kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026

• Abstract:

  This standard specifies the safety requirements for service robots used in personal and professional/commercial applications. The service robots concerned, and the extent to which hazards, hazardous situations or hazardous events are covered, are indicated in this standard. ; This safety standard considers the conditions for physical human-robot contact to formulate safety requirements for service robots. It includes additional information on the functional safety for service robots.; This standard is not intended to cover robots used in industrial applications and medical applications.

• Status: Not Published
• Public Enquiry End Date: 18-Nov-2024
• ICS: 25.040.30 - Industrial robots. Manipulators
• Technical Committee: ITC - Information technology
• Current Stage: 5020 - Formal vote (FV) (Adopted Project)
• Start Date: 17-Sep-2026
• Due Date: 05-Nov-2026
• Completion Date: 02-Oct-2026
• Directive: 2006/42/EC - Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (recast)
• Directive:

  ---

  2023/1230 - Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery and repealing Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 73/361/EEC (Text with EEA relevance)
• Directive:

  ---

  2023/1230 - Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery and repealing Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 73/361/EEC (Text with EEA relevance)
• Directive:

  ---

  2023/1230 - Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery and repealing Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 73/361/EEC (Text with EEA relevance)
• Mandate: M/396 - Mandate to CEN and Cenelec for standardisation in the field of machinery
• Mandate: M/605 - COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 20.1.2025 on a standardisation request to the European Committee for Standardization and to the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization as regards machinery and related products in support of Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council
• Ref Project: FprEN ISO 13482 - Robotics - Safety requirements for service robots (ISO/FDIS 13482:2026)

• Replaces: SIST EN ISO 13482:2014 - Robots and robotic devices - Safety requirements for non-industrial robots - Non-medical personal care robot (ISO 13482:2014)
• Effective Date: 24-Nov-2021

kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026 is a SIST publication of the service-robot safety standard ISO/FDIS 13482:2026. It specifies safety requirements for service robots used in personal and professional/commercial applications, including stationary, mobile and wearable service robots. The document is meant for designers, manufacturers, integrators, service providers, operators and assessors who need a common basis for hazard reduction, functional safety and user information.

What does kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026 specify?

kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026 sets safety requirements for service robots in personal service and professional service use. It focuses on hazards created by the robot, its motion, its control system, its interaction with people, and the information needed for safe use.

The scope is broad across service-robot types, but it is limited primarily to human safety. It applies to multiple intended uses when at least one intended use falls within scope.

The standard is organized into the following main clauses and annexes.

Clause / annex	What it covers
1-3	Scope, normative references, terms and definitions
4	General safety requirements for service robots
5	Additional requirements for wearable robots
6	Safety-related control system requirements
7	Verification and validation
8	Information for use
Annex A	Significant hazards for service robots
Annex B	Examples of operational spaces
Annex C	Safety function performance requirements and risk-estimation parameters
Annex D	Examples for determining PLr or required SIL
Annex E	Example implementation of a safeguarded space
Annex F	Examples of service robots
Annex G	Information for lifting load
Annex H	Example safety evaluation methods for lift boarding robots
Annex I	Example safety evaluation method for braking distance
Annex ZA	Relationship with Directive 2006/42/EC

The standard does not apply to robots travelling faster than 20 km/h, robot toys, water-borne robots, flying robots, industrial robots and industrial robot applications, cleaning robots and lawn mowers covered by the listed appliance and machine standards, robots as medical devices, military or public force application robots, AGVs covered by ISO 3691-4:2023, or ACeTs covered by IEC 63281-2-2. It also does not provide requirements for road traffic participation or for transporting persons with service robots.

What are the key requirements of kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026?

kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026 is built around risk assessment, risk reduction, functional safety and clear user information. In practice, it tells you how to identify hazards, decide which safety functions are needed, and document how the robot is made safe for its intended use.

Risk assessment and risk reduction

• Clause 4.1 requires a risk assessment according to ISO 12100:2010 for each service robot. The assessment may split the robot’s limits by environment, user group or task, but risks outside the current limit set still have to be considered. In practice, this means you need to define where and how the robot is allowed to operate, not just its nominal features.
• Clause 4 follows the three-step method from ISO 12100: inherently safe design, safeguarding and complementary protective measures, and information for use. That matters because safety is not only a hardware issue - the standard expects design choices, protective measures and user instructions to work together.
• Annex A gives a minimum hazard list for service-robot hazard identification. Attachments such as cleaning or disinfection tools must be included in the risk assessment, so the robot is assessed as it is actually used.
• Clause 4.1 also says that if risks are reduced by measures not described in the standard, those measures must achieve at least the same level of risk reduction. That allows alternative solutions, but only if they are justified to the same safety level.

