CEN/TR 17828:2022
(Main)Road infrastructure - Automated vehicle interactions - Reference Framework Release 1
Road infrastructure - Automated vehicle interactions - Reference Framework Release 1
This document provides the current road equipment suppliers’ visions and their associated short term and medium-term priority deployment scenarios. Potential functional/operational standardization issues enabling a safe interaction of road equipment/infrastructure with automated vehicles in a consistent and interoperable way are identified. This is paving the way for a deeper analysis of standardization actions which are necessary for the deployment of priority short-time applications and use cases.
This deeper analysis will be done at the level of each priority application/use case by identifying existing standards to be used, standards gaps/overlaps and new standards to be developed to support this deployment.
The release 1 is focusing on short-term (2022 to 2027) and medium-term deployment. Further releases will update this initial vision according to short term deployment reality.
The objectives of this document are to:
- Support the TC 226 and its WG12 work through the development of a common vision of the roles and responsibilities of a modern, smart road infrastructure in the context of the automated vehicle deployment from SAE level 1 to SAE level 5. The roles and responsibilities of the road infrastructure are related to its level of intelligence provided by functions and data being managed at its level.
- Promote the road equipment suppliers and partners visions associated to their short-term and medium- term priorities to European SDOs and European Union with the goal of having available relevant, consistent standards sets enabling the identified priority deployment scenarios.
NOTE Road equipment/infrastructure includes the physical reality as its digital representation (digital twin). Both need to present a real time consistency.
Straßeninfrastruktur - Bezugsrahmen für die Interaktion automatisierter Fahrzeuge
Interactions Infrastructure routière - Véhicule automatisé : Cadre de reference
Le présent document présente les visions actuelles des fournisseurs d’équipements de la route et leurs scénarios de déploiement prioritaires à court et moyen terme associés. Les problèmes potentiels liés à la normalisation fonctionnelle / opérationnelle permettant des interactions sûres entre les équipements de la route / l’infrastructure routière et les véhicules automatisés de manière cohérente et interopérable sont identifiés. Cela ouvre la voie à une analyse plus approfondie des actions de normalisation nécessaires au déploiement d’applications et de cas d’utilisation prioritaires à court terme.
Cette analyse plus approfondie sera réalisée au niveau de chaque application/cas d’utilisation prioritaire en identifiant les normes existantes à utiliser, les lacunes / recoupements des normes et les nouvelles normes à élaborer pour accompagner ce déploiement.
La version 1 est axée sur le déploiement à court terme (2022 à 2027) et moyen terme. D’autres versions mettront à jour cette vision initiale en fonction de la réalité du déploiement à court terme.
Les objectifs de ce rapport technique sont les suivants :
Soutenir le comité technique TC 226 et son groupe de travail WG12 dans le développement d’une vision commune des rôles et des responsabilités d’une infrastructure routière moderne et intelligente dans le contexte du déploiement des véhicules automatisés de niveaux SAE 1 à 5. Les rôles et responsabilités de l’infrastructure routière sont liés au niveau d’intelligence que lui confèrent les fonctions et les données gérées à son niveau.
Promouvoir les visions des partenaires et fournisseurs d’équipements de la route associées à leurs priorités à court et moyen terme auprès des SDO européens et de l’Union européenne dans le but de disposer d’ensembles de normes pertinents et cohérents permettant la mise en œuvre des scénarios de déploiement prioritaires identifiés.
Note : Les équipements de la route et l’infrastructure routière comprennent la réalité physique sous la forme de sa représentation numérique (jumeau numérique). Les deux doivent présenter une cohérence en temps réel.
Cestna infrastruktura - Avtomatizirane interakcije vozil - Referenčni okvir, različica 1
Ta dokument podaja trenutne vizije dobaviteljev opreme za ceste ter njihove kratkoročne in srednjeročne prednostne scenarije uvajanja, povezane s tem. Opredeljene so potencialne težave s funkcionalno/operativno standardizacijo, ki omogoča varno interakcijo med opremo za ceste/cestno infrastrukturo in avtomatiziranimi vozili na skladen in interoperabilen način. To omogoča za izčrpnejšo analizo standardizacijskih ukrepov, ki so potrebni za uvedbo prednostnih kratkoročnih aplikacij in primerov uporabe.
Ta izčrpnejša analiza bo opravljena na ravni vsake prednostne aplikacije/primera uporabe z opredelitvijo obstoječih standardov, ki jih je treba uporabiti, vrzeli/prekrivanja standardov in novih standardov, ki bi jih bilo treba razviti za podporo pri tem uvajanju.
1. izdaja se osredotoča na kratkoročno (2022–2027) in srednjeročno uvajanje. Nadaljnje izdaje bodo prvotno vizijo posodobile ob upoštevanju dejanskega poteka kratkoročnega uvajanja.
Namen tega dokumenta je:
– podpreti TC 226 in delo povezane skupine WG12 z oblikovanjem skupne vizije vlog in odgovornosti sodobne, pametne cestne infrastrukture v kontekstu uvajanja avtomatiziranih vozil od stopnje SAE 1 do stopnje SAE 5. Vloge in odgovornosti cestne infrastrukture so povezane z njeno stopnjo inteligence, ki jo zagotavljajo funkcije in podatki, ki se upravljajo na njeni ravni;
– spodbujati vizije dobaviteljev opreme za ceste in partnerjev, povezane z njihovimi kratkoročnimi in srednjeročnimi prednostnimi nalogami, pri evropskih organizacijah za razvoj standardov in Evropski uniji, da bi zagotovili ustrezne in dosledne sklope standardov, ki bi omogočili razvoj opredeljenih prednostnih scenarijev uvajanja.
