Occupational health and safety management - Guidelines on performance evaluation

Titre manque

Sistem vodenja varnosti in zdravja pri delu - Smernice za ocenjevanje uspešnosti

General Information

Status
Not Published
Public Enquiry End Date
29-Jun-2023
Current Stage
4020 - Public enquire (PE) (Adopted Project)
Start Date
31-Mar-2023
Due Date
18-Aug-2023

Buy Standard

Draft
ISO/DIS 45004:2023
English language
28 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023
01-junij-2023
Sistem vodenja varnosti in zdravja pri delu - Smernice za ocenjevanje uspešnosti
Occupational health and safety management - Guidelines on performance evaluation
Titre manque
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: ISO/DIS 45004
ICS:
13.100 Varnost pri delu. Industrijska Occupational safety.
higiena Industrial hygiene
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023 en
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023
DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
ISO/DIS 45004
ISO/TC 283 Secretariat: BSI
Voting begins on: Voting terminates on:
2023-02-09 2023-05-04
Occupational health and safety management — Guidelines
on performance evaluation
ICS: 13.100
THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT CIRCULATED
FOR COMMENT AND APPROVAL. IT IS
THEREFORE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND MAY
This document is circulated as received from the committee secretariat.
NOT BE REFERRED TO AS AN INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD UNTIL PUBLISHED AS SUCH.
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL,
TECHNOLOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND
USER PURPOSES, DRAFT INTERNATIONAL
STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE TO
BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR
POTENTIAL TO BECOME STANDARDS TO
WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN
Reference number
NATIONAL REGULATIONS.
ISO/DIS 45004:2023(E)
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED
TO SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS,
NOTIFICATION OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT
RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE AND TO
PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. © ISO 2023

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023
ISO/DIS 45004:2023(E)
DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
ISO/DIS 45004
ISO/TC 283 Secretariat: BSI
Voting begins on: Voting terminates on:

Occupational health and safety management — Guidelines
on performance evaluation
ICS: 13.100
COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT
THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT CIRCULATED
FOR COMMENT AND APPROVAL. IT IS
© ISO 2023
THEREFORE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND MAY
This document is circulated as received from the committee secretariat.
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
NOT BE REFERRED TO AS AN INTERNATIONAL
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on STANDARD UNTIL PUBLISHED AS SUCH.
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester. BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL,
TECHNOLOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND
ISO copyright office
USER PURPOSES, DRAFT INTERNATIONAL
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE TO
BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
POTENTIAL TO BECOME STANDARDS TO
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN
Reference number
Email: copyright@iso.org
NATIONAL REGULATIONS.
Website: www.iso.org ISO/DIS 45004:2022(E)
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED
Published in Switzerland
TO SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS,
NOTIFICATION OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT
RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE AND TO
ii
  © ISO 2023 – All rights reserved
PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. © ISO 2022

