SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
(Main)Space engineering - Testing guidelines
Space engineering - Testing guidelines
This handbook provides additional information for the application of the Testing standard EN 16603-10-03.
This handbook will be the guideline for all space projects, related equipment and complete systems, by providing background information that aids the reader to better understand and meet the requirements of the standard.
The document would follow the flow of the Testing standard and in particular w hatever is excluded from the testing standard (see Scope of EN 16603-10-03) should also be excluded.
NOTE: EN 16603-10-03:2014 will be in parallel also updated to take into account the new TR.
Raumfahrttechnik - Prüfrichtlinien
Ingénierie spatiale - Lignes directrices pour les essais
Vesoljska tehnika - Smernice za preskušanje
Ta priročnik vsebuje dodatne informacije za uporabo standarda za preskušanje EN 16603-10-03.
Uporabljal se bo kot smernica za vse vesoljske projekte, povezano opremo in celovite sisteme, saj zagotavlja osnovne informacije, ki bodo bralcu pomagale bolje razumeti in izpolnjevati zahteve standarda.
Ta dokument bi moral slediti strukturi standarda za preskušanje, zlasti pa je iz njega priporočljivo izključiti vse, kar je izključeno tudi iz standarda za preskušanje (glej področje uporabe standarda EN 16603-10-03).
OPOMBA: Standard EN 16603-10-03:2014 se bo tudi sproti posodabljal tako, da bo v njem upoštevano novo tehnično poročilo (TR).
General Information
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
01-oktober-2022
Vesoljska tehnika - Smernice za preskušanje
Space engineering - Testing guidelines
Raumfahrttechnik - Prüfrichtlinien
Ingénierie spatiale - Lignes directrices pour les essais
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
ICS:
49.140 Vesoljski sistemi in operacije Space systems and
operations
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022 en,fr,de
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03
TECHNICAL REPORT
RAPPORT TECHNIQUE
TECHNISCHER REPORT August 2022
ICS 49.140
English version
Space engineering - Testing guidelines
Ingénierie spatiale - Lignes directrices pour les essais Raumfahrttechnik - Prüfrichtlinien
This Technical Report was approved by CEN on 16 August 2021. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/CLC/JTC
5.
CEN and CENELEC members are the national standards bodies and national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium,
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy,
Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia,
Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and United Kingdom.
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre:
Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2022 CEN/CENELEC All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means Ref. No. CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022 E
reserved worldwide for CEN national Members and for
CENELEC Members.
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
Table of contents
European Foreword . 10
Introduction . 11
1 Scope . 12
2 References . 13
3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms . 15
3.1 Terms from other documents . 15
3.2 Terms specific to the present document . 15
3.2.1 dummy . 15
3.3 Abbreviated terms. 16
4 General requirements. 21
4.1 Test programme . 21
4.1.1 Test programme basics . 21
4.1.2 Specific tests . 23
4.1.3 Risks during testing . 23
4.1.4 Overtesting . 24
4.1.5 Test effectiveness . 25
4.2 Development test prior to qualification . 25
4.3 Test management . 26
4.3.1 General . 26
4.3.2 Test reviews . 27
4.3.3 Test documentation . 29
4.3.4 Anomaly or failure during testing . 40
4.3.5 Test data . 40
4.4 Test conditions, input tolerances, and measurement uncertainties . 41
4.4.1 Test conditions . 41
4.4.2 Test input tolerances . 42
4.4.3 Measurement uncertainties . 42
4.5 Test objectives . 45
4.5.1 General requirements . 45
2
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
4.5.2 Qualification testing . 45
4.5.3 Acceptance testing . 45
4.5.4 Protoflight testing . 46
4.6 Retesting . 46
4.6.1 Overview . 46
4.6.2 Implementation of a design modification after completion of
qualification . 46
4.6.3 Storage after protoflight or acceptance testing . 46
