EN 62567:2013

Overhead lines - Methods for testing self-damping characteristics of conductors

IEC 62567:2013 provides test procedures based on the documents mentioned in the introduction and devoted to minimize the causes of discrepancy between test results, taking into consideration the large experience accumulated in the last 30 years by numerous test engineers and available in literature, including a CIGRE Technical Brochure specifically referring to this standard (see Bibliography). This Standard describes the current methodologies, including apparatus, procedures and accuracies, for the measurement of conductor self-damping and for the data reduction formats. In addition, some basic guidance is also provided to inform the potential user of a given method's strengths and weaknesses. The methodologies and procedures incorporated in this Standard are applicable only to testing on indoor laboratory spans. Key words: Overhead lines, Self-damping, Conductors

Freileitungen - Methoden zur versuchstechnischen Bestimmung der Eigendämpfungseigenschaften von Leitern

Lignes électriques aériennes - Méthodes d'essai des caractéristiques d'auto-amortissement des conducteurs

La CEI 62567:2013 recouvre la fourniture de procédures d'essai basées sur les documents mentionnés ci-dessus et dont le but est de minimiser les causes de divergence entre les résultats d'essais, en tenant compte de la grande expérience accumulée ces 30 dernières années par un grand nombre d'ingénieurs d'essai, et disponible dans les documentations, incluant une brochure technique du CIGRÉ se référant spécifiquement à cette norme (voir la Bibliographie). La présente Norme décrit les méthodologies actuelles, incluant les appareils, modes opératoires et précisions, pour la mesure de l'auto-amortissement d'un conducteur et pour les formats de réduction de données. De plus, certaines directives fondamentales sont également fournies pour informer l'utilisateur potentiel des forces et des faiblesses d'une méthode donnée. Les méthodologies et les modes opératoires incorporés dans la présente Norme ne sont applicables qu'à un essai sur des portées de laboratoire intérieures. Mots-clés: Lignes électriques aériennes, Auto-amortissement, Conducteurs

Nadzemni vodi - Metode za preskušanje karakteristik lastnega dušenja vrvnih vodnikov (IEC 62567:2013)

Namen tega standarda je zagotoviti preskusne postopke, ki so osnovani na zgoraj omenjenih dokumentih in katerih namen je omejitev vzrokov za neskladje med rezultati preskusov, pri čemer upošteva bogate izkušnje, ki so jih v zadnjih 30 letih pridobili testni inženirji in ki so zbrane v literaturi, vključno s tehnično brošuro CIGRE, ki se nanaša predvsem na ta standard (glej poglavje Bibliografija). Ta standard opisuje metodologije, vključno z aparati, postopki in mejami, ki se uporabljajo za merjenje lastnega dušenja vrvnih vodnikov in za oblike zmanjševanja podatkov. Poleg tega zagotavlja osnovne smernice, ki morebitnega uporabnika obvestijo o prednostih in slabostih opisane metode. Metodologije in postopki, vključeni v tem standardu, se lahko uporabljajo samo za testiranje v notranjih laboratorijskih prostorih.

General Information

• Status: Published
• Publication Date: 21-Nov-2013
• Withdrawal Date: 16-Oct-2016
• ICS: 29.060 - Electrical wires and cables
• ICS: 29.240.20 - Power transmission and distribution lines
• Technical Committee: CLC/TC 7X - Overhead electrical conductors
• Drafting Committee: IEC/TC 7 - IEC_TC_7
• Current Stage: 6060 - Document made available - Publishing
• Start Date: 22-Nov-2013
• Completion Date: 22-Nov-2013
• Ref Project: SIST EN 62567:2014 - Overhead lines – Methods for testing self-damping characteristics of conductorsMethods for testing self-damping characteristics of conductors (IEC 62567:2013)

Overview

EN 62567:2013 (CLC) - identical to IEC 62567:2013 - specifies standardized methods for measuring the self-damping characteristics of overhead line conductors. The standard defines laboratory test-span arrangements, required apparatus, measurement procedures, data-reduction formats and accuracy considerations to reduce discrepancies between test results. It applies exclusively to indoor laboratory spans and draws on extensive industry experience and existing guidance (e.g., IEEE and CIGRE documents).