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023
ISO/DIS 45004:2022(E)
Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Performance evaluation .2
4.1 What performance evaluation is . 2
4.2 Why performance evaluation is important . 2
5 The performance evaluation process . 2
5.1 General . 2
5.2 Elements of performance evaluation . 3
5.3 Performance evaluation processes, sources of information and tools . 3
5.3.1 General . 3
5.3.2 Inspections . 3
5.3.3 Interviews . 4
5.3.4 Surveys . 4
5.3.5 Pre-activity and post-activity reviews . 4
5.3.6 Exposure assessments and occupational health surveillance . 5
5.3.7 Health and safety meetings . 5
5.3.8 Focus groups . 5
5.3.9 Injury and illness tracking . 6
5.3.10 Incident investigations . . . 6
5.3.11 Internal audits . 6
5.3.12 Management review . 6
6 Performance indicators. 7
6.1 Overview . 7
6.2 Selection of performance indicators . 7
6.3 Key characteristics of indicators . 7
6.4 Types of indicators . 9
7 Integration of OH&S performance evaluation into business processes .12
7.1 General .12
7.2 Potential unintended consequences .12
7.3 The value and limitations of benchmarking . 13
8 Monitor, measure, analyse, and evaluate .14
8.1 General . 14
8.2 Monitor and measure . 14
8.3 Analyse . 14
8.4 Uncertainty . 15
8.5 Evaluate . 15
9 Communicate .15
10 Act on results .16
11 Review performance evaluation processes .17
Annex A Performance evaluation examples .18
Bibliography .23
iii
© ISO 2022 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023
ISO/DIS 45004:2022(E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to
the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see
www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 283 Occupational health and safety
management. This is the first edition of this document.
A list of all parts in the ISO 45001 series can be found on the ISO website.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.
iv
  © ISO 2022 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023
ISO/DIS 45004:2022(E)
Introduction
This document is intended to help organizations to effectively monitor, measure, analyse and evaluate
occupational health and safety (OH&S) performance.
OH&S performance evaluation includes the processes that the organization chooses to assess the
adequacy of activities that are expected to achieve OH&S intended results. OH&S performance is
normally evaluated by using a combination of processes and sources of information such as incident
investigation, inspections, audits, qualitative and quantitative indicators, culture surveys and
interviews.
This document provides guidance on performance evaluation processes, including:
— selection and use of performance indicators;
— monitoring, measuring, analysing and evaluating data;
— unintended consequences;
— limitations, such as under-reporting over-reporting and data distortion.
This document can be used by organizations of all types, regardless of whether they have implemented
a formal OH&S management system.
This document provides examples which demonstrate how to evaluate performance to drive
improvements and create safer and healthier workplaces, better protect workers, and support the
organization in achieving its intended results.
This document recommends a balanced approach based on selection of performance evaluation
processes and indicators, with emphasis on proactive (leading) OH&S performance indicators. It
recognizes that over-emphasis on past performance (lagging) indicators, such as incidence and
frequency rates, can undermine efforts to improve OH&S performance.
As every organization is unique, and OH&S intended results vary, there is not a standardized set of
performance evaluation processes or set of indicators that fulfil the needs of all organizations.
Therefore, every organization has to identify performance evaluation processes and indicators to suit
its needs.
Effective performance evaluation can help the organization to achieve continual improvement,
but the way it is carried out can also produce unintended consequences. The most common of these
consequences are discussed in this document.
This document is designed to complement ISO 45001 by providing performance evaluation approaches
that align with requirements of that standard. This document can be used independently, by any
organization, to improve OH&S performance.
v
© ISO 2022 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023
DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/DIS 45004:2022(E)
Occupational health and safety management — Guidelines
on performance evaluation
1 Scope
This document provides guidance on how to assess occupational health and safety (OH&S) performance,
through the selection and use of performance evaluation processes and indicators, and by monitoring,
measuring, analysing, and evaluating the data obtained. It enables organizations to determine if
intended results are being achieved, including continual improvement of OH&S performance.
This document is applicable to all organizations regardless of type, industry sector, level of risk, size, or
location. It can be used independently or as part of OH&S management systems, including those based
on ISO 45001:2018, or other standards or guidelines.
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 45001:2018 and the following
apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1
measurement
process to determine a value
Note 1 to entry: measurement can relate to managing activities, processes, products, services, systems or
organizations.
[SOURCE: ISO 45001:2018, 3.31, modified: Note 1 deleted. New note 1 added]