4.6.4 Space segment element or equipment to be re-flown . 46
4.6.5 Flight use of qualification Space segment element or equipment . 47
5 Space segment equipment test requirements . 48
5.1 General requirements . 48
5.2 Qualification tests requirements . 49
5.3 Acceptance test requirements . 49
5.4 Protoflight test requirements . 49
5.5 Space segment equipment test programme implementation requirements . 50
5.5.1 General tests . 50
5.5.2 Mechanical tests . 53
5.5.3 Structural integrity under pressure tests . 56
5.5.4 Thermal tests . 57
5.5.5 Electrical/RF tests . 87
5.5.6 Mission specific test . 88
6 Space segment element test requirements . 89
6.1 General requirements . 89
6.2 Qualification tests requirements . 89
6.3 Acceptance test requirements . 90
6.4 Protoflight test requirements . 90
6.5 Space segment element test programme implementation requirements . 90
6.5.1 General tests . 90
6.5.2 Mechanical tests . 113
6.5.3 Structural integrity under pressure tests . 117
6.5.4 Thermal test . 117
6.5.5 Electromagnetic test . 134
6.5.6 Mission specific tests . 135
6.5.7 Crewed mission specific tests . 135
7 Pre-launch testing . 137
3
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
Annex A Mechanical tests . 138
A.1 Foreword . 138
A.2 Physical properties measurements . 138
A.3 Static Test . 143
A.4 Spin test . 156
A.5 Centrifuge test . 159
A.6 Sine burst test . 161
A.7 Sinusoidal vibration test . 165
A.8 Random vibration testing . 177
A.9 Acoustic testing . 182
A.10 Shock testing . 188
A.11 Thermal distortion test . 188
A.12 Gravity release test . 193
A.13 Micro-vibration environment verification by test . 194
Annex B Structural integrity under pressure tests . 212
B.1 Foreword . 212
B.2 Leak test . 214
B.3 Proof pressure test . 220
B.4 Pressure cycling test . 221
B.5 Design burst pressure test . 223
B.6 Burst test . 224
Annex C Audible noise test . 226
C.1 Space segment equipment audible noise emission test . 226
C.2 Space segment element audible noise emission test . 230
Annex D PIM tests . 234
D.1 PIM – guidelines for equipment testing . 234
D.2 PIM – guidelines for payload testing . 240
D.3 PIM – Guidelines for Element testing . 247
Annex E Alignment measurements . 251
E.1 Purpose . 251
E.2 General . 251
E.3 Test configuration and test aspects . 254
E.4 Test preparation . 259
E.5 Test execution . 260
E.6 Test evaluation . 264
E.7 Other alignment methodology . 264
4
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
Annex F List of test bench names . 265
Annex G Referenced documents . 267
Figures
Figure 4-1: Testing at S/C level and example of typical EGSE setup for JUICE S/C
(courtesy Airbus Defence and Space) . 31
Figure 4-2: GOCE spacecraft Container . 33
Figure 4-3: Exomars Schiaparelli Descent Module Container . 34
Figure 4-4: AEOLUS multipurpose trolley . 34
Figure 4-5: Lifting device for Exomars Schiaparelli Descent module. 35
Figure 4-6: Test input in-tolerance or out-of-tolerance assessment (decision rule) . 43
Figure 4-7: Conformity assessment with the guard bands approach (decision rule) . 44
Figure 5-1: Relation between FFT, PT and RFT on equipment level . 50
Figure 5-2: Unit TRP and Boundary Temperatures (conductive ITP and T ) . 60
Sink
Figure 5-3: Thermal vacuum test profile (example n° 1 for "type a" units) . 66
Figure 5-4: Thermal vacuum test profile (example n° 2 for "type a" units) . 66
Figure 5-5: Hot plateau TRP temperatures drive (including "type a" units switch-on) . 70
Figure 5-6: Cold plateau TRP temperatures drive (including "type a" units switch-on) . 71
Figure 5-7: Unit temperature cycling mechanical and thermal configuration . 74
Figure 5-8: Some common examples of equipment flight accomodation . 77
Figure 5-9: Temperature controlled support and test set-up representativeness . 80
Figure 6-1: Mapping of previous and current test terms in the ECSS-E-ST-10-03
standard . 92
Figure 6-2: Typical sequence of tests for element level functional verification . 96
Figure 6-3: Logical relationship between FFT-D (or FFT-Q), FFT-W(or FFT-A) and RFT
. 99
Figure 6-4: Logical relation between model, test bench, test campaign, test item (IUT),
test environment and test infrastructure . 102
Figure 6-5: Example of an SVF based on the mapping between ECSS-E-ST-10-
02C/03C and ECSS-E-TM-10-21A . 103
Figure 6-6: Example of solar generator unloading device for Sentinel 2 . 106