Key topics and technical requirements

• Test methodologies: Three principal approaches are described and compared:
  • Power Method (forced vibration) - measures power dissipated at resonance.
  • ISWR (Inverse Standing Wave Ratio) Method (forced vibration) - uses nodal/antinodal amplitude measurements.
  • Decay Method (free vibration) - determines damping from free-motion amplitude decay after forcing.
• Test-span arrangements and apparatus:
  • Indoor span terminations, shaker and vibration-control systems, shaker-to-conductor connections (rigid and flexible).
  • Transducers and measuring devices (accelerometers, force sensors) with specified accuracy and mounting considerations.
• Conductor conditioning: Procedures for clamping, running-in, and accounting for creep and conditioning effects before measurement.
• Extraneous loss sources: Identification and mitigation of sources that can bias damping measurements (aerodynamic losses, fixture losses, instrumentation).
• Data handling: Recommended data-reduction formats, presentation, and reporting requirements (Annex A and B provide parameters and reporting guidance).
• Corrections and quality checks: Informative annexes cover aerodynamic damping correction, phase-shift correction between transducers, and comparison of methods and empirical parameters.

Practical applications

• Characterizing conductor self-damping for vibration and fatigue analysis in overhead lines.
• Supplying validated damping data to support conductor selection, vibration damper design, span dynamics modelling and lifetime assessment.
• Comparing conductor types (stranded, compact, hybrid) and verifying manufacturer claims.
• Standardizing laboratory test procedures used by utilities, independent test laboratories, manufacturers and researchers to ensure comparable results.

Who should use this standard

• Test engineers and laboratory managers conducting conductor vibration testing.
• Overhead line design engineers and asset managers assessing conductor behavior under wind-induced vibration.
• Conductor manufacturers validating product performance.
• Researchers and consultants studying conductor dynamics and vibration mitigation.

Related standards

• IEC 60050-466 (IEV - Overhead lines)
• IEEE Std. 563 (Guide on conductor self-damping measurements)
• IEEE Std. 664 (Power dissipation characteristics of aeolian vibration dampers)

This standard is essential when accurate, repeatable measurement of conductor damping is required to inform design, specification and mitigation of vibration-related risks on overhead transmission lines.

Standards Content (Sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-julij-2014
Nadzemni vodi - Metode za preskušanje karakteristik lastnega dušenja vrvnih
vodnikov (IEC 62567:2013)
Overhead lines – Methods for testing self-damping characteristics of conductorsMethods
for testing self-damping characteristics of conductors (IEC 62567:2013)
Freileitungen - Methoden zur Prüfung der Eigendämpfungseigenschaften von Leitern
(IEC 62567:2013)
Lignes électriques aériennes – Méthodes d'essai des caractéristiques
d'autoamortissement des conducteurs (CIE 62567:2013)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 62567:2013
ICS:
29.240.20 Daljnovodi Power transmission and
distribution lines
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EUROPEAN STANDARD
EN 62567
NORME EUROPÉENNE
November 2013
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 29.060; 29.240.20
English version
Overhead lines -
Methods for testing self-damping characteristics of conductors
(IEC 62567:2013)
Lignes électriques aériennes -  Freileitungen -
Méthodes d'essai des caractéristiques Methoden zur Prüfung der
d'auto-amortissement des conducteurs Eigendämpfungseigenschaften von
(CEI 62567:2013) Leitern
(IEC 62567:2013)
This European Standard was approved by CENELEC on 2013-10-17. CENELEC members are bound to comply
with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard
the status of a national standard without any alteration.

Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on
application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CENELEC member.

This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other
language made by translation under the responsibility of a CENELEC member into its own language and notified
to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CENELEC members are the national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus,
the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany,
Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom.

CENELEC
European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization
Comité Européen de Normalisation Electrotechnique
Europäisches Komitee für Elektrotechnische Normung

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B - 1000 Brussels

© 2013 CENELEC - All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CENELEC members.
Ref. No. EN 62567:2013 E
Foreword
The text of document 7/629/FDIS, future edition 1 of IEC 62567, prepared by IEC/TC 7 "Overhead
electrical conductors" was submitted to the IEC-CENELEC parallel vote and approved by CENELEC
as EN 62567:2013.
The following dates are fixed:
(dop) 2014-07-17
• latest date by which the document has to be
implemented at national level by
publication of an identical national
standard or by endorsement
• latest date by which the national (dow) 2016-10-17
standards conflicting with the
document have to be withdrawn
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CENELEC [and/or CEN] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such
patent rights.
Endorsement notice
The text of the International Standard IEC 62567:2013 was approved by CENELEC as a European
Standard without any modification.

- 3 - EN 62567:2013
Annex ZA
(normative)
Normative references to international publications
with their corresponding European publications

The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are
indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated
references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.