3.2
indicator
variable that can be measured or described, representing the status or a characteristic of operations,
processes, management, and conditions or outcomes
Note 1 to entry: indicators are generally measurable and can be quantitative or qualitative.
Note 2 to entry: lagging indicators relate to past performance.
Note 3 to entry: leading indicators relate to factors that can influence performance.
Note 4 to entry: some organizations use the term “metric” instead of “indicator”.
Note 5 to entry: significant indicators used to direct decision making by top management are sometimes referred
to as a key performance indicators (KPIs).
1
© ISO 2022 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023
ISO/DIS 45004:2022(E)
4 Performance evaluation
4.1 What performance evaluation is
Performance evaluation is a process or set of processes that compares performance achieved against
OH&S intended results and is achieved through a process or set of processes. The organization’s
intended results can include continual improvement of OH&S performance, achievement of OH&S
objectives, and fulfilment of legal requirements and other requirements.
The organization should take into account that there are many sources of information that can provide
input to performance evaluation (see 5.3). The organization should consider using a variety of sources
of information as inputs to achieve a more comprehensive assessment, as a single source used in
isolation can lead to an incomplete or inaccurate assessment.
4.2 Why performance evaluation is important
— The intent of performance evaluation is to assist the organization in determining the extent to
which intended results are being achieved.
Performance evaluation allows the organization to determine, for example:
a) which processes are achieving planned results and which are not;
b) the degree of variation in processes or activities that affect OH&S performance and the causes of
those variations;
c) if there is a need for actions to improve processes;
d) if top management is demonstrating support for OH&S.
Performance evaluation is essential to ensure that OH&S is being effectively managed and to inform
decision-making.
5 The performance evaluation process
5.1 General
When implementing the performance evaluation process, the organization should take into account:
a) its key processes, relevant to its context (e.g. working at height, permit to work, exposure
assessment);
b) the effectiveness of OH&S management, including hazard identification, assessment of risk and the
effectiveness of risk controls;
c) its conscious or unconscious assumptions about OH&S that influence organizational behaviour (e.g.
incidents are always caused by unsafe behaviour by workers or a low incident rate always means
the workplace is safe);
d) organizational culture that influences behaviours that affect OH&S (e.g. reporting OH&S incidents
or issues is encouraged and supported, without risk of reprisal);
e) interdependencies within the system (e.g. the effectiveness of inspections depend on time available,
training of inspectors and the willingness of workers to report issues to inspectors);
f) processes within the individual elements of the management system that can impact OH&S
performance.
NOTE 1 Examples of processes that can impact OH&S performance are provided in Annex A.
2
  © ISO 2022 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023
ISO/DIS 45004:2022(E)
5.2 Elements of performance evaluation
The organization should:
a) determine the OH&S intended results;
b) determine what should be done to achieve the intended results;
c) choose the performance evaluation processes, sources of information and tools (5.3);
d) determine the information needed and whether it is possible to obtain it;
e) measure, monitor, analyse and evaluate performance (Clause 8);
f) take action based on evaluation of performance (8.7);
g) review unintended consequences (see 7.1);
h) take action to address issues identified through the review of the performance evaluation process
and results (see 11).
The organization should undertake specific performance evaluation processes to determine if the
intended results are being achieved. The organization should take into account the types of activities
being undertaken when considering the frequency and nature of performance evaluation processes.
For example, if the organization undertakes high-risk work it can monitor, measure and evaluate
activities before, during and after the job, to gain information on performance at each stage of activity.
If the organization undertakes lower-risk work or has processes that are unlikely to vary to a great
degree, the monitoring can be less frequent.
5.3 Performance evaluation processes, sources of information and tools
5.3.1 General
The organization should determine the most effective performance evaluation processes and sources
of information and tools in order to evaluate if intended results are being achieved. The organization
should select indicators based on sources of information such as those described (see 5.3.2 to 5.3.12
inclusive). The organization should consider indicators based on OH&S process inputs such as training,
risk assessments, contractor safety and management of change, or information gained from incidents
such as near misses, overexposure to airborne contaminants, injuries, chemical spills or illnesses.
Further information on the selection and use of indicators is provided in Clause 6.
The list of performance evaluation processes in Clauses 5.3.2 to 5.3.12 contains many of the most