Figure 6-7: Exomars TGO antenna offloading device . 106
Figure 6-8: Top-level AOCS Control Chain Schematic . 110
Figure 6-9: Fit check of Galileo Spacecraft with the launch dispenser . 113
Figure 6-10: Example of a thermal vacuum test profile for a space segment element 121
Figure 6-11: Unit TRP temperature control bands during space segment element
plateaux . 123
Figure 6-12: Unit TRP temperatures drive feasibility (example of a P/F equipment bay)
. 125
5
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
Figure A-1 : CoG measurement along 1st lateral axis . 139
Figure A-2 : CoG measurement along 2nd lateral axis . 140
Figure A-3 : CoG measurement along vertical axis . 140
Figure A-4 : M80 physical properties measurement machine with Bepi-Colombo MCS
at ESTEC . 141
Figure A-5 : WM50/6 combined CoG and MoI measurement machine with IXV STM 142
Figure A-6 : WM50/6 combined CoG and MoI measurement machine with Goce PFM
. 142
Figure A-7 : Rack static test configuration-1/4 . 146
Figure A-8 : Rack Static tests configuration-2/4 . 146
Figure A-9 : Rack Static tests configuration-3/4 . 147
Figure A-10 : Rack Static tests configuration-4/4 . 147
Figure A-11 : Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) primary structure test article . 149
Figure A-12 : Setting of ATV primary structure static test . 150
Figure A-13 : ATV static test fixtures: “Base” to constrain the test article and “Tower” to
support the internal jacks . 151
Figure A-14 : ATV static test: internal loading jacks arrangement . 152
Figure A-15 : ATV static test: internal loading jacks details . 153
Figure A-16 : ATV static test: external view and external loading jacks . 154
Figure A-17 : ATV static test: layout of the displacement transducers . 155
Figure A-18 : Dynamic balancing facility installed in a vacuum chamber (Large Space
Simulator at ESTEC) . 157
Figure A-19 : Meteosat Flight Model during spin test . 157
Figure A-20 : GPM spacecraft undertakes centrifuge test at Goddard (courtesy of
NASA) . 160
Figure A-21 : Centrifuge test of ExoMars Descent Module (courtesy of Lavoshkin) . 160
Figure A-22 : Example of Sine Burst with a frequency of 15 Hz and 6 cycles at
maximum load of 12g (figure taken from NESC Technical Bulletin 15-02)
. 163
Figure A-23 : Example of primary and secondary notching . 171
Figure A-24 : Typical Sine excitation at spacecraft base . 176
Figure A-25 : Example of test sequence for random vibration. 181
Figure A-26 : Typical full level random specification . 181
Figure A-27 : Rosetta in the ESTEC Large Acoustic Facility . 184
Figure A-28 -Antenna reflector acoustic test in ESTEC acoustic facility . 184
Figure A-29 : ATV STM-B Solar array wing in IABG reverberant chamber (Courtesy
Dutch Space) . 186
Figure A-30 : Typical acoustic noise specification . 187
Figure A-31 : LISA Pathfinder Science Module structure on kinematic support for
thermal distortion test . 188
6
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
Figure A-32 : Typical temperature profile for thermal distortion test . 189
Figure A-33 : Illustration of different courses of laser beams for LISA Pathfinder
Science Module thermal distortion test . 190
Figure A-34 : Videogrammetry measurements during LISA Pathfinder Science Module
thermal distortion test . 191
Figure A-35 : Overview of camera positions used during LISA Pathfinder Science
Module thermal distortion test to generate the images of the test article . 191
Figure A-36 : Displacement of targets mounted on LPF SCM external structure for a
temperature variation from +9,5°C (reference temperature) to +40,5°C . 192
Figure A-37 : NIRSpec engineering test unit (ETU) during gravity-release test
(courtesy: EADS Astrium) . 194
Figure A-38 Principle of measurement of the micro-vibration generated by an
equipment . 195
Figure A-39 : ESA reaction wheel characterisation facility in room conditions and in with
vacuum bell (mN range frequency band up to 1 kHz ) . 196
Figure A-40 : Micro-vibration measurement test, indirect force characterisation . 198
Figure A-41 : Example of test instrumentation for micro-vibration test at equipment level
using indirect method measurement . 199
Figure A-42 : View of test instrumentation during Water Pump Assembly (WPA) micro-
vibration test at equipment level using indirect method measurement . 199