NOTE  When an international publication has been modified by common modifications, indicated by (mod), the relevant EN/HD
applies.
Publication Year Title EN/HD Year

IEC 60050-466 1990 International electrotechnical vocabulary - -
(IEV) -
Chapter 466: Overhead lines
IEEE Std. 563 1978 IEEE Guide on conductor self-damping - -
measurements
IEEE Std. 664 1993 IEEE Guide for laboratory measurement of - -
the power dissipation characteristics of
aeolian vibration dampers for single
conductors
IEC 62567 ®
Edition 1.0 2013-09
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD
NORME
INTERNATIONALE
colour
inside
Overhead lines – Methods for testing self-damping characteristics of

conductors
Lignes électriques aériennes – Méthodes d'essai des caractéristiques d'auto-

amortissement des conducteurs
INTERNATIONAL
ELECTROTECHNICAL
COMMISSION
COMMISSION
ELECTROTECHNIQUE
PRICE CODE
INTERNATIONALE
CODE PRIX W
ICS 29.060; 29.240.20 ISBN 978-2-8322-1056-7

– 2 – 62567 © IEC:2013
CONTENTS
FOREWORD . 4
INTRODUCTION . 6
1 Scope . 7
2 Normative references . 7
3 Terms and definitions . 7
4 Symbols and units . 8
5 Test span arrangements . 8
5.1 General . 8
5.2 Span terminations . 9
5.3 Shaker and vibration control system . 10
5.4 Location of the shaker . 12
5.5 Connection between the shaker and the conductor under test . 12
5.5.1 General . 12
5.5.2 Rigid connection . 13
5.5.3 Flexible connection . 14
5.6 Transducers and measuring devices . 14
5.6.1 Type of transducers . 14
5.6.2 Transducer accuracy . 15
6 Conductor conditioning . 16
6.1 General . 16
6.2 Clamping . 16
6.3 Creep . 16
6.4 Running-in . 16
7 Extraneous loss sources . 16
8 Test procedures . 17
8.1 Determination of span resonance . 17
8.2 Power Method . 18
8.3 ISWR Method . 20
8.4 Decay method . 22
8.5 Comparison between the test methods . 24
8.6 Data presentation . 25
Annex A (normative) Recommended test parameters . 27
Annex B (informative) Reporting recommendations . 28
Annex C (informative) Correction for aerodynamic damping . 31
Annex D (informative) Correction of phase shift between transducers . 33
Bibliography . 34

Figure 1 – Test span for conductor self-damping measurements . 9
Figure 2 – Rigid clamp . 10
Figure 3 – Electro-dynamic shaker . 11
Figure 4 – Layout of a test stand for conductor self-damping measurements . 12
Figure 5 – Example of rigid connection . 13
Figure 6 – Example of flexible connection . 14
Figure 7 – Miniature accelerometer . 15

62567 © IEC:2013 – 3 –
Figure 8 – Resonant condition detected by the acceleration and force signals . 18
Figure 9 – Fuse wire system disconnecting a shaker from a test span; this double
exposure shows the mechanism both closed and open. . 23
Figure 10 – A decay trace . 24
Figure B.1 – Example of conductor power dissipation characteristics . 29
Figure B.2 – Example of conductor power dissipation characteristics . 30

Table 1 – Comparison of laboratory methods . 25
Table 2 – Comparison of Conductor Self-damping Empirical Parameters . 26
Table C.1 – Coefficients to be used with equation C-3 . 32

– 4 – 62567 © IEC:2013
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION
____________
OVERHEAD LINES – METHODS FOR TESTING SELF-DAMPING
CHARACTERISTICS OF CONDUCTORS
FOREWORD
1) The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is a worldwide organization for standardization comprising
all national electrotechnical committees (IEC National Committees). The object of IEC is to promote
international co-operation on all questions concerning standardization in the electrical and electronic fields. To
this end and in addition to other activities, IEC publishes International Standards, Technical Specifications,
Technical Reports, Publicly Available Specifications (PAS) and Guides (hereafter referred to as “IEC
Publication(s)”). Their preparation is entrusted to technical committees; any IEC National Committee interested
in the subject dealt with may participate in this preparatory work. International, governmental and non-
governmental organizations liaising with the IEC also participate in this preparation. IEC collaborates closely
with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in accordance with conditions determined by
agreement between the two organizations.
2) The formal decisions or agreements of IEC on technical matters express, as nearly as possible, an international
consensus of opinion on the relevant subjects since each technical committee has representation from all
interested IEC National Committees.
3) IEC Publications have the form of recommendations for international use and are accepted by IEC National
Committees in that sense. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure that the technical content of IEC
Publications is accurate, IEC cannot be held responsible for the way in which they are used or for any
misinterpretation by any end user.
4) In order to promote international uniformity, IEC National Committees undertake to apply IEC Publications
transparently to the maximum extent possible in their national and regional publications. Any divergence
between any IEC Publication and the corresponding national or regional publication shall be clearly indicated in
the latter.
5) IEC itself does not provide any attestation of conformity. Independent certification bodies provide conformity
assessment services and, in some areas, access to IEC marks of conformity. IEC is not responsible for any
services carried out by independent certification bodies.
6) All users should ensure that they have the latest edition of this publication.
7) No liability shall attach to IEC or its directors, employees, servants or agents including individual experts and
members of its technical committees and IEC National Committees for any personal injury, property damage or
other damage of any nature whatsoever, whether direct or indirect, or for costs (including legal fees) and
expenses arising out of the publication, use of, or reliance upon, this IEC Publication or any other IEC
Publications.
8) Attention is drawn to the Normative references cited in this publication. Use of the referenced publications is
indispensable for the correct application of this publication.
9) Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this IEC Publication may be the subject of
patent rights. IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
International Standard IEC 62567 has been prepared by IEC technical committee 7: Overhead
electrical conductors.
The text of this standard is based on the following documents:
FDIS Report on voting
7/629/FDIS 7/630/RVD
Full information on the voting for the approval of this standard can be found in the report on
voting indicated in the above table.
This publication has been drafted in accordance with the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.