OPOMBA: Oprema za ceste/cestna infrastruktura vključuje fizično realnost kot digitalni prikaz (digitalni dvojček). Oboje mora biti usklajeno v realnem času.
General Information
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-september-2022
Cestna infrastruktura - Avtomatizirane interakcije vozil - Referenčni okvir, različica
Road infrastructure - Automated vehicle interactions - Reference Framework Release 1
Straßeninfrastruktur - Bezugsrahmen für die Interaktion automatisierter Fahrzeuge
Interactions Infrastructure routière - Véhicule automatisé : Cadre de référence Version 1
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN/TR 17828:2022
ICS:
35.240.60 Uporabniške rešitve IT v IT applications in transport
prometu
43.020 Cestna vozila na splošno Road vehicles in general
93.080.99 Drugi standardi v zvezi s Other standards related to
cestnim inženiringom road engineering
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
CEN/TR 17828
TECHNICAL REPORT
RAPPORT TECHNIQUE
June 2022
TECHNISCHER BERICHT
ICS 35.240.60; 43.020; 93.080.99
English Version
Road infrastructure - Automated vehicle interactions -
Reference Framework Release 1
Interactions Infrastructures routières - Véhicules Straßeninfrastruktur - Bezugsrahmen für die
automatisés - Cadre de référence Interaktion automatisierter Fahrzeuge
This Technical Report was approved by CEN on 6 June 2022. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 226.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2022 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN/TR 17828:2022 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents Page
European foreword . 4
Introduction . 5
1 Scope . 6
2 Normative references . 6
3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms . 6
3.1 Terms and definitions . 6
3.2 Symbols and abbreviated terms . 8
4 Common basic principles . 10
4.1 Intelligent Transport System in CEN TC 226 . 10
4.2 ITS interactions . 10
4.3 Operational Design Domain . 11
4.4 Road infrastructure capabilities . 12
4.5 Sustainability principles . 12
4.6 Deployment scenario . 14
4.7 Hybrid environment . 15
4.8 Functional safety/redundancy principles . 15
5 Functional distribution and interactions . 16
5.1 Introduction . 16
5.2 Road infrastructure – Vehicles: autonomous interactions for improved road safety . 17
5.3 Road infrastructure – automated vehicles cooperative interactions . 20
5.4 Road infrastructure – automated vehicles model-based interactions . 22
5.5 Road infrastructure – automated vehicles interactions fusion . 23
6 Operational interactions . 28
6.1 General. 28
6.2 System interoperability . 28
6.3 System performances . 28
6.4 System functional safety . 29
6.5 System scalability . 30
7 Applications and use cases under investigation. . 30
7.1 Overview . 30
7.2 Accurate, complete digital map as a digital mean for automated vehicle navigation. 30
7.3 Dynamic navigation for automated vehicles . 31
7.4 Contextual dedicated corridor management . 32
7.5 Automated parking management and vehicle valet . 32
7.6 Road infrastructure support for VRU safety . 33
7.7 Road infrastructure support for platoon management . 33
7.8 Vehicles distribution . 34
7.9 Intersection crossing assistance. . 35
7.10 Approaching a tolling barrier . 36
7.11 Collision avoidance consecutive to the traffic code violation . 36
7.12 Vehicle interception . 37
7.13 Public road lighting control . 37
7.14 Energy distribution for automated vehicles . 37
7.15 Probe vehicles data collection. 38
7.16 Integration of C-ITS in public warning systems . 38
7.17 Various POI. 38
7.18 On demand automated vehicles . 39
8 Summary of deployment scenarios priorities . 39
8.1 General. 39
8.2 A few guiding rules for the filling of the priority inquiry . 39
8.3 Analysis of the inquiry results . 42
8.4 Synthesis of the deployment scenarios priorities result . 43
9 Long-term evolution . 45
10 Economic & organizational potential impacts . 46
10.1 General . 46
10.2 Roles and responsibilities . 46
10.3 Organizational impacts . 46
10.4 Economic impacts . 49
11 Projected standardization approaches for identified priority applications. 50
11.1 General . 50
11.2 Contextual, dedicated corridor management . 50
11.3 Road infrastructure support for VRUs safety . 50
11.4 Parking management . 51
11.5 Vehicles’ distribution . 51
11.6 Approaching a tolling barrier . 51
11.7 Accurate digital map . 52
11.8 Dynamic navigation . 52
11.9 Intersection crossing assist. 52
11.10 Platooning . 53
Bibliography . 54
European foreword
This document (CEN/TR 17828:2022) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 226 “Road
equipment”, the secretariat of which is held by AFNOR.
This document provides a pre-standardization study for the road infrastructure – automated vehicle
interactions which will be used by WG12 as a reference framework for the development of other pre-
standardization studies.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Any feedback and questions on this document should be directed to the users’ national standards body.
A complete listing of these bodies can be found on the CEN website.
Introduction
A shared general vision between the main stakeholders which are involved in the development and
deployment of automated vehicles is that their complexity requires a constant effort to converge toward
safe, interoperable solutions.
This complexity is related to the considered mobility environment, in terms of road topography, traffic
and weather conditions, human behaviour, vehicle diversity, etc.
This led these main stakeholders to think that it is necessary, in a certain number of situations, to provide
some forms of cooperation between the roadside infrastructure (road equipment) and automated
vehicles.
Such necessity is reinforced through the fact that the deployment of automated vehicles will be
progressive, leading to a heterogeneous mix of different levels of automated vehicles from not automated
in-service vehicles (SAE level 0) to fully automated vehicles (SAE levels 4 &5).
This cooperation will require different forms o
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.