Figure A-43 : Test setup for a test of equipment susceptibility to microvibrations . 202
Figure A-44 : Micro-vibration measurement system of ESA ESTEC allows 6 Dof
excitation and 6 Dof measurement . 202
Figure A-45 : Example of configuration used for the microvibration test on MTG, by
using small shakers (grey) to introduce well defined excitations on a mass
dummy of a reaction wheel. 204
Figure A-46 : Example of configurations used for the microvibration test on MTG, by
using small shakers (grey) to introduce well defined excitations on a mass
dummy of a reaction wheel. Force (left), and moments (centre and right)
. 205
Figure A-47 : SPOT4 satellite micro-vibration test . 207
Figure A-48 : Typical background noise acceleration PSD . 208
Figure A-49 : VVIS acceptance test time history red top surface blue – bottom input 210
Figure A-50 : ESA micro-vibration universal reference excitation unit (0,05 Hz to 10Hz,
10 μN to 5 N, 10 µNm to 1,5 Nm) . 210
Figure A-51 : Typical table for microvibration emission measurement (mN range limited
frequency bandwidth) . 211
Figure B-1 : Sketch of the Vacuum chamber method . 215
Figure B-2 : Accumulation Leak Test set up . 216
Figure B-3 : Enclosure Calibration . 216
Figure B-4 : Cupola Accumulation leak test overview . 216
Figure B-5 : Cupola Accumulation Leak Test He capillary leak source . 217
Figure B-6 : Node 2 accumulation leak test on a joint _typical set-up . 217
7
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
Figure C-1 : View of Water Pump Assembly (WPA) test article during audible noise test
at equipment level . 227
Figure C-2 : Example of test instrumentation plan for audible noise test at equipment
level . 227
Figure C-3 : View of test instrumentation during Water Pump Assembly (WPA) audible
noise test at equipment level . 228
Figure C-4 : View of COLUMBUS test article (external view: seen from deck-aft
perspective) during audible noise test at element level . 230
Figure C-5 : Illustration of different microphone position inside COLUMBUS during
audible noise test at element level. 231
Figure C-6 : Picture of COLUMBUS internal microphones during audible noise test at
element level . 232
Figure D-1 : Sketch from a typical Conducted PIM test bed . 235
Figure D-2 : Radiated PIM test bed: each carrier is transmitted via a dedicated antenna
. 235
Figure D-3 : Radiated PIM test bed: both carriers are transmitted by the same antenna
. 236
Figure D-4 : Radiated PIM test bed: both carriers are transmitted via the same antenna
. 236
Figure D-5 : Typical RF power profile for PIM tests: transmission carriers. . 238
Figure D-6 : Typical element (payload) inside an anechoic chamber for validation tests
under nominal scenario. . 240
Figure D-7 : Test bed placed to radiate the anechoic chamber walls according to
payload disposition. . 242
Figure D-8 : Radiated PIM test bed: each carrier is transmitted via a dedicated antenna
. 242
Figure D-9 : Radiated PIM test bed: both carriers are transmitted by the same antenna
. 243
Figure D-10 : Radiated PIM test bed: both carriers are transmitted via the same
antenna . 243
Figure D-11 : Typical RF power profile for PIM tests: transmission carriers. . 245
Figure E-1 Coordinate Systems relationship . 252
Figure E-2 : General sketch of a laser tracker . 255
Figure E-3 : Typical setup for alignment using laser tracker . 256
Figure E-4 : Laser tracker axis and laser beam . 256
Figure E-5 : Theodolites main components . 258
Figure E-6 : Typical Theodolites . 258
Figure E-7 : Measurement setup with theodolites . 260
Figure E-8 : Laser Tracker environment creation . 262
Figure E-9 : Laser tracker (Aligned to MBS) measuring theodolite line of sight . 263
Figure E-10 : Corner Cube Reflector . 263
8
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
SIST-TP CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
CEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2022
Tables
Table 4-1: Typical EGSE/SCOE list . 32
Table 5-1: Nomenclature for temperature cycling implementation on "type a" units . 65
Table 5-2: Thermal vacuum step by step procedure (example n° 1 for "type a" units) . 67
Table 5-3: Thermal vacuum step by step procedure (example n° 2 for "type a" units) . 68
Table 6-1: List of typical Space segment element models on which functional tests are
executed (Verification Level: Space segment el
...