common processes, however this list is not exhaustive. The organization should use additional
processes appropriate to the nature of work, type of OH&S hazards and exposures, and level of risk.
5.3.2 Inspections
The organization can use inspections to, for example:
a) observe how work is actually being done;
b) gain both general and specific information (e.g. work conditions; if workers are using controls as
intended; compliance with legal requirements);
c) gain information on more than one aspect of OH&S performance at one time (e.g. correct use of
PPE; operation of ventilation systems and other controls; how workers interact and collaborate;
safe use of machinery or equipment; opportunities for improvement)
d) gain insight into hazards and risks and why near misses or incidents happen;
3
© ISO 2022 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023
ISO/DIS 45004:2022(E)
e) review documented information related to work processes (e.g. breakdowns, product or service
defects.
The organization should consider if it is useful to implement regular inspections for specific OH&S
objectives (e.g. daily checks of safety-critical equipment such as cranes, ventilation, chemical enclosures
or safety devices on power presses).
5.3.3 Interviews
The organization should consider the use of formal and informal interviews with workers at all levels
to gather information on hazards, the effectiveness of controls, adverse health symptoms, recent
experiences, how workers are feeling, their concerns, and ideas for improvement. The organization
should provide interviewers with appropriate training and tools.
The organization should take into account:
a) the importance of creating an environment where workers feel safe to answer, without fear of
adverse consequence (e.g. embarrassment, threats, stigma, any type of reprisal);
b) potential benefits of confidential one-to-one or small group discussions to encourage open and
honest discussion;
c) the need for interviewers to mainly ask open rather than closed questions to encourage the
interviewee to share all relevant information;
d) the need for interviewers to ask non-judgemental questions without bias or directing answers to a
pre-determined conclusion;
e) the importance of listening and documenting answers (if needed), accurately and objectively.
5.3.4 Surveys
The organization should consider using surveys to gain insight on aspects such as organizational
culture, evaluation of performance related to internal and external issues, needs of interested parties,
work environment, health and wellbeing, or how effective processes and controls are perceived to be.
Surveys can be performed at different levels of the organization and with relevant interested parties,
depending on the subject of the survey. The organization should consider the use of anonymous
surveys, when appropriate, for example for potentially sensitive issues, such as the work environment,
psychological health and safety, effective leadership or potentially unsafe working practices.
NOTE Surveys can be helpful to clarify if concerns are limited to a small number of workers or more general.
5.3.5 Pre-activity and post-activity reviews
Pre-activity reviews (sometimes referred to as pre-job or pre-task reviews or dynamic risk assessments)
and post-activity reviews (sometimes called post-job debriefs or after-action reviews) can be a rich
source of performance evaluation information. The organization should consider the use of pre- and
post-activity reviews, to gain information on aspects such as:
a) resource issues, including the need for more workers or workers with different skills, equipment
repair, availability and condition of safety-critical items such as ventilation systems, air quality
monitoring and machine guards;
b) competence gaps and the potential need for training;
c) gaps in legal compliance;
d) current working conditions;
e) effectiveness of hazard identification and assessment of risks, and identification of opportunities;
4
  © ISO 2022 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
oSIST ISO/DIS 45004:2023
ISO/DIS 45004:2022(E)
f) effectiveness of existing controls, procedures, and processes.
The organization should ensure workers involved in the task participate in pre-activity and post-
activity reviews to ensure information is comprehensive and accurate and that workers are involved in
determining necessary actions to be taken.
5.3.6 Exposure assessments and occupational health surveillance
The organization should use information from exposure assessment monitoring and health surveillance
programmes to help evaluate the effectiveness of processes and controls (e.g. ventilation, hearing
protection) and determine the level of exposure before harm to workers occurs. The organization
should compare exposures against established occupational exposure limits and determine if levels are
exceeded. The organization should use health surveillance programmes to identify signs or symptoms
of ill health.
To understand OH&S performance the organization should measure and monitor exposure to health
hazards, such as.
— chemical (e.g. liquids, gases and other airborne contaminants);
— biological (e.g. toxins, viruses, bacteria, fungi, animal bites);
— physical (e.g. excessive heat, radiation and vibration);
— psychological (e.g. work overload, bullying, stress);
— ergonomic (e.g. repetitive movement, poor posture, manual handling).
The organization should take into account that it can take months or years before negative effects
of exposure result in symptoms
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.