62567 © IEC:2013 – 5 –
The committee has decided that the contents of this publication will remain unchanged until
the stability date indicated on the IEC web site under "http://webstore.iec.ch" in the data
related to the specific publication. At this date, the publication will be
• reconfirmed,
• withdrawn,
• replaced by a revised edition, or
• amended.
IMPORTANT – The 'colour inside' logo on the cover page of this publication indicates
that it contains colours which are considered to be useful for the correct
understanding of its contents. Users should therefore print this document using a
colour printer.
– 6 – 62567 © IEC:2013
INTRODUCTION
Conductor self-damping is a physical characteristic of the conductor that defines its capacity
to dissipate energy internally while vibrating. For conventional stranded conductors, energy
dissipation can be attributed partly to inelastic effects within the body of the wires (hysteresis
damping at the molecular level) but mostly to frictional damping, due to small relative
movements between overlapping individual wires, as the conductor flexes with the vibration
wave shape.
Self-damping capacity is an important characteristic of the conductors for overhead
transmission lines. This parameter is a principal factor in determining the response of a
conductor to alternating forces induced by the wind.
As the conductor self-damping is generally not specified by the manufacturer, it can be
determined through measurements performed on a laboratory test span. Semi-empirical
methods to estimate the self-damping parameters of untested conventional stranded
conductors are also available but often lead to different results. Further, a great variety of new
conductor types is increasingly used on transmission lines and some of them may have self-
damping characteristics and mechanisms different from the conventional stranded conductors.
A “Guide on conductor self-damping measurements” was prepared jointly in the past by the
IEEE Task Force on Conductor Vibration and CIGRE SC22 WG01, to promote uniformity in
measuring procedures. The Guide was published by IEEE as Std. 563-1978 and also by
CIGRE in Electra n°62-1979.
Three main methods are recognized in the above documents and divided into two main
categories which are usually referred to as the "forced vibration" and ''free vibration" methods.
The first forced vibration method is the “Power [Test] Method” in which the conductor is forced
into resonant vibrations, at a number of tunable harmonics, and the total power dissipated by
the vibrating conductor is measured at the point of attachment to the shaker.
The second forced vibration method, known as the “Standing Wave Method” or more precisely
“Inverse Standing Wave Ratio [Test] Method” (ISWR), determines the power dissipation
characteristics of a conductor by the measurement of antinodal and nodal amplitudes on the
span, for a number of tunable harmonics.
The free vibration method named “Decay [Test] Method” determines the power dissipation
characteristics of a conductor by measuring, at a number of tunable harmonics, the decay rate
of the free motion amplitude following a period of forced vibration.
Several laboratories around the world have performed conductor self-damping measurements
in accordance with the above mentioned Guide. However, large disparities in self-damping
predictions have been found among the results supplied by the various laboratories. The
causes of these disparities have been identified into five main points:
1) The different test methods adopted for the self-damping measurements.
2) The different span end conditions set up in the various test laboratories (rigid clamps,
flexure members, etc.)
3) The different types of connection between the shaker and the conductor (rigid or flexible)
and the different location of the power input point along the span.
4) The different conductor conditioning before the test (creep, running in, etc.)
5) The different manufacturing processes of the conductor.