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
kSIST-TP FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021
01-julij-2021
Vesoljska tehnika - Smernice za preskušanje
Space engineering - Testing guidelines
Raumfahrttechnik - Prüfrichtlinien
Ingénierie spatiale - Lignes directrices pour les essais
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03
ICS:
49.140 Vesoljski sistemi in operacije Space systems and
operations
kSIST-TP FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10- en,fr,de
03:2021
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021
TECHNICAL REPORT
FINAL DRAFT
FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-
RAPPORT TECHNIQUE
10-03
TECHNISCHER BERICHT
April 2021
ICS 49.140
English version
Space engineering - Testing guidelines
Ingénierie spatiale - Lignes directrices pour les essais Raumfahrttechnik - Prüfrichtlinien
This draft Technical Report is submitted to CEN members for Vote. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee
CEN/CLC/JTC 5.
CEN and CENELEC members are the national standards bodies and national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium,
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy,
Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia,
Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom.
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are
aware and to provide supporting documentation.
Warning : This document is not a Technical Report. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without
notice and shall not be referred to as a Technical Report.
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre:
Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2021 CEN/CENELEC All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means Ref. No. FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021 E
reserved worldwide for CEN national Members and for
CENELEC Members.
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021
FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021 (E)
Table of contents
European Foreword . 15
Introduction . 16
1 Scope . 17
2 References . 18
3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms . 20
3.1 Terms from other documents . 20
3.2 Terms specific to the present document . 20
3.3 Abbreviated terms. 20
4 General requirements. 26
4.1 Test programme . 26
4.1.1 Test programme basics . 26
4.1.2 Specific tests . 28
4.1.3 Risks during testing . 28
4.1.4 Overtesting . 29
4.1.5 Test effectiveness . 30
4.2 Development test prior to qualification . 30
4.3 Test management . 31
4.3.1 General . 31
4.3.2 Test reviews . 32
4.3.2.1 Test programme . 32
4.3.2.2 Test readiness review (TRR) . 32
4.3.2.3 Post test review (PTR) . 32
4.3.2.4 Test review board (TRB) . 33
4.3.3 Test documentation . 33
4.3.3.1 General . 33
4.3.3.2 Assembly, integration and test plan . 33
4.3.3.3 Test specification (TSPE) . 40
4.3.3.4 Test procedure (TPRO) . 42
4.3.3.5 Test report (TRPT) . 42
4.3.4 Anomaly or failure during testing . 43
4.3.5 Test data . 43
4.4 Test conditions, input tolerances, and measurement uncertainties . 43
2
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021
FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021 (E)
4.4.1 Test conditions . 43
4.4.2 Test input tolerances . 45
4.4.3 Measurements uncertainties . 45
4.5 Test objectives . 47
4.5.1 General requirements . 47
4.5.2 Qualification testing . 48
4.5.3 Acceptance testing . 48
4.5.4 Protoflight testing . 48
4.5.4.1 Overview. 48
4.5.4.2 Requirements . 48
4.6 Retesting . 49
4.6.1 Overview . 49
4.6.2 Implementation of a design modification after completion of
qualification . 49
4.6.3 Storage after protoflight or acceptance testing . 49
4.6.4 Space segment element or equipment to be re-flown . 49
4.6.5 Flight use of qualification Space segment element or equipment . 49
5 Space segment equipment test requirements . 50
5.1 General requirements . 50