Wearable robots

• Clause 5 adds requirements for wearable robots that assist lower-limb, upper-limb or trunk motions. It covers low-power wearable robots, non-invasive restraint parts, and assistance based on user inputs such as body movement or bioelectric signals.
• The clause addresses hazards from power loss, start-up and restart, physical stress, vibration, instability, collision or intended contact, donning and doffing, cleaning and disinfection, assistive forces, joint injuries and unharmonized motion. For practice, this means an exoskeleton or support suit must be checked against body loading, fit, motion range and the way the user enters and exits the device.

Safety-related control system and motion control

• Clause 6 defines the required performance of safety-related control systems. Annex C classifies safety functions as mandatory, conditional or optional and links them to the required performance level (PL) or safety integrity level (SIL). That is the document’s core engineering bridge between hazard analysis and controller design.
• Clause 6.4 allows software limits to define restricted spaces only if they can stop the robot at full rated load and speed. Active safety-limit settings must be recorded and changes must be identifiable and reviewable, which matters for commissioning, audit trails and later troubleshooting.
• Clauses 6.5, 6.7 and 6.8 cover speed control, stability control and force control. The standard expects the robot to stay below hazardous speed and force and to remain stable in intended use, which means the limits must be tied to actual motion, actual contact and actual operating conditions.
• Clauses 6.9 to 6.11 address singularities, emergency situations and lift interoperability. In practice, the robot must either avoid singularities, warn and stop before them, or control the motion through them, and it must interact with lifts only under risk-assessed boarding and collision conditions.

Interface, operating modes, verification and information for use

• Clauses 6.12 to 6.15 cover the user interface, manual control devices, operational modes, and cyber security and data privacy. The robot needs clear status indication, protection against unauthorized use, and mode changes that do not create unexpected motion.
• Clause 7 requires verification and validation after risk reduction. The methods listed include inspection, practical tests, measurements, observation during operation, examination of circuit diagrams and software, review of the task-based risk assessment, and review of layout drawings and related documents.
• Clause 8 requires markings, warnings, user manuals and service manuals that match the intended use. The information must be understandable in the sales country’s official language, and it must cover intended use, prohibited use, residual risks, stopping, fault handling, transport, storage, dismantling and maintenance. For users and service staff, that is the document that turns design intent into safe operation.

What terms does kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026 define?

• service robot - a robot used in personal or professional use that performs useful tasks for humans or equipment.
• mobile service robot (MSR) - a service robot able to travel under its own control.
• wearable robot - a service robot fastened to a user’s body during use and physically assisting the user by supplementing or augmenting personal capabilities.
• autonomous mode - an operational mode in which the robot carries out its assigned mission without direct human intervention.
• command device - a device that enables the operator or user to control the robot.
• safeguarded space - the space in which the robot starts a safety-related function if a person or object is detected.
• protective stop space - the space in which the robot performs a protective stop if a person or object enters it.
• risk assessment - the overall process made up of risk analysis and risk estimation.

Who uses kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026?

kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026 is used by manufacturers, integrators and service providers to design the robot, choose safety functions, and write the technical file and manuals. It is also useful for quality, compliance and procurement teams that need to compare products or check whether a robot’s safety claims fit a use case.

The document is relevant to people who operate, maintain or validate service robots in places such as museums, shopping malls, hotels, hospitals, airports, offices, restaurants, elderly care facilities, farms and other controlled public or private spaces. Annex F shows example robot types such as mobile guide robots, delivery and serving robots, mobile manipulation robots, self-balancing robots, humanoid robots, stationary communication and manipulation robots, and wearable assist devices such as exoskeletons and walking aids.

What changed in kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026 from the previous edition?

kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026 replaces SIST EN ISO 13482:2014.

Which standards are used with kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026?

kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026 builds on a wide set of supporting standards. The table below groups the main ones by function.