62567 © IEC:2013 – 7 –
OVERHEAD LINES – METHODS FOR TESTING SELF-DAMPING
CHARACTERISTICS OF CONDUCTORS
1 Scope
The scope of this Standard is to provide test procedures based on the above-mentioned
documents and devoted to minimize the causes of discrepancy between test results, taking
into consideration the large experience accumulated in the last 30 years by numerous test
engineers and available in literature, including a CIGRE Technical Brochure specifically
referring to this standard (see Bibliography).
This Standard describes the current methodologies, including apparatus, procedures and
accuracies, for the measurement of conductor self-damping and for the data reduction formats.
In addition, some basic guidance is also provided to inform the potential user of a given
method's strengths and weaknesses.
The methodologies and procedures incorporated in this Standard are applicable only to
testing on indoor laboratory spans.
2 Normative references
The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and
are indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any
amendments) applies.
IEC 60050-466:1990, International Electrotechnical Vocabulary. Chapter 466: Overhead lines
IEEE Std. 563-1978, IEEE Guide on conductor self-damping measurements
IEEE Std. 664-1993, IEEE Guide for laboratory measurement of the power dissipation
characteristics of aeolian vibration dampers for single conductors
3 Terms and definitions
For the purpose of this International Standard, the definitions of the International
Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV) apply, in particular IEC 60050-466. Those which differ or do
not appear in the IEV are given below.
3.1
conductor self-damping:
the self-damping of a conductor subjected to a tensile load T is defined by the power P
c
dissipated per unit length by the conductor vibrating in a natural mode, with a loop length λ/2,
an antinode displacement amplitude Y and a frequency f
3.2
node
in a vibrating conductor, nodes are the points in which the vibration amplitude is the smallest
3.3
anti-node
in a vibrating conductor, anti-nodes are the points in which the vibration amplitude is the
greatest
– 8 – 62567 © IEC:2013
4 Symbols and units
A
forcing point transverse acceleration, single amplitude m/s
th
a vibration amplitude at the n node mm
n
D,d diameter of the conductor m
δ logarithmic decrement
E total energy dissipated by the vibrating conductor Joule
diss
E total kinetic energy of the vibrating conductor Joule
kin
F single amplitude exciting force N
f vibration frequency Hz
h non dimensional viscous damping coefficient
L free length of the test span m
λ wavelength m
λ/2 loop length m
m conductor mass per unit length kg/m
n number of vibrating loops in the span
n number of vibration cycles
c
n
number of loops between loop k and loop j
kj
P power dissipated by the conductor      mW
P power dissipated by the conductor per unit length mW/m

c
P power dissipated by the conductor, measured at loop j mW

j
P power dissipated by the conductor, measured at loop k mW

k
θ phase angle between force and acceleration deg
a
θ phase angle between force and displacement deg
d
θ phase angle between force and velocity deg
v
S Inverse standing wave ratio (ISWR) at loop j
j
S Inverse standing wave ratio (ISWR) at loop k
k
th
S
Inverse standing wave ratio (ISWR) at the n loop
n
T conductor tension N
V forcing point transverse velocity, single amplitude m/s
th
V vibration velocity at the n antinode – peak value m/s
n
circular frequency rad
ω
Y
single antinode amplitude at the first decay cycle mm
a
Y vibration single amplitude at the driving point mm
f
th
Y vibration single amplitude at the n antinode mm
n
Y vibration single amplitude at antinode mm
o
Y
z single antinode amplitude at the last decay cycle mm
Tm
characteristic impedance of the conductor N s/m

5 Test span arrangements
5.1 General
The laboratory test spans for conductor self-damping measurements are generally built indoor
in still air areas where the variation of ambient temperature is minimal or can be suitably
controlled. Ambient temperature variations up to 0,2 °C/h are considered acceptable.

62567 © IEC:2013 – 9 –
The free span length L should preferably be at least ten times longer than the longest loop
length used in the tests. For consistent results, a span length greater than 40m is
recommended but satisfactory results can be obtained with spans in the range of 30m. For
shorter spans, the influence of the termination losses and the distribution of the tensile load
between the conductor strands may be critical.
The test span shall be strung between two massive blocks with a weight not lower than 10 per
cent of the ultimate tensile strength of the largest conductor to be tested. Each block should
be a single piece, generally made of steel reinforced concrete, and preferably be common or
solidly connected with the concrete floor. The stiffness of these blocks should be as high as
possible in order to minimize the losses and provide the maximum reflexion of the waves.
An example of laboratory test span layout is shown in Figure 1.
IEC  2187/13
Figure 1 – Test span for conductor self-damping measurements
5.2 Span terminations
The test span should have the capability of maintaining a constant conductor tension.
Hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders, springs, threaded bars and pivotal balance beams have
been used successfully.
A rigid non-articulating square faced clamp similar to that shown in Figure 2 shall be used to
minimize energy dissipation by the termination fixture. An example of a typical termination
design is also provided in Figure 3 of IEEE Std. 563-1978. Terminating fixtures and rigid
clamps shall be of sufficient stiffness to ensure that energy losses do not occur beyond the
extremities of the free span.
Rigid end clamps (also called heavy clamps), equal to or up to ten times longer than the
conductor diameters and with groove diameters not exceeding by more than 0,25 mm the
diameter of the conductor, have given good results. Generally, the clamp groove is
dimensioned for the biggest conductor to be tested and a set of sleeves is made available to
accommodate smaller conductor diameters.
The rigid clamps shall not be used to maintain tension on the span. However, the rigid
clamps, once closed, will retain some load. Consequently, the tension devices cannot fully
control the conductor tension. Subsequent adjustments, if necessary, shall be performed only
after releasing the rigid clamps.
It is very important to have a good alignment between tension clamps and rigid clamps in the
horizontal direction. In the vertical direction, in order to eliminate the static bending of
conductor at the rigid clamp departure, it may be necessary to incline the rigid clamps
following the catenary angle. This practice, when necessary, would avoid any change in
tensile load when closing or opening the clamps.