5.2 Qualification tests requirements . 51
5.3 Acceptance test requirements . 51
5.4 Protoflight test requirements . 51
5.5 Space segment equipment test programme implementation requirements . 51
5.5.1 General tests . 51
5.5.1.1 Functional and performance tests . 51
5.5.1.2 Humidity test . 53
5.5.1.3 Life test . 53
5.5.1.4 Burn-in test . 54
5.5.2 Mechanical tests . 54
5.5.2.1 Physical properties measurements . 54
5.5.2.2 Acceleration test (static, spin or sine burst) . 55
5.5.2.3 Random vibration test . 56
5.5.2.4 Acoustic test . 56
5.5.2.5 Sinusoidal vibration test . 56
5.5.2.6 Shock test . 57
5.5.2.7 Micro-vibration generated environment test . 57
5.5.2.8 Micro-vibration susceptibility test . 57
5.5.3 Structural integrity tests . 57
5.5.3.1 Leak test . 57
5.5.3.2 Proof pressure test . 57
5.5.3.3 Pressure cycling test . 58
5.5.3.4 Design burst pressure test . 58
5.5.3.5 Burst test . 58
5.5.4 Thermal tests . 58
3
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021
FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021 (E)
5.5.4.1 Guidelines to thermal vacuum test and to thermal ambient test at
mission pressure . 60
5.5.4.2 Guidelines to thermal vacuum test . 84
5.5.4.3 Guidelines to thermal ambient test at mission pressure . 85
5.5.4.4 Alternative thermal approaches . 85
5.5.5 Electrical/RF tests . 88
5.5.5.1 EMC Test. 88
5.5.5.2 Magnetic test . 88
5.5.5.3 ESD Test . 88
5.5.5.4 Passive intermodulation test . 89
5.5.5.5 Multipactor test . 89
5.5.5.6 Corona and arc discharge test . 89
5.5.6 Mission specific test . 89
5.5.6.1 Audible noise test . 89
6 Space segment element test requirements . 90
6.1 General requirements . 90
6.2 Qualification tests requirements . 90
6.3 Acceptance test requirements . 91
6.4 Protoflight test requirements . 91
6.5 Space segment element test programme implementation requirements . 91
6.5.1 General tests . 91
6.5.1.1 Optical alignment measurement . 91
6.5.1.2 Functional tests . 91
6.5.1.3 Performance test . 108
6.5.1.4 Mission test . 109
6.5.1.5 Polarity test . 110
6.5.1.6 Launcher interface test . 112
6.5.2 Mechanical tests . 113
6.5.2.1 Physical properties measurements . 113
6.5.2.2 Modal survey test . 114
6.5.2.3 Static load test . 114
6.5.2.4 Spin Test . 114
6.5.2.5 Transient test . 114
6.5.2.6 Acoustic test . 115
6.5.2.7 Random vibration test . 115
6.5.2.8 Sinusoidal vibration test . 116
6.5.2.9 Shock test . 116
6.5.2.10 Micro-vibration susceptibility test . 117
6.5.3 Structural integrity tests . 117
6.5.3.1 Proof pressure test . 117
6.5.3.2 Pressure cycling test . 117
6.5.3.3 Design burst pressure test . 117
6.5.3.4 Leak test . 117
6.5.4 Thermal test . 118
6.5.4.1 Guidelines to thermal vacuum test and to thermal ambient test at
mission pressure . 120
6.5.4.2 Guidelines to thermal vacuum test . 133
6.5.4.3 Guidelines to thermal ambient test at mission pressure . 134
6.5.4.4 Thermal balance test . 135
6.5.5 Electromagnetic test . 135
6.5.5.1 General . 135
6.5.5.2 Electromagnetic compatibility test . 135
4
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021
FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021 (E)
6.5.5.3 Electromagnetic auto-compatibility test . 136
6.5.5.4 Passive intermodulation test . 136
6.5.5.5 Magnetic field measurements . 136
6.5.6 Mission specific tests . 136
6.5.6.1 Aero-thermodynamic test . 136
6.5.7 Crewed mission specific tests . 136
6.5.7.1 Micro-vibration emission test . 136
6.5.7.2 Human factor engineering (HFE) test . 136
6.5.7.3 Toxic off gassing test . 136
6.5.7.4 Audible noise test . 136
7 Pre-launch testing . 138
Annex A Mechanical tests . 139
A.1 Foreword . 139
A.2 Physical properties measurements . 139
A.2.1 Purpose . 139
A.2.2 General . 139
A.3 Static Test . 144
A.3.1 Purpose . 144
A.3.2 General . 144
A.3.3 Definition of static test configuration and load cases . 144
A.3.4 Static test evaluation . 149
A.4 Spin test . 157
A.4.1 Purpose . 157