Group	Standards named in the document	What they contribute
Risk and vocabulary	ISO 12100:2010, ISO 8373:2021	Risk assessment and robotics vocabulary
Safety control and guarding	ISO 13849-1:2023, ISO 13850:2015, ISO 13854:2017, ISO 13855:2010, ISO 13856:2013, ISO 13857:2019, ISO 14118:2017, ISO 14119:2013	Control-system safety, emergency stop, gaps, safeguard placement, pressure-sensitive devices, safety distances, unexpected start-up prevention, interlocking
Electrical and functional safety	IEC 60204-1:2021, IEC 61010-1:2010, IEC 61140:2016, IEC 61326-3-1:2017, IEC 61496 (all parts), IEC 61508-1, IEC 62061:2024, IEC/TS 62998-1:2019	Electrical equipment, shock protection, EMC for safety-related systems, ESPE, functional safety and sensors
Noise, vibration and ergonomics	ISO 2631-1:1997, ISO 3746:2010, ISO 4871:1996, ISO 11202:2010, ISO 13732-1:2006, ISO 13732-3:2005, ISO 15534:2000	Vibration, noise, thermal contact, ergonomic design
Markings and symbols	ISO 3864-1:2011, ISO 3864-2:2016, ISO 7000:2019, ISO 7010:2019, IEC 60417:2024	Safety colours, labels and equipment symbols
Batteries and charging	IEC 60335-1:2020, IEC 60335-2-29:2019, IEC 62133-2:2017, IEC 62619:2022	Battery, charger and lithium-cell safety
Environmental and surface tests	ISO 9227:2022, ISO 21227-3:2007, IEC 60529:2019	Corrosion testing, coating evaluation and ingress protection
Optical and radiation safety	IEC 60825-1:2014, IEC 62471:2006	Laser and photobiological safety
Lift interoperability	ISO/TS 8100-21:2018	Lift boarding alignment limits used in the lift-interaction requirements
Supporting technical reports	ISO/TR 23482-1, ISO/TR 23482-2, ISO/TR 22100-3	Earlier test methods, application guidance and ergonomic implementation guidance
Quality terminology	ISO 9000:2015	Definitions used for validation and verification

What does the kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026 document contain?

kSIST FprEN ISO 13482:2026 contains hazard lists, risk-estimation parameters, performance-level selection tables and worked examples. Annex C gives the main safety-function tables and the parameters used to estimate required PLr or required SIL, while Annex D compares the different risk-estimation terminology used by the referenced methods.

It also contains example implementation material for operational spaces and collision avoidance. Annex E uses figures and a speed-distance relationship to show how safeguarded space and protective stop space can work in a robot with a manipulator on a mobile platform.

The document includes application examples for robot types in Annex F, lifting-load calculations in Annex G, and test setups in Annex H for lift boarding and Annex I for braking distance. Annex ZA maps the clauses to Directive 2006/42/EC for European conformity work.

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
oSIST prEN ISO 13482:2024
01-november-2024
Nadomešča:
SIST EN ISO 13482:2014
Robotika - Varnostne zahteve za storitvene robote (ISO/DIS 13482:2024)
Robotics - Safety requirements for service robots (ISO/DIS 13482:2024)
Robotik - Sicherheitsanforderungen für Serviceroboter (ISO/DIS 13482:2024)
Robotique - Exigences de sécurité pour les robots de service (ISO/DIS 13482:2024)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: prEN ISO 13482
ICS:
25.040.30 Industrijski roboti. Industrial robots.
Manipulatorji Manipulators
oSIST prEN ISO 13482:2024 en,fr,de
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