– 10 – 62567 © IEC:2013
IEC  2188/13
Figure 2 – Rigid clamp
On a laboratory test span, normally, the wave shape of the end loops differs from the shape of
the free loops and the end loop dissipation is greater than free loop dissipation. As the energy
dissipation of the conductor is, to a first approximation, proportional to the square of its
curvature, it is easy to explain the large dissipation of energy near the end of the span. The
effect is more noticeable at low frequencies where the end loops constitute a higher
proportion of the total number of loops. It further restricts the usefulness of very short indoor
test spans.
Preference should be given to a test arrangement which would minimize energy dissipation at
the span end terminations. If there is uncertainty about this, the energy should be assessed
and eventually accounted for, unless using the ISWR method.
The termination losses may be minimized by terminating the conductor by a flexure member,
such as a wide, flat bar of sufficient strength to accommodate the span tension but also
flexible enough in the vertical direction to allow it to bend readily and to avoid bending the
conductor through a sharp radius of curvature where it would normally enter the clamp. This
procedure has the undesirable effect, though, of including the end termination in the test span.
An example of flexible cantilever is provided in Figure 4 of IEEE Std. 563-1978.
5.3 Shaker and vibration control system
The vibration exciter used for these tests is generally an electro-dynamic shaker (Figure 3).
Hydraulic actuators are also used.
Modal shakers having light armature and linear bearings can be used to excite resonance
modes of the conductor with minimal distortion of the natural mode shape and to produce
virtually zero stiffness and zero damping in the direction of the movement.
The shaker shall be able to provide a suitable sinusoidal force to the test span. The
alternating movement provided by the shaker shall be simple harmonic with a distortion level
of less than 5 %.
Vibration amplitude and frequency shall be controllable to an accuracy of ± 2 % and frequency
shall be stable within 0,001 Hz.

62567 © IEC:2013 – 11 –
IEC  2189/13
Figure 3 – Electro-dynamic shaker
The use of computers and dedicated software for the shaker control and for the data
acquisition, reduction and elaboration is considered as a normal practice.
An example of the layout for the conductor self-damping measurements, fully equipped to
perform the conductor self-damping measurements with the methods outlined in this standard,
is shown in Figure 4.
– 12 – 62567 © IEC:2013
IEC  2190/13
Figure 4 – Layout of a test stand for conductor self-damping measurements
5.4 Location of the shaker
The most used position of the shaker is within one of the end loops of the span, but not
necessarily at an anti-node. This location also makes it possible to excite greater amplitudes
than the maximum travel of the shaker even if a rigid connection between the shaker and the
conductor is used.
The near end location makes it possible to excite odd numbers of loops, as well as even.
Although some span symmetry may be lost due to the presence of the shaker, a centre free
loop will be present for the odd loop excitations. This often makes it possible to conduct
amplitude measurements within the centre loop without being forced to relocate the
transducer for each frequency investigated.
The shaker should be located at a distance from the rigid clamp which is less than the
calculated loop length of the span at the highest test frequency.  This will ensure that whole
loops will not be forced to occur between the shaker and the nearest span extremity, because
this may cause erroneous test results. It is preferably to identify a location of the shaker that
can be maintained unchanged for the whole test on one conductor. A wide range of conductor
sizes has been tested with the shaker at a fixed distance from the end clamp of 0,8 to 1,2 m.
5.5 Connection between the shaker and the conductor under test
5.5.1 General
In the artificial excitation of the indoor test span, the armature of the shaker can be connected
to the test span either rigidly or by the use of a flexible connection. In any case, the fixture
shall be as light as possible in order to avoid the introduction of unwanted inertial forces and
to prevent that, at the higher frequencies, the force needed to vibrate that mass plus the
shaker armature will be beyond the capability of the shaker system.