A.4.2 General . 157
A.4.3 Test configuration and test aspects . 157
A.4.4 Test Instrumentation . 158
A.4.5 Test control parameters . 159
A.4.6 Test Preparation . 159
A.4.7 Test execution . 159
A.4.8 Test Evaluation . 159
A.5 Centrifuge test . 160
A.5.1 Purpose . 160
A.5.2 General . 160
A.5.3 Test configuration and test aspects . 160
A.5.4 Test instrumentation . 161
A.5.5 Test control parameters . 162
A.5.6 Test preparation . 162
A.5.7 Test execution . 162
A.5.8 Test evaluation . 162
5
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021
FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021 (E)
A.6 Sine burst test . 162
A.6.1 Purpose . 162
A.6.2 General . 162
A.6.3 Test configuration and test aspects . 163
A.6.4 Test instrumentation . 163
A.6.5 Test control parameters . 163
A.6.6 Test Preparation . 164
A.6.7 Test execution . 164
A.6.8 Test Evaluation . 165
A.7 Sinusoidal vibration test . 165
A.7.1 Purpose . 165
A.7.2 General . 166
A.7.3 Test configuration and test aspects . 166
A.7.4 Test preparation . 172
A.7.5 Test execution . 175
A.7.6 Test run evaluation. 176
A.8 Random vibration testing . 176
A.8.1 Purpose . 176
A.8.2 General . 176
A.8.3 Test configuration and test aspects . 177
A.8.4 Test Preparation . 179
A.8.5 Test Execution . 179
A.8.6 Test run Evaluation . 180
A.9 Acoustic testing . 181
A.9.1 Purpose . 181
A.9.2 General . 181
A.9.3 Test Configuration and test aspects . 181
A.9.4 Test preparation . 183
A.9.5 Test execution . 184
A.9.6 Test evaluation . 184
A.10 Shock testing . 184
A.11 Thermal distortion test . 185
A.11.1 Purpose . 185
A.11.2 General . 185
A.11.3 Test configuration and test aspects . 185
A.11.4 Test instrumentation . 186
A.11.5 Temperature measurement . 189
6
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021
FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021 (E)
A.11.6 Test evaluation . 190
A.12 Gravity release test . 190
A.12.1 Purpose . 190
A.12.2 General . 190
A.12.3 Test configuration and test aspects . 190
A.13 Micro-vibration environment verification by test . 191
A.13.1 Characterisation of the disturbance generated by an equipment –
direct force measurement . 191
A.13.2 Characterisation of the disturbance generated by an equipment –
indirect force measurement . 194
A.13.3 Characterisation of the susceptibility of an equipment/instrument to
microvibrations . 199
A.13.4 Characterisation at element level of a transfer function between a
source of disturbance and an equipment/instrument . 201
A.13.5 Micro-vibration susceptibility test at element level (End to End
test) . 203
A.13.6 Background noise characterisation and reduction . 206
Annex B Structural integrity tests . 210
B.1 Foreword . 210
B.2 Leak test . 211
B.2.1 Purpose . 211
B.2.2 General . 212
B.2.3 Test Configuration and Test Aspects . 212
B.2.4 Test Instrumentation . 216
B.2.5 Test control Parameters . 217
B.2.6 Test Preparation . 217
B.2.7 Test Execution . 217
B.2.8 Test Evaluation . 217
B.3 Proof pressure test . 218
B.3.1 Purpose . 218
B.3.2 General . 218
B.3.3 Test configuration and Test Aspects . 218
B.3.4 Test Instrumentation . 218
B.3.5 Test Control Parameters . 219
B.3.6 Test Preparation . 219
B.3.7 Test Execution . 219
B.3.8 Test Evaluation . 219
B.4 Pressure cycling test . 219
B.4.1 Purpose . 219
7
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021
FprCEN/CLC/TR 17603-10-03:2021 (E)
B.4.2 General . 219
B.4.3 Test configuration and Test Aspects . 220
B.4.4 Test Instrumentation . 220
B.4.5 Test Control Parameters . 220
B.4.6 Test Preparation . 220
B.4.7 Test Execution . 220
B.4.8 Test Evaluation . 220
B.5 Design burst pressure test . 221
B.5.1 Purpose . 221
B.5.2 General . 221
B.5.3 Test configuration and Test Aspects . 221
B.5.4 Test Instrumentation . 221
B.5.5 Test Control Parameters . 221
B.5.6 Test Preparation . 221
B.5.7 Test Execution .
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.