oSIST prEN ISO 13482:2024
oSIST prEN ISO 13482:2024
DRAFT
International
Standard
ISO/DIS 13482
ISO/TC 299
Robotics — Safety requirements for
Secretariat: SIS
service robots
Voting begins on:
Robotique — Exigences de sécurité pour les robots de service
2024-08-27
Voting terminates on:
ICS: 25.040.30
2024-11-19
THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT CIRCULATED
FOR COMMENTS AND APPROVAL. IT
IS THEREFORE SUBJECT TO CHANGE
AND MAY NOT BE REFERRED TO AS AN
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD UNTIL
PUBLISHED AS SUCH.
This document is circulated as received from the committee secretariat.
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL,
TECHNOLOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND
USER PURPOSES, DRAFT INTERNATIONAL
STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE TO
ISO/CEN PARALLEL PROCESSING
BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR
POTENTIAL TO BECOME STANDARDS TO
WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN
NATIONAL REGULATIONS.
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED
TO SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS,
NOTIFICATION OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT
RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE AND TO
PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION.
Reference number
ISO/DIS 13482:2024(en)
oSIST prEN ISO 13482:2024
DRAFT
ISO/DIS 13482:2024(en)
International
Standard
ISO/DIS 13482
ISO/TC 299
Robotics — Safety requirements for
Secretariat: SIS
service robots
Voting begins on:
Robotique — Exigences de sécurité pour les robots de service
ICS: 25.040.30 Voting terminates on:
THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT CIRCULATED
FOR COMMENTS AND APPROVAL. IT
IS THEREFORE SUBJECT TO CHANGE
AND MAY NOT BE REFERRED TO AS AN
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD UNTIL
PUBLISHED AS SUCH.
This document is circulated as received from the committee secretariat.
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL,
© ISO 2024
TECHNOLOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND
USER PURPOSES, DRAFT INTERNATIONAL
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE TO
ISO/CEN PARALLEL PROCESSING
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
POTENTIAL TO BECOME STANDARDS TO
WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
NATIONAL REGULATIONS.
ISO copyright office
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
TO SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS,
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
NOTIFICATION OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT
Phone: [phone]
RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE AND TO
PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION.
Email: [e-mail]
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland Reference number
ISO/DIS 13482:2024(en)
ii
oSIST prEN ISO 13482:2024
ISO/DIS 13482:2024(en)
Contents Page
Foreword .vii
Introduction .viii
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 3
4 General safety requirements . 9
4.1 General .9
4.2 Hazards due to energy storage and supply .10
4.2.1 Contact with hazardous energy parts .10
4.2.2 Hazards related to battery .11
4.2.3 Uncontrolled release of stored energy. 13
4.2.4 Power failure or shutdown .14
4.3 Robot start-up and restart of regular operation . 15
4.3.1 General . 15
4.3.2 Inherently safe design . 15
4.3.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures . 15
4.3.4 Information for use . 15
4.3.5 Verification and validation . 15
4.4 Electrostatic potential . 15
4.4.1 General . 15
4.4.2 Inherently safe design .16
4.4.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures .16
4.4.4 Information for use .16
4.4.5 Verification and validation .16
4.5 Hazards due to robot shape .16
4.5.1 General .16
4.5.2 Inherently safe design .16
4.5.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures .17
4.5.4 Information for use .17
4.5.5 Verification and validation .17
4.6 Hazards due to power train components .17
4.6.1 General .17
4.6.2 Inherently safe design .17
4.6.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures .18
4.6.4 Information for use .18
4.6.5 Verification and validation .18
4.7 Emissions.18
4.7.1 Noise .18
4.7.2 Substances and fluids.19
4.7.3 Extreme temperatures . . 20
4.7.4 Radiation .21
4.8 Electromagnetic interference . 22
4.8.1 General . 22
4.8.2 Inherently safe design . 22
4.8.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures . 22
4.8.4 Information for use . 23
4.8.5 Verification and validation . 23
4.9 Stress, posture and usage . 23
4.9.1 General . 23
4.9.2 Physical stress and posture . 23
4.9.3 Mental stress . .24
4.10 Robot motion . 25
4.10.1 General . 25
4.10.2 Mechanical stability . 25

iii
oSIST prEN ISO 13482:2024
ISO/DIS 13482:2024(en)
4.10.3 Instability during travel . 26
4.10.4 Instability while carrying loads . 28
4.10.5 Instability in case of collision . 29
4.10.6 Collisions . 30
4.10.7 Physical contact during human-robot interaction .32
4.11 Durability . 33
4.11.1 General . 33
4.11.2 Inherently safe design . 33
4.11.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures . 33
4.11.4 Information for use . 33
4.11.5 Verification and validation . 34
4.12 Autonomous decisions and actions . 34
4.12.1 General . 34
4.12.2 Inherently safe design . 34
4.12.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures . 34
4.12.4 Information for use . 35
4.12.5 Verification and validation . 35
4.13 Awareness of robots by humans . 35
4.13.1 General . 35
4.13.2 Inherently safe design . 35
4.13.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures . 35
4.13.4 Information for use . 36
4.13.5 Verification and validation . 36
4.14 Environmental conditions . . 36
4.14.1 General . 36
4.14.2 Inherently safe design . 36
4.14.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures .37
4.14.4 Information for use .37
4.14.5 Verification and validation .37
4.15 Localization and navigation . 38
4.15.1 General . 38
4.15.2 Inherently safe design . 38
4.15.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures . 38
4.15.4 Information for use . 38
4.15.5 Verification and validation . 38
5 Wearable robots .39
5.1 General . 39
5.2 Hazards due to loss of power supply or shutdown . 39
5.2.1 General . 39
5.2.2 Inherent safe design . 39
5.3 Robot start-up and restart of regular operation . 40
5.3.1 General . 40
5.3.2 Inherently safe design . 40
5.3.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures . 40
5.3.4 Information for use . 40
5.4 Hazards due to physical stress . . 40
5.4.1 General . 40
5.4.2 Inherently safe design . 40
5.4.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures . 40
5.4.4 Information for use .41
5.5 Hazardous vibrations .41
5.5.1 General .41
5.5.2 Inherently safe design .41
5.5.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures .41
5.5.4 Information for use .42
5.5.5 Verification and validation .42
5.6 Mechanical instability . .42
5.6.1 General .42

