specified limit, in accordance with the rounding method of Practice E29.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific warning statements, see Section 8, 14.4.1, 15.5.1, 16.6.1, Annex A1, A2.2.3.1, A2.2.3.3 (6) and (9), A2.3.5, X3.3.7, X4.2.3.1, X4.3.4.1, X4.3.9.3, X4.3.11.4, and X4.5.1.8.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Gu...

  • Standard
    48 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    48 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D8165-24(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Load-Carrying Capacity of Lubricants Used in Hypoid Final-Drive Axles Operated under Low-Speed and High-Torque Conditions

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method measures a lubricant's ability to protect hypoid final drive axles from abrasive wear, adhesive wear, plastic deformation, and surface fatigue when subjected to low-speed, high-torque conditions. Lack of protection can lead to premature gear or bearing failure, or both.  
5.2 This test method is used, or referred to, in specifications and classifications of rear-axle gear lubricants such as:  
5.2.1 Specification D7450.  
5.2.2 American Petroleum Institute (API) Publication 1560.  
5.2.3 SAE J308.  
5.2.4 SAE J2360.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method, commonly referred to as the L-37-1 test, describes a test procedure for evaluating the load-carrying capacity, wear performance, and extreme pressure properties of a gear lubricant in a hypoid axle under conditions of low-speed, high-torque operation.3  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.2.1 Exceptions—Where there is no direct SI equivalent such as National Pipe threads/diameters, tubing size, or where there is a sole source supply equipment specification.
1.2.1.1 The drawing in Annex A6 is in inch-pound units.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific warning statements are provided in 7.2 and 10.1.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    18 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    18 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off