62567 © IEC:2013 – 13 –
To avoid distortion of the mode shape in the conductor vibration, the clamp mass must be as
low as possible and, in resonance conditions, the phase between force and acceleration, at
the driving point, must be as close as possible to 90 °. In this case, the force applied by the
shaker has its minimum and equals the damping force. For angles different from 90 °, inertia
and elastic components are also present and can give rise to distortions.
The shaker connection shall be instrumented for force and vibration level measurements. The
latter is generally made using accelerometers but also velocity transducers and displacement
transducer can be used.
5.5.2 Rigid connection
Rigidly fixing the shaker to the conductor (Figure 5) has a tendency to create distortion in the
standing wave vibration. Care should be taken when establishing span resonance to minimize
this effect.
IEC  2191/13
Figure 5 – Example of rigid connection
Using a rigid connection, the vibration exciter becomes a part of the system being measured;
if the mass of the moving system within the shaker is high, conductor distortion is induced in
that portion of the span where the shaker is attached.
This changes the length of the loop to which the shaker is attached and is indicative of
localized inertial and damping effects. The effect of attaching the shaker to the conductor
should not change the loop length in which the attachment is made by more than 10 %. An
attached mass of less than 20 % of the mass per unit length of the conductor is normally
satisfactory. However, this can only be achieved using modal shakers or adopting a flexible
connection as described in the following paragraph. Otherwise, the ISWR method, that is not
sensitive to localized effects at the shaker as well as in end loops, should be used.

– 14 – 62567 © IEC:2013
5.5.3 Flexible connection
Spring steel bands are often used to reduce distortion of the loop where the shaker is
attached and to allow different conductor amplitudes at the drive point than the amplitude of
the shaker. Suitable flexibility should be present in all directions in order to:
1) uncouple the shaker from the conductor so that possible misalignment between the centre
of the shaker table and the point of attachment of the conductor can be accommodated
and will not risk to damage the shaker armature;
2) prevent the shaker table from being driven by the conductor in resonant conditions where
conductor vibration amplitude can be higher than the shaker amplitude;
3) avoid the introduction of additional inertial and damping effects due to the shaker
armature and conductor attachment.
The stiffness of the springs in the excitation direction should be empirically determined in
accordance with the conductor stiffness and mass. The spring should be soft enough to
uncouple the conductor from the shaker but still able to transmit to the conductor enough
force to excite vibration at the required amplitude.
An example of a flexible connection equipped with force and acceleration transducers is
shown in Figure 6.
Accelerometer
Conductor clamp
Load cell
Spring steel bands
IEC  2192/13
Figure 6 – Example of flexible connection
5.6 Transducers and measuring devices
5.6.1 Type of transducers
The following transducers are used for the self-damping measurements:
A. Load cells: to measure the force transmitted by the shaker to the conductor.
B. Accelerometers, velocity transducers and displacement transducers: to measure the level
of vibration.
In addition, strain gauges are sometimes used to control the tension of the individual wires of
the outer layer and temperature probes may be used for monitoring the ambient and/or
conductor temperature.
There is no limitation or preference regarding the working principle of the transducers,
providing their mass is small enough in order not to interfere with the system. Miniature load

62567 © IEC:2013 – 15 –
cells and miniature accelerometers (Figures 6, 7 and 8) are most commonly used for in-span
measurements.
Contactless displacement transducers (laser or eddy current based) have also been used for
measurements of node and antinode amplitudes, especially with small and light conductors.
Using transducers having a different working principle, for example a piezoelectric
accelerometer and a strain gauge load cell, it is possible to have a phase shift between the
two signals due to the different response time of the two transducers. This phase shift is
frequency dependant and shall be taken into account in the determination of the phase angle
between the measured quantities at each tunable vibration mode. A procedure to calculate
the phase shift at each test frequency is presented in Annex D.
In a computer controlled test system, the data acquisition software can be set up to perform
automatically the phase shift correction. In any case, for the sake of simplicity, it is
recommended to use transducers having the same working principle so that no phase shift
correction will be required.
IEC  2193/13
Figure 7 – Miniature accelerometer
5.6.2 Transducer accuracy
All the transducers used for the tests shall be checked for phase accuracy and linearity over
the anticipated testing frequency range. The transducers shall be mounted on a shaker table
and a small mass shall be rigidly attached on the force transducer. The transducers shall be
shaken at all proposed test frequencies, and at approximately the amplitudes chosen for the
conductor test. Correct operation of the transducers is demonstrated by two criteria: (1) the
phase angle between force and acceleration (or displacement) should be at or near zero
degrees and (2) the ratio of force to acceleration (F/A) should be constant at all frequencies
and amplitudes. F/A, is the effective mass installed on the force transducer. If velocity
transducers are used, the phase angle between force and velocity should be at or near 90
degrees and acceleration can be obtained by the derivative of the velocity signal acquired.
Deviations of the phase values up to ± 5 degrees are acceptable.