iv
oSIST prEN ISO 13482:2024
ISO/DIS 13482:2024(en)
5.6.2 Inherently safe design .42
5.6.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures .42
5.6.4 Information for use .42
5.7 Instability in case of collision or intended contact .43
5.7.1 General .43
5.7.2 Inherently safe design .43
5.7.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures .43
5.7.4 Information for use .43
5.8 Hazards during donning or doffing .43
5.8.1 General .43
5.8.2 Inherently safe design .43
5.8.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures .43
5.8.4 Information for use . 44
5.9 Hazards due to insufficient durability caused by cleaning and disinfection . 44
5.9.1 General . 44
5.9.2 Inherently safe design . 44
5.9.3 Information for use . 44
5.10 Hazards caused by assistive forces . 44
5.10.1 General . 44
5.10.2 Inherently safe design .45
5.10.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures .45
5.10.4 Information for use . 46
5.10.5 Verification and validation . 46
5.11 Joint injuries due to assistance that exceeds the range of motion .47
5.11.1 General .47
5.11.2 Inherently safe design .47
5.11.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures .47
5.11.4 Information for use . 48
5.11.5 Verification and validation . 48
5.12 Hazards due to unharmonized and uncoordinated motion . 49
5.12.1 General . 49
5.12.2 Inherently safe design . 49
5.12.3 Safeguarding and complementary protective measures . 49
5.12.4 Information for use . 49
5.12.5 Verification and validation . 49
6 Safety-related control system requirements .49
6.1 Required control system performance . 49
6.1.1 General . 49
6.1.2 Required control system performance . 49
6.1.3 Determining severity . 50
6.1.4 Determining probability of occurrence . 50
6.1.5 Determining possiblity of avoidance . 50
6.2 Robot stopping . 50
6.2.1 General . 50
6.2.2 Robot stopping functions.51
6.2.3 Braking .52
6.3 Start and restart interlocking . 53
6.3.1 Start interlock . 53
6.3.2 Restart interlock . 53
6.4 Limits to operational spaces . 53
6.5 Speed control . 54
6.6 Environmental sensing . 55
6.6.1 General . 55
6.6.2 Object sensing . 55
6.6.3 Travel surface sensing . 56
6.7 Stability control .57
6.8 Force control.57
6.9 Singularity protection .57

v
oSIST prEN ISO 13482:2024
ISO/DIS 13482:2024(en)
6.10 Moving robot in emergency situations .57
6.11 Interworking with a lift (an elevator) . 58
6.12 Design of user interface . 58
6.12.1 General . 58
6.12.2 Status indication .59
6.12.3 Connection and disconnection . 60
6.12.4 Single command device for multiple robots . 60
6.12.5 Multiple command devices . 60
6.12.6 Cableless or detachable command device .61
6.12.7 Protection against unauthorized use .61
6.13 Manual control devices .61
6.13.1 General .61
6.13.2 Labelling .61
6.13.3 Protection from unintended operation .61
6.14 Operational modes .62
6.14.1 General .62
6.14.2 Autonomous mode . 63
6.14.3 Manual mode . . 63
6.14.4 Semi-autonomous mode. 63
6.14.5 Maintenance mode . . . 64
6.15 Cyber security and data privacy . 64
6.15.1 General . 64
6.15.2 Measures for data privacy and data security . 65
6.15.3 Measures for cyber security managing access privilege and stability of operation . 65
7 Verification and Validation .65
8 Information for use .66
8.1 General . 66
8.2 Markings or indications.67
8.3 User manual . 69
8.4 Service manual .70
Annex A (informative) List of significant hazards for service robots .71
Annex B (informative) Examples of operational spaces for service robots.78
Annex C (normative) Safety function performance requirements .81
Annex D (informative) Example of determination of the PLr or required SIL from risk
estimation parameters of Annex C, C.2 .98
Annex E (informative) Example of the implementation of a safeguarded space .101
Annex F (informative) Examples of service robots .104
Annex G (informative) Information for lifting load .112
Annex H (informative) Example of safety evaluation methods for lift boarding robots .114
Annex I (informative) Example of safety evaluation method for braking distance.116
Annex ZA (informative) Relationship between this European Standard and the essential
requirements of Directive 2006/42/EC aimed to be covered .117
Annex ZB (informative) Relationship between this European Standard and the essential
requirements of Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 aimed to be covered .119
Bibliography .122

vi
oSIST prEN ISO 13482:2024
ISO/DIS 13482:2024(en)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee
has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations,
governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely
with the Internat
...