– 16 – 62567 © IEC:2013
The test verifies (1) that there is no spurious phase shifting due to effects of fixtures,
transducers and signal conditioning devices and (2) that the transducers are linear with
respect to frequency and vibration amplitude. This is important especially for the transducers
used for the measurement of the power imparted to the conductor by the shaker.
6 Conductor conditioning
6.1 General
Unless otherwise specified, the conductor under test shall be unused.
Before the installation on the test span, any looseness in the conductor layers should be
worked out.
After that, the conductor is clamped and should be conditioned as described in the following.
6.2 Clamping
The terminations of the conductor under test can be made using compression dead end joints,
or bolted dead end clamps. Wedge type tension clamps and potted (resin) terminations can
also be used.
If compression end fittings are used, then they shall be reverse compressed (starting from the
clamp mouth rather than from the end of the conductor) to prevent looseness from being
worked back into the span.
6.3 Creep
After the installation of an unused conductor on the test span, a pre-stretching shall be
performed in order to accomplish most of the metallurgic creep and the geometrical
settlement of the conductor and distribute the tensile load more uniformly in the conductor
strands. The pre-stretching consists in keeping the conductor at a tension equal or higher
than the test tension for period of time, generally 12 to 48 hours. The tension to be applied
during the preconditioning shall be established in accordance with the service parameters of
the conductor.
The preconditioning will be considered sufficiently settled when the tension of the still
conductor does not change more than 3 to 4 % in 30 minutes at constant room temperature.
The conductor shall be submitted to this preconditioning without clamping it into the end rigid
clamps.
6.4 Running-in
When a conductor is unused its self-damping is not constant but varies with the accumulating
vibration cycles. This variation may be in the order of 20-40 % during the first 30-60 minutes
of vibration. A “running-in” is considered necessary to stabilize the conductor self-damping.
This consists of vibrating the conductor at a fixed frequency, or with a swept frequency in a
limited frequency range, at the maximum amplitude considered for the self-damping
measurements. Power measurements should be performed every 15 minutes and the running
in will be considered completed when the difference between two consecutive measurements
will not exceed 3 to 4 %.
7 Extraneous loss sources
Apart of the main energy dissipation due to the vibration of the conductor at a natural
frequency, some other energy losses take place in the test span. The source of these

62567 © IEC:2013 – 17 –
extraneous losses has to be recognized and, if possible, eliminated or reduced to the
minimum. They are:
• Conductor deformation induced by the device used to force conductor vibration.
• Conductor deformation at span extremities due to the clamping system.
• Aerodynamic losses due to the conductor vibration in still air. The contribution of the
aerodynamic damping to total damping may not be negligible at low frequency but
generally it is reduced practically to zero at high frequency. Aerodynamic losses can be
calculated according to the method reported in Annex C and subtracted, if required, from
the measured losses.
• Torsional, longitudinal and transversal motions other than the driven motion. Torsional and
longitudinal motions may be induced through coupling with the forced transversal motion.
Test frequencies where this occurs shall be skipped. Torsional modes can also be excited
Transversal
by the asymmetry of the conductor and by misalignment of the shaker.
motions at low frequency can be excited by air movements or by accidental contact with
the conductor. The vibrating conductor shall be visually controlled to verify the absence of
these kinds of motion.
• Longitudinal support damping due to the insufficient rigidity of the terminating fixtures
which results in the transmission of conductor vibration power into the tensioning
apparatus where some of that power may be dissipated.
8 Test procedures
8.1 Determination of span resonance
All the test methods described in this Standard require that the conductor should reach a
resonant condition.
To find the system resonance, the shaker is operated at a trial power setting and the
frequency control is adjusted to provide for maximum displacement of the conductor at an
antinode. Then the shaker power controls are adjusted to provide the correct loop amplitude/
velocity at an antinode. Frequency is fine-tuned to maximize loop amplitude. If necessary, the
shaker power is again adjusted to provide the desired loop amplitude. System resonance is
found when adjustments of the frequency control no longer results in an increase in loop
amplitude. Testing is performed when the standing wave is stable at the correct
amplitude/velocity.
An alternative method make use of the measurements/monitoring of force and acceleration (or
velocity) and their relative phase angle at the shaker attachment. The frequency is tuned un
...